It has been interesting to read the responses to the excellent FIUV position paper on the restoration of the three-hour Eucharistic fast, summarised on Rorate Caeli.As pointed out by Joseph Shaw, many people only read other blog posts on the paper (such as the one by Australia Incognita), and then made all sorts of objections to the three-hour fast which had already been dealt with in the original paper.Quite a few of the comments on Fr. Ray Blake’s post seem to suggest that, since the rules have been relaxed, it would be impossible to reimpose them.I disagree.For many years, I observed Friday abstinence as a voluntary penance
View original:














