Tag Archives: mass

The Devotion to the Sacred Heart: First Fridays

Thumbnail

Hello Everyone.This post is a bit special to me, as I am going to write about a devotion topic that I have participated in and has since held a place in my prayer life: The Sacred Heart of Jesus. More specifically, this post will be devoted to the practice of the First Fridays.

View original post here - 

The Devotion to the Sacred Heart: First Fridays

Angels Among Us

More here - 

Angels Among Us

Agony of Our Lord in each Holy Mass

Thumbnail

Photo taken from http://muniatintrantes.blogspot.com/’And forasmuch as, in this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the mass, that same Christ is contained and immolated in an unbloody manner, who once offered Himself in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross (…)’ The Council of Trent DOCTRINE ON THE SACRIFICE OF THE MASS 

See the original post:  

Agony of Our Lord in each Holy Mass

English Propers: Mass for the Election of a Pope or a Bishop

Here are some English chant propers, with texts as found in the Roman Missal, for the Mass for the Election of a Pope or Bishop. Download freely.Score for the cantor/choir:MASS FOR THE ELECTION OF A POPE OR BISHOP A handout for the congregation:ANTIPHON SHEET / NO VERSES For more information, see illuminarepublications.com.Print this post

Follow this link: 

English Propers: Mass for the Election of a Pope or a Bishop

Where are all the men?

Thumbnail

Where are all the men?

Original link: 

Where are all the men?

Five Minute Mass Reflection – February 10, 2013

Thumbnail

This Sunday, our first reading will come from Isaiah 6:1-2a, 3-8 (Isaiah has a vision of Heaven, is purified of his sins, and readily answers God’s call sending him out), the responsory is Psalm 138 (‘In the sight of the angels, I will sing Your praises, Lord), the second reading comes from 1 Corinthians 15:1-11 (St. Paul describing how he has passed on the tradition given to him), and the Gospel is Luke 5:1-11 (the miraculous catch of fish, and Jesus’ call of Simon Peter.)The full text of the readings is available on the US Bishops website, and you can read them by clicking here.There is a fantastic parallel in the first reading and the Gospel – the call of Isaiah to be a prophet and St

Continue reading here: 

Five Minute Mass Reflection – February 10, 2013

Abortion…The Ultimate Crime…The Gravest Sin.

Abortion…The Ultimate Crime…The Gravest Sin. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in Reparation for Abortionby Fr

Read More: 

Abortion…The Ultimate Crime…The Gravest Sin.

Five Minute Mass Reflection – November 18, 2012

Thumbnail

This Sunday, our first reading comes from the prophet Daniel 12:1-3 (a prophecy about the second coming of Christ); the responsory is Psalm 16 (You are my inheritance, oh Lord); the second reading comes from the letter to the Hebrews 10:11-14, 18 (how Christ now sits at the right hand of the Father, waiting to make His enemies his footstool, and having made the final offering for all sin); and the Gospel is Mark 13:24-32 (Jesus speaking of his own return.)You can read the full text for the readings from the US Bishops website, here.As the Church year winds down, the Mass readings usually start to turn to end of  the world and second coming themes.  (You can read my thoughts on whether I think that’s happening this year or not here.)  What always sticks out to me when these conversations start is how much they seem to focus on fear. 

Continue reading - 

Five Minute Mass Reflection – November 18, 2012

Interesting follow up to my Last Post

So I was viewing my blog roll today on Blogger when I see this from Vox Cantoris:http://voxcantor.blogspot.ca/2012/11/asperges-me-as-long-as-its-not-in.html Looks like someone paid me a visit last night and read my post. I honestly just put the article up there as a “Cool!“ moment that one encounters while surfing the net for something they wanted, and got something else while searching for it

Link - 

Interesting follow up to my Last Post

Why do Catholics attend church more often than Protestants?

Thumbnail

Why do Catholics attend church more often than Protestants?Posted Monday, September 24th, 2012 at 5:00 am under Eucharist/Mass, Fr. John Bartunek, Questions and Answers, SacramentsTags:Catholics, Eucharist, Holy Communion, Mass, ProtestantsQ: Dear Father John, can you help me understand and explain why Catholics go to Church so much more than Protestants (as with daily communicants)

Read this article - 

Why do Catholics attend church more often than Protestants?

Should I convert to Catholicism?

Thumbnail

Should I convert to Catholicism?Posted Monday, September 17th, 2012 at 5:00 am under Conversion, Fr.

Link:  

Should I convert to Catholicism?

23rd Sunday OT – Resources on Mark 7:31-37

23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time – Resources on the Sunday Gospel Mark 7:31-37http://www.silk.net/RelEd/gospel-mark-7-b.htm Catechesis with Children – Bible Study / Commentaries and Meditations – Homilies Preparing for the Liturgy – Images / Clipart / Coloring Pages / PuzzlesFaith First: Twenty-Third Sunday of Ordinary Time – Year BCatechist Background and PreparationPrimary SessionIntermediate SessionJunior High School Commentary on Mark, Chapter 7 By Jeanie C. Crain, Missouri Western State College, The Gospel of Mark: A Study Based on the Old Testament www.lifeissues.net | Homilies – 23rd Sunday OT B CNP Liturgical Planning – Twenty Third Sunday of Ordinary Time (B) – Music Suggestions lipart and Reflections on the Sunday readings – Fr.

More - 

23rd Sunday OT – Resources on Mark 7:31-37

22nd Sunday in OT – Resources on Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23

22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time – Resources on the Sunday Gospel Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23http://www.silk.net/RelEd/gospel-mark-7-a.htm Catechesis with Children – Bible Study / Commentaries and Meditations – Homilies Preparing for the Liturgy – Images / Clipart / Coloring Pages / PuzzlesRules and Traditions, children’s story by Larry Broding, word-sunday.com. Proclaiming Faith – Gospel Reflection and Discussion Questions Mark 7:1-13 clean and unclean – Mark 7:14-23 God’s law & men’s rules – commentary & meditation for daily reflection and study by Don Schwager “Diversionary Tactics,” Ordinary 22B, Fr.

Continue reading:

22nd Sunday in OT – Resources on Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23

A Picture Book of the Mass- Review in the National Catholic Register!

Thumbnail

Today, the National Catholic Register came out with an article on my new book- A Picture Book of the Mass Illustrated by the Masters. You can read the review here. 

Read this article: 

A Picture Book of the Mass- Review in the National Catholic Register!

Making Time for Prayer

Thumbnail

Dear Theophilus,The Archdiocese of Toronto recently tweeted “The average commuting time in the GTA = 80 minutes! That’s plenty of time to pray the Rosary while you travel.” Keeping in mind that Toronto is the most populous city in Canada, I’m sure the same could be said about every major city across the globe.

Continue reading here: 

Making Time for Prayer

Quickpost: Same Vein, Different Poster

Hello everyone.

Here`s something from RENEGADE TRAD, an interesting Traditional Catholic Poster who hails now from Toronto. He`s one of those new found Young Gun trads, the ones who aren’t such sticklers and actually contemplate and think about issues with tradition. While I’m a giant shotgun, this guy is a sniper rifle in his postings and commentary. He just recently did a posting about a forum from an extremist trad site, Fisheaters (I do not endorse it!). Sane vein as my previous rant in the EF ordination post, but on a different part of the EF liturgy. See here, comment, or enjoy, and go spike his stats. YCRCM.

http://renegadetrad.blogspot.ca/2012/06/state-of-trad-dom.html

View the original here: 

Quickpost: Same Vein, Different Poster

Who can receive Holy Communion?

Who can receive Holy Communion?

Dear Father John, It is my understanding that only Catholics who are in the state of grace may receive Holy Communion. I know that only God really knows the state of a person’s soul. I am also aware that there have been hurts inflicted by very fallible and imperfect members of the Church that may prevent a person from fully and outwardly embracing the Church. If a person is not a member of the Catholic Church, but believes that the Eucharist is truly the Body and Blood of Christ, why should they not receive Holy Communion?

I am honored to be an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion. I have been approached while in this position by just such a person. I have given him the Holy Eucharist, but am feeling more and more uncomfortable because I have been told that that someone who is not a Catholic should not receive.  I do not want to drive a further wedge between him and the Church, but feel that I need to talk to him about it. What can I say? How can I explain to this person why he should not receive the Holy Eucharist?

A: This question is extremely difficult for me to answer. I can only provide general observations, but you are referencing some specific situations (or at least one) without detailing them. I apologize ahead of time if my answer doesn’t satisfy. I am also wondering a bit about what they explained to you in this regard when they prepared you to become an Extraordinary Minister of the Eucharist. Perhaps during that preparation you met someone closer to home that you may be able to approach about the specific situation you reference. Here also is a good summary of the biblical and Catechetical passages that are involved in this issue. Now here are a few more thoughts.

An Intimate Encounter

Receiving Holy Communion is a deeply personal encounter with Jesus Christ, who is truly present under the appearances of bread and wine, within Christ’s family of the Church. When Jesus gives himself to us in Holy Communion, he is saying many things, things like the following: “I know you and I love you. I long to share your life and to allow you to share my life. I want you with me, and I want my grace to heal, strengthen, enlighten, and guide your difficult journey through this fallen world. I give you this spiritual nourishment as a sign of my love for you and my commitment to you. All that I lived, taught, and suffered, I did for you…”

When we receive Holy Communion, we are accepting Christ’s love and Christ’s grace. That includes accepting all that he has taught, and all that his Church teaches, about the meaning of life and the path to fuller and fuller “union with” (this is what “communion” means) our Lord and Savior here on earth, and to a complete union with him forever in heaven. When we receive him, we are telling him: “Lord, I believe in you, and in all you have taught, and in all you have done for me. I believe in your Church, through which you give me this Blessed Sacrament. I long to follow you more closely. I long for my life to give you glory and to be a mirror of your goodness in this dark world. I promise to do everything I can to obey your commandments, since that is how you have asked me to show you my love (cf. John 14:15). I want to live in true friendship with you, today, tomorrow, and forever.”

Avoiding a Lie

Now, someone who does not accept what the Catholic Church teaches about faith and morals, cannot actually say those things. They cannot be in full communion with Christ in the Catholic Church, because the Catholic Church believes that Christ continues to act in the world through his Church. A Lutheran, an Episcopalian, or a Buddhist, for instance, does not accept all the basic teachings of the Gospels as explained in the Catholic Catechism, and so they are not in “communion” with Christ in his Church – if they did accept those teachings, they would become Catholic. So, for someone in that position to receive Holy Communion in the Catholic Church is, in a sense, for them to say something that they really don’t believe (i.e., “I am in communion with Christ and his Catholic Church”) – it’s a kind of lie. (Here is a short essay I wrote explaining the differences between Catholic and non-Catholic Christians, and here is another short essay I wrote explaining the Church’s view of non-Christian religions.)

If someone who does believe what the Catechism teaches about faith and morals (and the Catechism is simply a systematic explanation of what Jesus taught in the Gospels and the Holy Spirit teaches in the rest of the Scriptures), but refuses to live by that teaching, they would also be contradicting themselves by receiving Holy Communion. Someone who is having an affair, for example, would need to repent of the sin, confess the sin, and make a firm resolution to break off the affair before receiving Holy Communion. An affair is a grave sin against marriage, against God’s plan for marriage, against God’s plan for the people having the affair. To receive Communion without repenting from and confessing that sin is like saying to Jesus, “I want to follow you, but I think you are wrong about the meaning of marriage and the evil of adultery, so I am just going to keep doing my own thing in that area.” It’s a contradiction; it’s saying that I am in communion with Christ, but then, in my next breath, turning around and rejecting him, slapping him in the face. It’s, again, in a certain sense, a lie.

Dealing with Difficult Situations

If you know people who really want to receive Jesus in the Eucharist, but who are not currently in a position to be able to do so, I would encourage you to begin a relationship of spiritual friendship and instruction with them. Explain to them that Jesus too wants to give himself to them in this Blessed Sacrament. But explain to them that the Sacrament doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It is a central part of a relationship in which we must accept Christ for who he truly is: the Lord of the universe and the one Savior. And so, we must acknowledge our dependence on him, and we must “repent and believe in the good news!” as he said in his first homily (Mark 1:15). We must help people in this situation to undertake and persevere on a journey to the fullness of faith. Otherwise, we invite them to live a kind of lie every time they receive Holy Communion, and we only make the situation worse.

While they are on this journey, we should encourage them to come to Mass, to participate in the Liturgy, to receive blessings and to join in the prayer of the Church. But until they have repented from their sin or professed the Catholic faith, they really can’t receive Holy Communion in the way that God desires, and in a way that will nourish their souls with his grace.

“Speaking the Truth in Love” (Ephesians 4:15)

This may be a difficult process. People may be offended. We have to try and understand where they are coming from, and be gentle and respectful and patient, and explain, and not condemn – but at the same time, we must believe deeply in the power of God’s grace to change hearts, and in the power of the truth of our holy faith to “set us free” (cf. John 8:32). We do no favors to anyone by obscuring or disobeying the teaching of our Lord and of his Church. In this area, we need to ask for God’s grace to give us prudence and compassion, so that we don’t “break the bruised weed or put out the smoldering wick” (cf. Matthew 12:2). This is what St. Paul meant, at least in part, by the phrase “speaking the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15). It’s what St. Peter exhorts us to do: “Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect” (1 Peter 3:15). Sometimes we will make mistakes. But God can use even our clumsy efforts to build his Kingdom.

St. Paul was very clear about the reverence and right-heartedness required for worthy reception of Holy Communion: “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup” (1 Corinthians 11:27–28). Let us all pray that we will receive Jesus with the love he longs for, and help others do the same. He wants that – passionately.

Subscribe To Site:

Link:  

Who can receive Holy Communion?

Quickpost: FSSP in Ottawa, Ontario, moving to new parish

Hello All,

Just a quickpost right now. Here’s some news from Ottawa on the Church’s personal Latin Mass Ordinate, the Fraternal Society of St. Peter (FSSP), who has a parish that is moving to a new church building:

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/life/With+Latin+mass+parish+secures+future+drawing+from+past/6562537/story.html

YCRCM.

Original post: 

Quickpost: FSSP in Ottawa, Ontario, moving to new parish

Study in America Magazine: Why People Leave the Catholic Church and What They Want

Hello All.

Still need to get myself to hunker down and change the posting on the SSPX part II. Unfortunately it won’t be until a bit later this week. I just finished 4 straight days of shifts and 3 of them are night shift (booooo!!!) and I got only a brief respite till tommorow’s night shift. Those just kill me and I sleep in for 5-6 hours immediately after the following day. I might as well conisder the whole day lost.

Anyways I was scouring the blogs I usually read last week, and I found this link from a friend of mine on another Catholic blog (sorry, can’t reveal the blog else it’s obvious who I am. I don’t think he knows I blog under a pseudoname, but I want to keep it that way):

http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=13347

This article has a bishop who did a study in his American diocese in Trenton, New Jersey, from fallen away parishoners. Hopefully he asked a lot more people than the Jersey Shore Snookis and Situations out there. lol! ok it was a corny Jersey Shore joke. Then again, maybe it would be interesting to ask each of them about their collapsed faith lives. We do know Snooki a.k.a. Nicole Polizzi was an altar server as in a Youtube Video on her personal channel, she said she “used to hold the candles and the book for the priest.”

But I digress. While reading the article above, I couldn’t help but read the articles featured reasons as to why they fall away from a few direct statements in the survey. There were many more items to break apart in the 2nd half of the article with regard to what people want in the Church, but I chose to focus this post on the first 1/2 with reasons why those people left the church, and my commentary in blue text. As always, this is from the viewpoint of a young adult, Roman Catholic, male layperson in Canada who received a private Catholic high school education (more truer to Magisteriam Teaching) and has been a Catholic revert for 2.5 years now.

Reason 1: The Church hierarchy is corrupt and evil!

“…. One respondent wrote: “I separated my family from the Catholic Church and turned to an alternate religion for a while and then returned knowing I had the right religion but the wrong people running it.” Several chose to specify that they separated themselves from “the hierarchy….”

Alright, here we have a case of “I left the Church cause the idiots running the show are corrupt.” First let’s get the rough stuff out of the way. Yes, the instiutional Church has screwed up, as you have seen some occasions here on YCRCMB. What I meant by the institutional church is: the liberal or weakly-catechized teachers of Catholic schools, the numerous lax or liberal priests, the religious brothers and sisters (Fr. Z. will sometimes refer to the sisters and the “Magisterium of Nuns”), your parents, etc. Many people in the wake of the “Spirit of”/misapplication of Vatican II” took all sorts of liberties with their positions in power. Furthermore, yes we’ve seen priests in financial and even sexual scandal or bishops who have failed to uphold even Canon Law. Disgraced and likely lacized Raymond Lahey is the most recent example to mind here in Canada. So sorry if you sadly got one of these priests, teachers, or even your parents, who failed to teach you the authentic true tenets of the Catholic Faith.

Now, does this mean that the whole Church is bad???? No. As a whole, Christ in Matthew 16:18 vowed to Peter when he infomred him he would have His teaching authority (knowing he would die on the Cross), that “the gates of Hell shall not prevail against [the Church] when it comes to providing us the means of spirtual salvation. Further when we look at the individuals in the Church in positions of power, when they screw up or are corrupt all the way to the Popes themselves (e.g. the Medici line of popes), the Church will still be there for us and theologically and spiritually remain intact till His Second Coming (a.k.a. the end of all existence). If it has survived corruption before, it will continue to survive, and be the spiritual link to our salvation despite what happens in its physical walls and organization.

In addition, all throughout our salvation history including the Old Testament, God (and Jesus once the Word Made Flesh existed) used ordinary, sinful men, to carry out God’s love and desire for our selves to unify us with him. In the OT, think of for example, king David, whom was one of the most, if not the greatest, king(s) of Israel of all time. He sent poor Uriah to die in battle to claim his wife for himself (Uh David? hello? I think there is a commandment of those big 10 about coveting your neighbour’s goods???). Once a prophet came and chided him did he finally realize “Oh no!!!!”. Yes even this great king was flawed. And look at the Apostles themselves. They were all sinners, heck Matthew was even a reviled tax collector, and they were the big 12 who carried out Christ’s authority and began what is the awesome Catholic Church. Also don’t forget, of those sinful apostles, two of the four Gospels were written by a member each, including that reviled tax collector.

Reason 2a, b, c: Female roles, Peer involvement, and Spiritual Mentorship

” One 23-year-old woman said: I felt deceived and undervalued by the church. I didn’t understand certain things and found no mentors within the church. I just stopped going because my community of friends and family were no longer in the church …

2A, “DEPRECIATION OF WOMAN”: Man, this is a much larger kettle of fish when you deal with the Church and feminism. I won’t tackle the ideaology in depth, other than to say that thanks to 2nd wave radical feminism, it has misled both sexes (incl. men in supporting this) to believe in more than just human rights and true equality for women, including misandry (man-hating) and a passion to rule the world and punish all men or those who won’t go along with their agenda. Now this woman is by no means shown to be a radical feminist, or a feminist at all for that matter, but I have to adress her deception and undervaluing. I also am sorry for this young woman, that with the liberal wave of the “Spirit of Vatican II” came a lie in the form of women infiltrating every crevice of the Church and taking over it like a rebellion, and the poor examples of conduct shown by her role models of both sexes. Maybe even being told of things like womynpriests and even a woman pope.That was not the truth and you should have not been even led to believe such a thing. Blame our stupid higher ups and the “Magisterium of [pantsuit] Nuns” for that one, and us laity for just going along with that.

I will say, however, that the Church does have many positive roles for women. One of the better fruits of Vatican II was the opening of liturgical “ministries” once held by minor orders to the Laity. This young woman, and yourselves too any female readers, can actively get involved in the Liturgy. Because of an indult (indults are supposed to be “special priviledges” not the norm in the Church) that got widespread to a point, Pope John Paul II had to be prudent and for the sake of civility, he made altar serving available to women in Churches and dioceses that allow it (some bishop’s don’t or pastors in their parishes don’t and the bishop OKs this.) So one could be a female altar server. There are other lay ministries in the Mass, like extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist, and lectors that PROCLAIM the Word of God. Also there are female sacristans, directors of religious education/catechists, and even pastoral associates. If you want to be somewnat more valued as a young person in the Church, show them you mean business!!!! Turn the tides and show them you love your Mother Church and the Holy Father and Want to make a good, positive, orthodox difference in your parish and keep it alive! Also as a side note, there have been many female saints and some powerful writers such as St. Joan of Arc, St. Hildegard of Bingen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hildegard_of_Bingen), Mother Theresa, and Alice Von Hildebrand who’ve made their mark so to speak on the Church’s history as key figures (and Saints!). A modern day Catholic phenom or example is Dr. Janet Smith. Also, John Paul II has adressed this modern state of Women in the Church in a very heartfelt letter here: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_29061995_women_en.html

