Daily Archives: June 28, 2012

Euthanasia debate heating up in Tasmania

Thumbnail


On June 28, I (Alex Schadenberg) was in

Hobart Tasmania meeting with members of the Tasmania state parliament

concerning the announcement earlier in the week that the Labour/Greens coalition government will once again be

debating the legalization of euthanasia in Tasmania

.

In response to the announced euthanasia debate, Paul Russell – HOPE Australia, and I called a media conference on the steps of parliament at noon to offer the media another point of view.

After the meeting with the members of the Tasmanian parliament we received a text concerning a media release sent out by Philip Nitschke, the founder of EXIT International, explaining his intention to open a euthanasia clinic with mobile euthanasia teams, if Tasmania legalizes euthanasia.

The Tasmanian Examiner reported on the issue with this article entitled: Mobile Euthanasia unit ‘ready for law change.‘ that stated:

Dr Philip Nitschke yesterday announced plans for a mobile euthanasia clinic for Tasmania, while opponents of euthanasia were in Hobart to meet state politicians.

Premier Lara Giddings and Tasmanian Greens leader Nick McKim are developing a private members’ bill to legalise euthanasia, with a discussion paper expected in the next few weeks.

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition executive director, Canadian Alex Schadenberg, was in Hobart to meet Legislative Councillors and some MHAs to lobby against legalising euthanasia and assisted suicide.

He said studies undertaken in Belgium where euthanasia was legal showed the law, while it was clear, was not being followed.

He said a study published in 2010 of euthanasia deaths in Flanders found that 32 per cent of those deaths were done without request or consent.

“You cannot actually assume that everybody will be protected,” Mr Schadenberg said.
“What you’re actually doing in law . . . you have to create an exception under certain circumstances for murder.”

Mr Schadenberg said a euthanasia bill was defeated in the Canadian Parliament in 2010 but the debate led to a parliamentary committee looking at ways palliative care could be improved.

Meanwhile, Exit International director Dr Nitschke made public plans for a Tasmanian mobile medically assisted suicide clinic, modelled on the Dutch version.

He said the clinic model would be “readied for operation to coincide with the expected law change in Tasmania”.

The euthanasia issue is heating up in Tasmania. The Tasmanian Parliament has debated euthanasia on several occasions and over the years it has had two inquiries into the feasibility of legalizing euthanasia with both enquiries deciding against legalization.

While in Tasmania, the big issue that the people shared with me was the crisis in healthcare that was occurring on the Island.

The Tasmanian people were very concerned that the Greens and Labour leaders are pushing euthanasia again to achieve cost savings in healthcare. Whether this is true or not, it should be noted that when the pressure to cut the cost of healthcare is mixed with euthanasia, that the pressure to die will soon outweigh the will to live.

Excerpt from:  

Euthanasia debate heating up in Tasmania

Venerable!

Continued:  

Venerable!

Non Praevalebunt e Basta

View this article - 

Non Praevalebunt e Basta

Novena to the Holy Ghost for the SSPX: let’s all join in

Thumbnail

Jean II Restout - Pentecôte

The Society of St Pius X’s annual General Chapter will take place at St Pius X Seminary in Econe, Switzerland from 9-14 July, following a retreat for the participants (the General Council and the SSPX’s major superiors).

The SSPX has invited the faithful, religious and clergy to join the members of the SSPX in a novena to the Holy Ghost from June 30 to July 8. The novena will consist of praying the Veni Creator Spiritus with the addition of 2 invocations:

Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us. (3 times)
St. Pius X, pray for us.

Here is the text of the Veni Creator Spiritus with translation.

I will be praying this novena and I encourage you to do so in solidarity with the SSPX and especially for the cause of full canonical recognition for the Society.

View article:

Novena to the Holy Ghost for the SSPX: let’s all join in

I had the rabbit

I couldn’t get to Fr Hunwicke’s Ordination last night, at the Oxford Oratory, I heard it was very beautiful, there a few

pictures here

. I also heard the celebrant preached against the wickedness of “rubricism”; a little unfortunate as following them with a degree of precision is the great charism of our English Oratories.

Today however I actually met Fr Hunwicke, at the London Oratory, where he celebrated his first Mass in the Extraordinary Form at the Lady Altar. We have corresponded for some time and have friends in common and I have felt something of his pain at not being able to celebrate Mass. I recognise in him a truly priestly soul. The Mass was beautiful, it was low, no sermon, some rather exquisite vestments, over and done in 35 minutes. There were about 50 in the congregation including

Supertrad Mum,

who I met but didn’t get chance to talk to.

Mass was served by Br Matthew Mary from Papa Stronsay, and Fr Michael Mary was also in attendance doing a little photographing, there should be some pictures on their blog soon.
It was the first time I met any of the Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer and despite Fr Michael Mary saying he thought I must be in my eighties, apparently the picture on side bar doesn’t do me favours! I liked him very much indeed, in fact both of them were very impressive, there seemed to be very healthy father/son relationship, a real sense of mutual respect, with a gentle sense of humour between the two, always a healthy sign in religious community. I have heard such good reports about them lately, it was good to see it for myself.

After Mass we had lunch together, I had rabbit, Fr H a marmite of fish, Br M quail and Fr M steak. I know it was Vigil in most places but in Westminster it was the Feast of St John Southwell and of course for us a celebration of a first Mass. We did debate the decency of posting pictures of our food on our blogs and decided it was a bit foreign fad.

But it was a lovely lunch, a great deal of laughter, a little talk about whether SSPX will be reconciled, the mad Bishop of Bux, a little Gregory Dix from Fr H, lots of stories of “patrimony”. One of the important things I have always said about the Ordinariate which I think cradle Catholics just don’t get is its humour which Fr Hunwicke supplied in heaps. Again, what I was impressed by was that the Sons were so positive about the long process of the reconciliation they are still going through, which will be completed when they are canonically erect as a religious institute and also about those who have actually been their detractors, who they have left behind.

It was a really beautiful celebration for the eve of St Peter and Paul; Fr Hunwicke in communion with the Church and now a happily a priest of the Catholic Church and Br Matthew and Fr Michael Mary in communion with Peter and joyfully hoping for the canonical erection of Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer and trusting in the goodness of Bishop Hugh Gilbert.

Jump to original:

I had the rabbit

Watch Canadian Archbishops receive the pallium on S+L

On Friday morning, S+L brings you the annual Mass of the Imposition of the Pallium. The pallium, a band of wool shorn from lambs blessed on the Feast of St. Agnes, symbolizes the close bond between the Pope and his Archbishops. In this liturgical celebration, held each year on the Solemnity of Sts. Peter and Paul, Benedict XVI will confer the pallium on the Metropolitan Archbishops nominated in the past year, including Canadian Archbishops Christian Lépine of Montreal, Paul-André Durocher of Gatineau, Luc Cyr of Sherbrooke, and Valéry Vienneau of Moncton. (Archbishop Vienneau will not be in Rome, but will instead receive the pallium in his archdiocese following his installation on August 29.)

S+L will air the pallium mass on Friday, June 29 at 11:00 am ET / 8:00am PT, with repeat presentations at 8:00pm ET / 5:00pm PT and midnight ET / 9:00pm PT, both on S+L TV and online via our website. You can follow the liturgy with the online booklet for the celebration.

Laying hands on Fr Hunwicke

Thumbnail

Only as a presbyter, of course. Fr John Hunwicke was ordained yesterday at the Church of St Aloysius at Oxford, the home of the Oxford Oratory, by Bishop William Kenney, Auxiliary in Birmingham.

Here he is, prostrate during the Litany of the Saints sung by Fr James Bradley:

The Newman Consort sang Palestrina’s

Missa Papae Marcelli

for the Kyrie and Sanctus, and the plainchant Introit, Gradual, Offertory and Communion. At the anointing, they sang

Iam non dicam vos servos

by Dominique Phinot, and at Communion Byrd’s

Sacerdotes Domini

. The singing was sublime and I was glad that I made the choice to attend

in choro

since I was able to listen to the music as part of my

actuosa participatio

. Fr Michael Mary and Brother Martin de Porres were also in choir, along with Fr Edward van den Bergh of the London Oratory. Concelebrants, in addition to priests of the Ordinariate, and priests from the Oratory, included Fr John Saward, Fr Aidan Nichols OP and Fr John Osman

The ceremony showed that the Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham can teach many of us something about the Roman Liturgy. Having the propers sung in the proper place is routine for the Ordinariate at sung Masses. May their good example inspire parishes to discover the proper place of sacred music.

After Mass, along with the others present, I received Fr Hunwicke’s blessing. I was glad to have made the journey to Oxford for the greater blessing of his priestly ordination which God has granted to the Church and for which many of us have been praying earnestly.

Photo credits: top from the

Ordinariate Flickr set

(H/T

Fr Stephen Smuts

) Other photos: Heather Buttery

Link:

Laying hands on Fr Hunwicke

Mississippi’s last abortion clinic faces closure: files desperate last-minute lawsuit

JACKSON, June 28, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Mississippi’s only abortion clinic has ask a federal judge to issue a temporary restraining order against a new law, enforcing higher standards for abortionists, which stands ready to shut the facility down at the start of July.

Owner of the Jackson Women’s Health Organization abortuary, Diane Derzis, claims the new law is unconstitutional because it would effectively ban abortions in Mississippi “by imposing medically unjustified requirements on physicians who perform abortions.”

The law requires every abortionist in the state to be board certified as an obstetrician-gynecologist and to have admitting privileges at a local hospital. This allows them to refer women to a local hospital following botched abortions or other complications.

“This legislation is an important step in strengthening abortion regulations and protecting the health and safety of women,” said Republican Governor Phil Bryant.

When signing the bill into law on April 16, Governor Bryant said, “Today you see the first step in a movement, I believe, to do what we campaigned on – to say we’re going to try to end abortion in Mississippi.”

He added, “If it closes that clinic, then so be it.”

CLICK ‘LIKE’ IF YOU ARE PRO-LIFE!

In an interview in April Barbara Whitehead, president of Mississippi Right to Life, told LifeSiteNews.com it was common sense to require medical specialists to have “expertise in that field,” and to be able to send women to local hospitals in the case of botched abortions.

In announcing the lawsuit yesterday, Derzis said all three abortionists on her staff are out-of-state OB-GYNs, and only one has admitting privileges at a local hospital. She said the lawsuit, filed on behalf of the abortion clinic by the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, is also asking for more time to comply with the new law.

“We have been attempting to comply with the law, but we just have not had adequate time for the privileges to come through, if they come through,” Derzis told Reuters. “We’ve not been turned down outright, except on a few hospitals that had religious beliefs that didn’t coincide.”

However, Republican Representative Sam Mims said the clinic has had ample time to comply, and that the law will withstand the legal challenge.

“It’s been over 70 days since Gov. Bryant signed this legislation,” Mims said. “For them to say we don’t have time, I just don’t buy that argument.”

Mississippi Health Department spokeswoman Liz Sharlot told The Associated Press the Jackson Women’s Health Organization will be inspected for compliance with the new law on Monday, July 2, noting that the abortion clinic has been aware of the law for months.

“We will be inspecting the facility as soon as the law goes into effect to ensure the facility is in compliance,” Sharlot said.

Sharlot explained if the clinic is found not to be in compliance, it will have 10 working days to submit a plan outlining how it would meet the requirements of the law.

Representative Sam Mims said he does not “want to give the facility 10 extra days to perform abortions” and is consulting attorneys on the legality of such a move, according to the Reuters report.

Source: 

Mississippi’s last abortion clinic faces closure: files desperate last-minute lawsuit

Pope names US archbishop to new post to aid talks with traditionalists


Archbishop J. Augustine Di Noia, center, secretary of the Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments, leaves after celebrating solemn vespers and benediction in the extraordinary form at the Church of the Holy Trinity of the Pilgrims in Rome in 2010. (CNS/Paul Haring)

By Carol Glatz
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — In an effort to aid reconciliation attempts with traditionalist Catholics, Pope Benedict XVI has named U.S. Archbishop J. Augustine Di Noia to fill a newly created post of vice president of the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei.”

“The appointment of a high-ranking prelate to this position is a sign of the Holy Father’s pastoral solicitude for traditionalist Catholics in communion with the Holy See and his strong desire for the reconciliation of those traditionalist communities not in union with the See of Peter,” the Vatican said in a written statement June 26.

