Daily Archives: May 30, 2012

Sick, twisted, bastard

Sick, twisted, bastard


– May 30th, 2012

luka magnotta

Help police find this man

This is going to be one of those stories that I wish I knew less about every day.

What started with a bizarre story of a severed foot being mailed to Conservative Party HQ in Ottawa has morphed into so much more – as if getting a severed foot in the mail wasn’t bad enough. Now police are looking for a man with a bizarre history that includes links to Karla Holmolka, claims of being a male model and a bi-sexual porn star. Here’s some detail from the Sun News story…

In a grisly twist to the case, a graphic and deeply disturbing video has emerged which is purported to show the murder and dismemberment. A Montreal police source confirmed cops are in possession of a video, which also includes cannibalism, but would not say if it is the same video.

The graphic video online shows a man being stabbed to death with an ice pick and then being cut into pieces. The video was shot inside an apartment that bears a close resemblance to the unit in west-end Montreal that’s at the centre of the homicide investigation.

In a strange twist we already had footage of this man in our files. Magnotta had been interviewed by the Sun’s Joe Warmington back in 2007 when there were claims he was dating Homolka, claims he denied.

You can read Warmington’s column from the time here.

I was asked why we would give this freak the time of day and the attention that he so obviously craves. The answer is simple. He’s still on the loose.

If Luka Rocco Magnotta is responsible for these crimes then he must be brought to justice. If he is not, then he has some explaining to do about the bizarre videos he has posted online that seem to show a murder.

Excerpt from:  

Sick, twisted, bastard

Sick, twisted, bastard

Sick, twisted, bastard


– May 30th, 2012

luka magnotta

Help police find this man

This is going to be one of those stories that I wish I knew less about every day.

What started with a bizarre story of a severed foot being mailed to Conservative Party HQ in Ottawa has morphed into so much more – as if getting a severed foot in the mail wasn’t bad enough. Now police are looking for a man with a bizarre history that includes links to Karla Holmolka, claims of being a male model and a bi-sexual porn star. Here’s some detail from the Sun News story…

In a grisly twist to the case, a graphic and deeply disturbing video has emerged which is purported to show the murder and dismemberment. A Montreal police source confirmed cops are in possession of a video, which also includes cannibalism, but would not say if it is the same video.

The graphic video online shows a man being stabbed to death with an ice pick and then being cut into pieces. The video was shot inside an apartment that bears a close resemblance to the unit in west-end Montreal that’s at the centre of the homicide investigation.

In a strange twist we already had footage of this man in our files. Magnotta had been interviewed by the Sun’s Joe Warmington back in 2007 when there were claims he was dating Homolka, claims he denied.

You can read Warmington’s column from the time here.

I was asked why we would give this freak the time of day and the attention that he so obviously craves. The answer is simple. He’s still on the loose.

If Luka Rocco Magnotta is responsible for these crimes then he must be brought to justice. If he is not, then he has some explaining to do about the bizarre videos he has posted online that seem to show a murder.

Visit site:

Sick, twisted, bastard

Some Observations re. GSAs

The whole “Gay-Straight Alliance” nonsense is something on the minds of Ontario Catholics. Sorry if you aren’t an Ontario Catholic and find this boring.

1. McGuinty is pursuing this because he thinks it will make him look like a human rights hero and, thus, pay off at the polls. Normal type of thinking for a politician. Is he correct? Only time will tell. This poll says ‘no,’ he is very incorrect. Apparently he might be going to the polls as a guy who doesn’t respect different viewpoints. Certainly the age of same-sex heroes is over. No one even really thinks that way about Obama. The ‘first to do x’ about gay this and that is getting a little silly now. One of the men in my wedding party went on to become the ‘first out gay Mountie.’ Do you know his name? Bet you don’t. And no one will remember McGuinty in about five minutes.

2. The pathology closest to homosexuality is pedophilia. Why are we expected to embrace the one and abhor the other? I have compassion for every one who suffers. That is very Christian of me.

3. Why would one ever think that a Catholic school would need a club for gays? Because people have bought into the lie that Christians treat gays poorly. It is a lie created by Hollywood. There is no statistics proof of it, nor can there be since the Church teaches that those who experience same-sex attraction must be treated with great compassion.

4. It is true that there are people who experience same-sex attraction. Why should such a psychological state be privileged as per se virtuous? There are no rational grounds for this, thus there must be non-rational grounds for it. Part of it is hatred for Christianity, but part of it is the strong need to feel good and/or important. Wouldn’t it be great if there was a group that was being mistreated and you stood up for them? The problem is, the Catholic Church treats people with same-sex attraction very well – exceedingly well – and, you would not be helping a disenfranchised group at all, but a group with a lot of wealth and political power.

5. Homosexuality is a very problematic lifestyle. That it can yet be considered ‘healthy’ all hinges on the role that social ostracization plays. If one judges the Church negatively for failing to see the healthiness of homosexuality, upon what do they base their conviction that it is healthy? Studies have typically indicated it is very unhealthy. See here too. In this light, celebrating homosexuality seems an awful lot like celebrating smoking.

6. These confused young people who say they have same-sex attraction (SSA) are being treated like pawns by the McGuinty government. People who are experiencing psychological turmoil should not be thrown into the public gaze like this. Now, of course, there are two types of young people who identify as SSA – genuinely confused adolescents, and those who just want any kind of attention, who don’t have a genuine bone in their body. The latter group is unfortunately the larger one. My comments here refer to the former group, those who are genuinely struggling. Homosexualists don’t distinguish between the two, won’t admit there are these two groups.