2B, “No Mentors”: I partially disagree with the respondent on this one. Where I disagree is that there are many good mentors in the Church, even if they are not in traditional roles. We tend to think of mentors as simply the priests, bishops, or nuns. While laity cannot provide traditional spiritual direction or deep counselling (high school and hospital chapliancy seems different from that,) mentors or role models in the church can extend to people we don’t think of normally: the sacristan, the head of a ministry such as lectoring, the youth minister, maybe even the parish secretary or humble Ms. Lumen Christi who goes to her weekly Mass, prays the Rosary daily, and has her wits about her with regards to the true teachings of the Catholic faith while looking after her children and grandchildren in her spare time! Just because there aren’t a lot of clergy to look up to, or a lack of clergy who are traditional and don’t espouse worldly values, it doesn’t mean there are a lack or good mentors out there. Also if its true Church knowledge you are looking for, there’s laypeople doing apologetics and teaching it right (e.g. Catholic Answers, Fr. Z) on the Internet, and maybe even your own diocese (though that can WIDELY vary according to what your bishop “allows`.`) If it really is that bad, then thanks to today’s technologies, go out there and find out the Truth for yourself! Thanks to the marvels of the Internet and other technology and cheap printing, the true Catholic faith in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and its Compendium or other good solid literature is one Amazon.com order away, or one is just a click away from the Vatican’s/Popes of present and pasts’ major writings on www.vatican.va/. Also, you are not alone. There are lonesome good faithful Catholic youngsters out there too if you know where to look. They are also amonst the pews. I’m sure they’d love a friend like you too and also to feel not alone out there. That’s what I did myself to revert, though a youth ministry helped me start to get there. And if you have the guts, go be that mentor! Go get the training and form that youth minsitry (a lot of hard work required though, so be firm in commitment!) Change the outlook on things! Finally, there are more traditional orders of nuns and priests springing up in correlation with the New Evangelization, and even the average seminarian or priest of the John Paul II and Benedict XVI generations is becoming more sound and reliable as spiritual mentors. Why if your local seminary allows contact with those seminarians outside of the parish in their practicum year, maybe a seminarian could be your mentor! They are relatively young too!

2C: Peer Involvement: I 100% support this woman’s statement on it. For high schoolers, and even more so young adults who aren’t married, the institutional Church overall, sucks, when it comes to reaching this age group. It seems still the big focus is: Getting those sacraments pumped into kids` spiritual veins like some sort of vaccine up to Confirmation age, Marriage, and seniors. They are the institutional Church`s biggest “clients/consumers” to use crude business terminology. Sadly this approach makes it much harder for youth to appreciate the Church, and when their parishes or communities (including univerisities) have nothing to offer or what is offered is rather POOR and uninviting like my univeristy years were, it`s either tackle the world alone with whatever little Catholic Faith you got, or “join the party“ of the secular, amoral, hedonist culture of the world and do whatever you want (and hopefully nothing serious will befall you …. ). However, there are efforts being made to incorporate youth into the Church`s daily life again. In the wake of declining parish populations and a slow but steady revival of Church theological and spiritual orthodoxy, parishes and dioceses are waking up to realize this group needs to be sought out as they are LOSING the youth to the world, flesh, and the Devil (if priests even acknolwedge his existence to begin with). Numerous parishes are even getting in there and dealing with pre-teens as, to paraphrase the EDGE (TM) youth ministry program that deals with Gr. 6-8 pre-teens: These kids are at a precous stage in their physical, mental, and especially spritual development as young Catholics. They are metaphorically “on the edge“ and if we don`t reach out to them in this ever increasigly aggresive secular world, we may lose them forever and they won`t remain in the Catholic Church …. and likely never desire to come back. This idea even extends to the teenage years and especally for young adults prior to marriage years. Even good young Catholic men and women like myself, can fall after that stage, even if they got a `better upbringing` in their youth and teens. Once they hit university, if they aren`t strong enough to hit the wall of secularism that smacks them in the face, or stay within a supportive Catholic parish/community, well you get the picture. Therefore, youth ministries of varying degrees are emerging. Now, not all ministries are equal. Some are organized programs like LIFETEEN(TM) and EDGE (TM) needing large bodies of people in a core team (priest, youth minister, leaders), while others are one to few person gigs with a less structured focus meeting less frequently. Also, not all ministers are theologically conservative, depending on their background, personality, and even what they are studying in their post-secondary Catholic school. This is where you gotta do your research and find one that will help you to love the Church (including its teachings) and also enhance your personal spirituality. However, for this survey respondent in particular, it was even much harder for her, as those people she looked up to bought into the secular culture of the world and gave her poor example to live up to as a Catholic. Sometimes, you just gotta bite the bullet and go against the grain of those you know, and YOU be the shining example of the faith, that “light of the world, the salt of the Earth“ to your family and friends. You be the catechist, you be the “New Evangelization“ in your actions and knowledge of the faith and maybe you will call your friends and family back to the spiritual arms of Mother Church (she is a mother in a sense, the “Bride of Christ.“). As a last note, do look around your city and parish for youth ministries and even singles communities of Catholics, or even Catholic dating services, if you are seriously considering marriage yourself. Just be careful which one you use. Ì recommend the one promoted on Catholic Answers, www.catholicmatch.com/ as that one is not a secular dating site, nor is it geared towards extreme ultra/rad-trad Catholics either.