The statement, released by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which oversees “Ecclesia Dei,” said the New York-born Dominican is a respected theologian who has devoted much time and attention to the doctrinal issues under review in current talks with the breakaway traditionalist Society of St. Pius X, led by Bishop Bernard Fellay. The society rejects some of the teachings of Vatican II as well as the modernizing reforms, especially to the liturgy, that followed in its wake.

Archbishop Di Noia told Catholic News Service June 26 the Vatican needed to help people who have strong objections to the council see “that these disagreements don’t have to be dividing or keep us from the same Communion table.”

“It is possible to have theological disagreements while remaining in communion with the see of Peter,” he said.

“Part of what we’re saying is that when you read the documents (of Vatican II), you can’t read them from the point of view of some liberal bishops who may have been participants (at the council), you have to read them at face value,” Archbishop Di Noia told CNS. “Given that the Holy Spirit is guiding the church, the documents cannot be in discontinuity with tradition.”

The doctrinal office said the archbishop’s experience as secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments since 2009 “will facilitate the development of certain desired liturgical provisions” in the celebration of the 1962 Roman Missal, commonly known as the Tridentine rite.

Archbishop Di Noia, who said his reassignment from the worship congregation after only three years had left him “flabbergasted,” will be replaced in that job by Bishop Arthur Roche of Leeds, England, the Vatican announced.

The doctrinal congregation also emphasized that Archbishop Di Noia enjoys “broad respect” in the Jewish community, which “will help in addressing some issues that have arisen in the area of Catholic-Jewish relations as the journey toward reconciliation of the traditionalist communities has progressed.”

In addition to the highly publicized position of Bishop Richard Williamson, a traditionalist bishop who denies the Holocaust, public statements by Bishop Fellay, the society’s superior general, leave in doubt whether the society as a whole accepts the entirety of “Nostra Aetate,” the Vatican II document stating that the Jewish people cannot be blamed for the death of Jesus Christ.

“Ecclesia Dei” oversees the pastoral care of Catholics who have a special devotion to the older Latin liturgy. Pope Benedict placed the commission under the doctrinal congregation in 2009 to better address the doctrinal issues emerging from talks between the Vatican and the Society of St. Pius X.

U.S. Cardinal William J. Levada remains president of the commission and Msgr. Guido Pozzo continues as the commission’s secretary.

The archbishop’s appointment is significant as it dedicates additional expertise and manpower to the questions still under consideration by the Society of St. Pius X.

Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, told journalists that the new position is a sign of “the importance and delicate nature of the kind of difficulties” with which the commission is dealing and should not be seen as an indication of how things are proceeding with the society.

Questions under examination when talks began in 2009 included the concept of tradition; the post-Vatican II Roman Missal; the interpretation of Vatican II in continuity with Catholic doctrinal tradition; the themes of the unity of the church and the Catholic principles of ecumenism; the relationship between Christianity and non-Christian religions; and religious freedom.

At a high-level meeting at the Vatican June 13, Vatican officials presented Bishop Fellay with a draft document proposing a personal prelature as the most appropriate instrument for any future canonical recognition of the society, in the event doctrinal differences are resolved. Vatican officials also gave Bishop Fellay their evaluation of the society’s latest statement on those doctrinal differences.

Following the meeting, the society said that unresolved “doctrinal difficulties” with Vatican II and the church’s subsequent liturgical reform could lead to a “new phase of discussions” over possible reconciliation with Rome.

The talks have focused on the wording of a “doctrinal preamble” outlining what the Vatican has said are “some doctrinal principles and criteria for the interpretation of Catholic doctrine necessary to guarantee fidelity” to the formal teaching of the church.

In a June 25 letter to SSPX bishops and priests published on the Internet, the society’s secretary general, Father Christian Thouvenot, wrote that Bishop Fellay considered the Vatican’s latest version of the preamble to be “clearly unacceptable.”

Archbishop Di Noia said his task will be to help resolve the impasse over the terms of an agreement.

“The theological dialogue has gone on for three years but now (the pope) is hoping to find the language or the modality for a reconciliation,” Archbishop Di Noia told CNS. “We’re at the stage of finessing, to help them find a formula which respects their own theological integrity.”

“It seems to everyone that (a reconciliation) is close, but now it needs a kind of push,” he said.

When Archbishop Di Noia was undersecretary of the doctrinal congregation, he was involved with the pope’s establishment in 2009 of the personal ordinariates, special structures for former Anglicans who want to be in full communion with the Catholic Church while preserving aspects of their Anglican spiritual and liturgical heritage.

“It’s possible that (Pope Benedict) had that experience in view” when selecting him for his latest job, the archbishop said.

Blessed John Paul II named then-Father Di Noia to the No. 3 spot at the doctrinal congregation in 2002, when it was headed by then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. The archbishop has worked extensively with Pope Benedict, especially as a member of the International Theological Commission when the current pope was its president.

- – -

Contributing to this story was Francis X. Rocca in Rome.

Originally posted here: 

Pope names US archbishop to new post to aid talks with traditionalists

Proposed Delaware bill could punish spanking with two years in jail

DOVER, Delaware, June 28, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A law passed on June 19 in the Delaware Senate, Bill 234, could make spanking a child a crime punishable by up to two years in jail. The bill is now being reviewed by a judiciary committee in the General Assembly.

The bill, sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Patricia M. Blevins, redefines the term “physical injury” in the child abuse and neglect laws to broadly include any act that causes “pain.”

“This bill establishes the offense of Child Abuse,” the proposed legislation states. “These new statutes combine current statutes and redefine physical injury and serious physical injury to reflect the medical realities of pain and impairment suffered by children.”

The push for the legislation is reportedly being driven by state Attorney General Beau Biden, the son of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden.

“Far too many children are the victims of abuse, neglect and assault and [this bill] will go a long way to better protect the children of this state,” said Biden.

However, the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) has blasted the bill. The family rights organization says it “opposes this bill as a violation of the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children, including the long-recognized right to administer reasonable corporal discipline.”

The HSLDA points out that currently Delaware law permits a parent to use force to punish a child for misconduct, but it prohibits any act that is likely to cause or does cause physical injury. By redefining “physical injury” to include the infliction of any pain on a child, even the reasonable use of spanking would likely become a crime in Delaware punishable by imprisonment.

Under the proposed law, a parent causing “physical injury” (e.g., pain) to a child under age 18 would be guilty of a class A misdemeanor and subject to one year in prison. A parent causing pain to a child who was three years of age or younger would be guilty of a class G felony and subject to two years in prison.

The HSLDA warns that if the proposed law passes the House, “Delaware would become the first state in the nation to outlaw corporal discipline of children by their parents.”

The organization states it is working with the Delaware Home Education Association and the Delaware Family Policy Council to bring about a defeat of this legislation.

The full text of Senate Bill 234 is available here.

Contact information:

Senator Patricia M. Blevins, Senate Majority Leader
Legislative Hall Office
P.O. Box 1401
Dover, DE 19903
Phone: (302) 744-4133
Email: Patricia.Blevins@state.de.us

House of Representatives
Rep. Robert F. Gilligan (D), Speaker of the House
Phone: (302) 744-4351
Email: Robert.Gilligan@state.de.us

Read the article:  

Proposed Delaware bill could punish spanking with two years in jail

British Medical Association maintains opposition to euthanasia despite pressure

LONDON, June 27, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A motion to push the British Medical Association to take a “natural” stance on euthanasia and assisted suicide was voted down at the doctors’ union annual meeting in Bournemouth on Wednesday. The motion was put forward by activists as part of a larger effort to loosen the assisted suicide law in Parliament.

Attempts to legalise assisted suicide, which remains in the criminal code but virtually impossible to prosecute under current rules, should be actively and formally opposed by physicians’ associations, the membership of the union membership decided.

Last week, the British Medical Journal, the unofficial voice of the BMA, published three articles, two of which were by leaders of the pressure group Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying (HPAD), pushing for assisted suicide. The third was an official BMJ editorial, also in favor of assisted suicide.

In the BMJ editorial, Professor Raymond Tallis, a retired professor of geriatric medicine and chairman of HPAD, wrote, “At the heart of the case for neutrality is that the decriminalisation of assisted dying should be a matter for society as a whole to decide, and no particular group should have disproportionate influence on this decision.”

CLICK ‘LIKE’ IF YOU ARE PRO-LIFE!