Reason 3: THE LITURGY!!!!!!: ““I tried different Catholic churches in the area because I just didn’t seem to be getting anything out of the Mass, especially the homily.” Another person said, “I stopped going regularly because the homilies were so empty. And whenever the church wanted to raise money, they dropped the homily and talked money.” There were many complaints about the quality of homilies as well as about poor music at Mass.“ [My text is now red colour as I'm going into Fr.Z rant mode]

Homiletics/Catechesis
AHHHHHH!!!!! If there is any one thing that ticks me off as to making people leave parishes, it’s this. Priests and higher clergy (Deacons included), the homily is not the time to express your wishy-washy liberal sentiments or to promote social justice causes. It is also not “me” time to say something that makes you feel good nor joke around (though I’d make an exception for using it as a literary device to introduce your topic of necessity). The homily is the time to make sense of the Liturgy of the Word’s readings to the congregation, to tell “the moral of the story” as it were from the mouth of Christ himself, and even to relate Christ’s teachings to modern day life, and that may include reiterating Catholic teachings (yes, of THAT CATECHISM) and even apologetics as well. People crave those good, solid homilies they can take home, even just one nugget of spiritual umph to nourish their souls and minds, geared towards the objective truth of the Lord. They also are in a world of constant flux and are relying on YOU to tackle those issues, like that YouTube kid who says he loves Jesus but hates organized religion. We hate when you abuse the message of Christ to promote your latest church fundraizing campaign DURING THE MASS (unless you also teach us a theological lesson about the necessity of a parish building and its centrality to our faith) or even replace the homily with a “guest speaker” from the local diocesan charity that also deals out money to pro-abortion side arm divisions (knowingly or unknowingly). If you have to announce this stuff due to the commands from the bishops (an every Mass this Sunday kind of thing), the proper place in the Ordinary Form is before the dismissal, and in the EF prior to the “continuation of the Gospel” before the Homily. However you could also have people optionally listen after a Mass, and you don`t waste time with the uninterested early self-dismissal people either.

Finally, your homily might be ALL the Catechesis that a kid or adult will get in their whole week. No, you CANNOT TRUST the separate school systems as they are under the thumb of the government who gives them most of their funding or teachers who teach under the guise of “tolerance“ and “anti-bullying.“ They must obey whatever the government dictates or suffer financially, and that might include promoting social justice causes that contradict Church teaching. Worse, not all your teachers that work in those systems are Catholic. And the ones that are? I dare you to quiz them on their basics: What is the Trinity? What is the Mass? What is the Eucharist? What are the 7 Sacraments? Do they know what Sin is? Is there such a thing as Sin? Many would not be able to give a straight answer I’d bet you. Also, if the school administration and teachers are brainwashed socially and liberally beyond reasoning, the minute you step foot and mention SIN of any kind or a teaching on the big issues like papal infallability, abortion, euthanasia etc. I guarantee you will likely not be let back in to that school. Therefore clergy, you got only one shot a week to teach these people something about the true Faith. If you don’t want to and espouse a “Jesus loves everybody” message, they’ll find NOTHING UNIQUE about the Catholic faith vs. the other faiths out there, or worse will think you aren’t serious about your position and are just “sucking on the power teat” as it were. Now if they like that kinda “lukewarm” thing, fine, but maybe you should look ahead to the future 10-20 years down the road when your donating parishoners die and the collection baskets thin out because the next generation isn’t giving a lot and not having enough children (or none if they are contracepting), and the next two generations are leaving/have left the parishes after Confirmation. Just saying!

In fact, I’m personally switching my parish for the Novus Ordo, as this above is one of the reasons. At least at the new N.O. parish I’m seeking has priests that give good traditionally-minded hiomilies, one of them leaning more on solid catechesis and spirituality while another excels at applying the Gospel and LOTW to the modern world. That’s the stuff I crave baby!!! And it seems this young woman does too.

The Liturgical Music
Now to tackle music. Music’s purpose in the liturgy is outlined here in the Papal Instruction Liturgicam Sacram
5. Liturgical worship is given a more noble form when it is celebrated in
song, with the ministers of each degree fulfilling their ministry and the people
participating in it” (I, 5). In other words, it is used as an accompanyment to help lift your soul and help you be in a prayerful mood for the Mass and be able to particilate in it more fully. This document, BTW, was issued by the Vatican II pope, Paul VI. Let’s look further into this document: “
60. The new melodies for the vernacular texts certainly need to undergo a period
of experimentation in order that they may attain a sufficient maturity and
perfection. However, anything done in churches, even if only for experimental
purposes, which is unbecoming to the holiness of the place, the dignity of the
liturgy and the devotion of the faithful, must be avoided.” (V, 60) I post this with regard to that fodangled new pop-ish stuff and those tunes of the 60′s and 70′s in your parents’ days where pop hits were turned into Churchy songs (or in the worst cases even used) as well as some of the new genres like “praise and worship.” What can we take from this? Look, there is leeway for experiementation and development of new sacred music in Church history. But that does not give you the right to incorporate whatever music you like in the liturgy, just to be “in with the times.” If we want secular garbage we’ll get that off YouTube and we don’t need it elsewhere. We young people can’t stand when adults try to “cramp our style” so to speak.