Originally, euthanasia lobbyists had put forward 14 separate motions asking the BMA to adopt official “neutrality” on efforts to liberalise the law. The rejected motion said, “that this meeting: i) believes that assisted dying is a matter for society and not for the medical profession; ii) believes that the BMA should adopt a neutral position on change in the law on assisted dying.”

This is the second attempt; nine motions asking for the BMA to adopt a “neutral” position were brought forward at last year’s meeting.

Opposing the motion, Dr. Dai Samuels said assisting a suicide was not an “act of kindness” but was akin to murder.

“I simply stand for looking after my patients and providing high-quality care. I do not consider the killing of patients, whatever the reason, is justified. That is murder and I cannot commit that offence,” Samuels said.

Dr. Hamish Meldrum, the BMA’s outgoing chairman, called the proposal “probably the worst of all options,” saying it would do nothing but exclude doctors from the debate.

“The medical profession is not only part of society,” he said, “but it would be members of the medical profession that would have to carry out the wishes of society were there to be a change in the law.”

“I think adopting a neutral position is probably the worst of all options. Neutrality does tend to exclude us from the argument, an argument which would have a huge bearing on the working lives of doctors.”

Meldrun said that he does not come from a “strong religious view” on the issue, but that in 40 years of general practice he had always “been able, in almost every occasion, to support my patients when they were dying without having to actively end their lives.”

The BMA’s refusal, again, to back away from the euthanasia question is likely to put a damper on further attempts to liberalise the law. Groups in favor are planning a mass lobbying effort in Parliament for which the passage of the motions at the BMA meeting was intended to be a wedge. Euthanasia activists are also waiting on a High Court decision in the case of Tony Nicklinson, a paralysed man who is petitioning the courts to allow his wife to legally kill him. Nicklinson’s lawyers presented their arguments last week.

Dr. Peter Saunders, CEO of the Christian Medical Fellowship, said, “In rejecting this move the BMA has sent out a strong message that doctors must play a leading role in this debate which could otherwise be far too easily swayed by celebrity endorsement and media outlets who have consistently acted as the cheerleaders for assisted suicide and euthanasia.”

Saunders called the number of motions put forward at the meeting an “unprecedented” assault on medical ethics. A total of 45 motions on ethics were presented at this year’s meeting, of which 33 dealt with either abortion or euthanasia. Of these, 20 motions dealt with euthanasia or assisted suicide, with 14 supporting a relaxation of the BMA’s position and only 6 supporting the current position opposing a change in the law.

Saunders noted that, because it is a trade union, the British Medical Association is susceptible to such moves by small pressure groups. The good news, according to the CMF, is that this is the work of a very small number of activists whose groups are interconnected. Professor Raymond Tallis is the head of HPAD but is also a member of Britain’s leading euthanasia campaign group, Dignity in Dying, formerly the Voluntary Euthanasia Society. Tallis is one of only 520 registered members of HPAD, a number that amounts to 0.25 percent of all working physicians in the UK.

According to the newsletter sent to supporters, DID is planning a mass lobby of Parliament July 4, to coincide with a day conference where British celebrities like Sir Terry Pratchett will address supporters. Among the legislative plans is the launching of a private members’ bill that was drafted by euthanasia activists that they hope will usher in another public consultation.

“Their glossy propaganda inserts are spilling out of commercial publications; they are spending hundreds of thousands; and clearly believe this is their year,” Saunders said.

Continue reading: 

British Medical Association maintains opposition to euthanasia despite pressure

Liechtenstein’s monarchy fears loss of veto


Liechtenstein’s monarchy fears loss of veto

Catholic royal family waits for outcome of July 1 referendum

Prince Hans-Adam II is one of the world’s most powerful monarchs. (Liechtenstein Tourism)

According to

Maclean’s

magazine, the citizens of the Principality of Liechtenstein will have an official say on whether their monarch can veto referendum results July 1.



Liechtenstein’s official flag.

The voting cycle began when Prince Hans-Adam II, the ruler of Europe’s fourth smallest country, threatened to overturn a referendum to legalize abortion in the country.

However, he dropped that threat when the vote failed to pass. The Alpine tax haven is sandwiched between Switzerland, and Austria.

Catholics make up 80 per cent of the population (36,000). Read the

full story

here.