Also accompanying that paragraph is this: ” …. Musical instruments can be very useful in sacred celebrations, whether
they accompany the singing or whether they are played as solo instruments. “The pipe organ is to be held in high esteem in the Latin Church, since it is
its traditional instrument, the sound of which can add a wonderful splendor to
the Church’s ceremonies and powerfully lift up men’s minds to God and higher
things.” “The use of other instruments may also be admitted in divine worship, given
the decision and consent of the competent territorial authority, provided that
the instruments are suitable for sacred use, or can be adapted to it, that they
are in keeping with the dignity of the temple, and truly contribute to the
edification of the faithful.”[43]” (VI, 62) Secular instruments and elements might be okay, but have to be assessed as to whether they are or are not geared to the liturgy. Also, just by their sound/nature, some instruments are clearly poorly suited or not at all for the liturgy (e.g. drums, electric guitar when it’s not electrically changed by an amp to sound acoustic, and even acoustic guitars to some extent) should be either cautiously used or not at all. The Church, the choir loft, and especially the sanctuary, is not suitable for a rock concert! Sadly there’s that territorial authority thing (cough, bishops, cough) so em if you get a liberal one, well don’t be suprized to find the aging hippie band or the folk choir with a guitar at the parish. As for the LIFETEEN/EDGE rock group bands, well I’m mixed. I say the best thing is, well fine let them have their band playing P and W music (if they have to have a band at all for those Masses) but do introduce them to Gregorian Chant and other better Church music to see the gamut of “allowable” music and read to the youth the document above, as well as some of the Vatican II stuff that also speaks with regard to the liturgy. Practically, Is there a schola or a choir school/cathedral they can take a day/eve trip to see? Maybe a secular choir that performs classical/baroque pieces out of musical respect or reverence?

Now you might say, what about the corny music that passes for liturgical “hymns“? Well likely they got by thanks to your bishop cause of this: “54. In preparing popular versions of those parts which will be set to
melodies, and especially of the Psalter, experts should take care that fidelity
to the Latin text is suitably harmonized with applicability of the vernacular
text to musical settings. The nature and laws of each language must be
respected, and the features and special characteristics of each people must be
taken into consideration: all this, together with the laws of sacred music,
should be carefully considered by musicians in the preparation of the new
melodies. The competent territorial authority will therefore ensure that in the
commission entrusted with the composition of versions for the people, there are
experts in the subjects already mentioned as well as in Latin and the
vernacular; from the outset of the work, they must combine their efforts.” (V, 54). So in a nutshell, if the bishop is lax and lets this stuff by, well too bad if your pastor okays it use. This is where you have to let your bishop and pastor know you don’t like what they do. If they don’t listen, you have every right to walk and register at another parish that does respect the Church’s liturgical tradition and has music that elevates your soul in the liturgy of the Mass. You also have the right to take your money and put it into the hands of competent musical ministers or choirmasters, and withhold it if your parish is screwing with your ability to truly worship Christ in the Mass in a proper, liturgically correct, manner. It is your hard earned money after all. Also one can protest with their feet: The Church CANNOT deny you your sacraments as long as you are not excommunicated (with exception to reconciliation likely at the hands of the bishop), so you can go to any Catholic Church and attend their Mass, including ones with all the smells and bells and Gregorian Chant if your home parish keeps singing “Gather us In” from that Gather hymnal and “Send down the fire”.


My point is, well, the lady has a valid point! Not all this kind of modern stuff is liked by our generation, and we do like the traditional uplifting Church music. We want music that lifts our souls to participate more fully in the Mass, and if you aren’t doing it parish X, we have the right and we will go to parish Y that has that unless we are, like “whatever.” though we likely won’t come back for a long time or never if we have that attitude. You can’t deny us our sacraments and kick us out for our liturgical musical preferences. Furthermore, not everyone is moved by your type of music (though not everyone, even some faithful young Roman Catholics, are moved by Gregorian Chant and actually are moved by Praise and Worship or other forms of liturgical music). My point is, move with your feet and your wallet if you can’t stand the bandstand.

Alright rant mode OFF. Unfortunately the liberal/mainstream media has made a mess in the minds of many average people with this one, Reason # 4: “…. The scandal surrounding the sexual abuse of minors by clergy was mentioned often. One man said that what did it for him was “the bishop’s refusal to list pedophile priests on the diocesan Web site and his non-support of the effort to lift the statute of limitations for bringing sexual abuses cases forward in the courts”

Well I cannot stand for this person’s diocese. However, generally, those priests and bishops who have done anything like this, you’ve made the Church worse and you deserve the criminal and civil and Church penalties you get. Even Canada is not immune. It is generally known that some of the nuns and priests who took care of Native Canadian reserve school and residences, treated the Natives with abuse of multiple kinds. Also, recently a bishop from the Maritimes, Raymond Lahey, was found with pornography with his computer in 2009. So there’s no shortage of stories even for Canada. However, generally, as a whole, the majority of Church clergy do not engage in this kind of activity. In fact this can be applied to every major profession in modern society. The expression is “a few rotten apples spoil the bunch”. Now, I will not perform apologeitcs on the Church sex crisis in this post in detail as it’s been extensively covered by other Internet and media apologists. For Canadians, the best arguments I can recommend are found in the works of Michael Coren of Sun Media TV, especially “Why the Catholic Church is Right.” He tackles the issue with a whole chapter RIGHT FROM THE START of his book. As for the rest of you viewers you can also view Michael Voris’ video series on this matter in his little 6-10 min daily faith blurb called “The Vortex” on youtube. Search for Michael Voris, Vortex, and sex scandal or crisis in Catholic Church. I believe he did the weeklong series at the beginning of September in 2010 when the 2nd wave of the crisis hit or was still at high tide?

And this is where I will retire. I could spend many a day on this portion of the survey and more, but this mind has other things he’d like to devote his time to. Enjoy the read, and as always, my blog rules are in effect, so think before posting.

Pax Tibi Christi, YCRCM.

View original:  

Study in America Magazine: Why People Leave the Catholic Church and What They Want

Vatican II and the Experience of the Laity

Thumbnail


So moving from perhaps
what before the second Vatican Council and what happened during it, what have
the results been?

I have read enough
vicious attacks on the internet about ‘that’s not my experience’ to approach
this subject with trepidation so first I have to say that what follows is

my

experience and ideas that
flow from it and also a reflection on my time as a Priest and what this time
has meant to my parishioners.

I think that I want to
put this under three headings:


  1. change in liturgy
  2. failure in catechesis (i.e.
    what the faith means)
  3. a spirit of freedom

Actually the second and
third are related, but never mind.



We have to remember that
for the vast percentage of Catholics their only real contact with the Church is
and was Holy Mass.

And so to begin. In most
people’s minds the Council brought about the liturgy (the Mass) as we have it.
And let’s just put a few discussions to one side.

I know that our present
Ordinary Form of Mass was not what the Council wanted and was not mandated by
it.

I know that the Ordinary
Form can be celebrated in Latin and with Gregorian Chant and the Priest facing
God – and I know as well that in most places this is not the case. Here in
Chavagnes I celebrate Mass in Latin with chant, facing God, communion on the
tongue and kneeling, and for the boys it may as well be another rite of Mass.
Generally it is not what they get in their home parishes.



So all that being said, let’s
not doubt that for most people the Council changed the Mass into
English/French/whatever and made the Priest face the people… and it’s much
better than it was. And all three of those statements are false of course – but
they are believed.

And it meant that this Mass was different and better than what had gone
before – what was old had to be changed. The Mass was more accessible. The old way was
just about the Priest and the people where just onlookers. If you wanted to get
more people to Mass then you should adapt the Mass for what the people wanted.
After all that’s what the second Vatican Council had done.

I don’t even know where
to begin with these lies. For lies they are, have no doubt about it. But the
people believed them… and why would they not? After all it was their Priests
who were telling them these falsehoods. But fundamentally I want to say that if
the Mass could change, then everything that went along with it could change.
And at the same time they were being taught nonsense.

If you want to be
depressed then look at a book from the early sixties about what someone leaving
school should know about the faith. The rot had not yet set in and the faith is
clear and exact. Of course not all would know that much, but now it would not
even be hoped for.



So the Mass changed and
at the same time Catechesis collapsed. They were clearly connected. You could
not use the old teaching books because they referred to the Mass and the Mass
was now radically different. And the world… well the world was going down the
‘there’s no real right or wrong – it’s just how it affects you’ route. And
don’t forget that we had the engage with the morals of the time and not condemn
them because otherwise we would not be allowed to play in the big experiment of
making the world a better place.

And anyway, if the one
unchangeable star in the Church’s firmament, namely the Mass – the holy and
august, bloodless sacrifice of God to God – was now not only unrecognisable
from what had gone before, but the old Mass was forbidden, mocked and lied about

by Catholics

then was there actually
anything that was timeless and true? And the new books never even mentioned the
subject of eternal truth. Indeed was the idea of ‘teaching’ the faith, and not
living it and allowing it to form you and be formed by you, even valid anymore?

And a spirit of freedom?
Well no one, including the Church, was telling you what was right and wrong!
The sense of obedience, even as a notion, was seriously damaged. And what could
you be obedient to? One priest told the people one thing another told them
something else. Priests and even Bishops snubbed and ignored one of the most
important documents in modern times,

Humanæ
Vitæ

, condemning the use of artificial contraception. Even now to mention
it brings clerical death.



And the people left. What
was there left to die for in the faith? Our English and Welsh martyrs died a
Mass that was now open to scorn. What could you point to if you wanted to
identify yourself as a Catholic? Fidelity to Rome – not when you ignore her
teachings. And if you won’t die for it, then you won’t live for it. Well
perhaps as a social club, but not if it actually makes some demands from your
life. So they stopped the thing that Catholics did, i.e. going to Mass (or even
thinking that they should be there when they weren’t).

All of this led to the
collapse in the fidelity and fervour of Catholics, who ended up with no idea of
what the faith was and a vague feeling that you could do more or less what you
liked. But all the time they had a sneeking suspicion that this stuff that they
were being fed was a pile of tosh and that Catholicism was really about
something more solid.

Well I hope that’s what
they believed. And continue to believe.

View this article - 

Vatican II and the Experience of the Laity