7. It all comes down to whether or not SSA is normal or not, good or not. The philosophical inconsistencies of the popular approach to it (as exemplified by the McGuinty Government) are so astonishing as to require pages of analysis themselves – maybe some other time. Is it normal? No, it is normal for the sexes to be attracted to that which can lead to the procreation of new life. That is the biological norm of organism that reproduce sexually. Is it moral? Catholicism privileges with moral legitimacy only married, heterosexual intercourse aimed at procreation. You don’t have to share this view. In that case, don’t attend a Catholic school. I wouldn’t attend a Muslim school, but I would recognize its right to exist.

8. In terms of recognizing differences, even Medieval Christians usually recognized the right to exist, to maintain schools, to worship, of a people who denied the divinity of Christ, i.e., the Jews. When so-called modern, educated, tolerant people cannot recognize the right of Catholics to practice their Faith they are worse than the bigoted Medievals they excoriate. That is a very low bar, and there is no shame greater than the one of failing to meet it.

9. There is no such thing as moral evolution. Change, yes, but not evolution. The greatest lesson that the great work, Time Machine, of H.G. Wells, teaches is that evolution doesn’t necessary lead you where you want. That is a lesson not only for us in terms of biological evolution, but of social evolution too. People who speak of the evolution of human consciousness have imported an unfortunate error of Karl Marx. Marx’s view of history was Christian eschatology on crack. The Christian idea of progress is towards the extraneous telos that is Christ, where we will be transformed beyond ourselves without ourselves. In other words, men will not make men better, God will. Marx was closer to the truth when he said that the means of production (our culture) will produce our moral view point. Thus, women in the work force, ‘homosexual marriage,’ are tied to a certain type of industrial status. What this means is, change the type of culture change the ethos. You can imagine the ethos changing regarding ‘homosexual marriage,’ and it won’t take a very big structural change to bring this re-imagining about. And the Church will still be here, as it has from the time of the Roman Empire, to the Medieval feudalism, to Early Modern mercantilism, to the Industrial Revolution, to the rise and fall of Marxism, to the age of the microchip and after. Today’s liberal is tomorrow’s conservative. The only problem is, history will not yield.

Excerpt from: 

Some Observations re. GSAs

‘Hurrah’ to the Cardinal!

Jump to original:  

‘Hurrah’ to the Cardinal!

Three abortion groups admit sex-selective abortion a problem in U.S.

Of course, none of these groups think sex-selective abortions should be banned.

Until now pro-abortion groups have opposed state and federal bans against sex selective abortions by simply denying they exist, for instance Jezebel only six days ago:

[I]n the U.S., there’s no evidence or noteworthy numbers to indicate that women are having abortions based on the sex of the infant….

Apparently, abortion industry leaders have decided they can no longer carry on the ruse. Public opinion is so persuaded against sex-selective abortion, the other side must have decided they have to enter the conversation in order to remain players and try to influence the outcome.

The first to fall was Guttmacher Institute in its Spring 2012 Policy Review, published sometime after May 1:

There is some evidence – although limited and inconclusive – to suggest that the practice may also occur among Asian communities in the United States….

[

T]wo studies using 2000 U.S. census data to examine sex ratios among Chinese-, Indian- and Korean-American families found that although the ratio for first-born children in such families was normal, there was evidence of son preference in second- and third-order births, if the older children were daughters.

Then yesterday fell RH Reality Check:

Son preference, missing girls, sex selection: We may seek to label these Chinese or Indian issues, but they exist here in America. And with anti-choice crusaders desperate to destroy Planned Parenthood Federation of America, America’s leading provider of affordable reproductive health care for women, the purportedly spreading practice of sex-selective abortion is back in the news….

However, as birth order rises, apparently so does selection – at least, in certain ethnic groups. With U.S. 2000 Census data, researchers investigating Korean, Chinese, and Indian communities found that, after one girl, parents have as many as 1.17 boys per girl the second time. With two girls at home, this goes up to 1.51 boys per girl for the third child. These skewed ratios aren’t present among other ethnic groups in America.

Finally, NARAL in an email alert and petition drive launched today conceded:

Sex-Selection abortion is a real problem – and it needs to be addressed.

Of course, none of these groups think sex-selective abortions should be banned. But what is it they say, acknowledging a problem is the first step toward solving it?

[Graphic via RH Reality Check]

Reprinted with permission from JillStanek.com

Read this article: 

Three abortion groups admit sex-selective abortion a problem in U.S.

Gendercide in America: Planned Parenthoods War on Baby Girls Exposed by Live Action – U.s. – Catholic Online

See original article here:

Gendercide in America: Planned Parenthoods War on Baby Girls Exposed by Live Action – U.s. – Catholic Online

Everything you need to know about next week’s Transit of Venus – with thanks to Deep Diver for reminding me of this cosmic event!

Visit site:  

Everything you need to know about next week’s Transit of Venus – with thanks to Deep Diver for reminding me of this cosmic event!

CATHOLIC NEWS WORLD : WEDNESDAY MAY 30, 2012

Information:

Feast Day: May 30
Born: 6 January c. 1412, Domrémy, France
Died: May 30, 1431, Rouen, France
Canonized: May 16, 1920, St. Peter’s Basilica, Rome by Pope Benedict
XV
Patron of: France; martyrs; captives; militants; people ridiculed for
their piety; prisoners; soldiers; Women Appointed for Voluntary Emergency
Service; Women’s Army Corps
Savior of France and the
national heroine of that country, Joan of Arc lives on in the imagination of the
world as a symbol of that integrity of purpose that makes one die for what one
believes. Jeanne la Pucelle, the Maid, is the shining example of what a brave
spirit can accomplish in the world of men and events. The saint was born on the
feast of the Epiphany, January 6, 1412, at Domremy, a village in the rich
province of Champagne, on the Meuse River in northeast France. She came of sound
peasant stock. Her father, Jacques d’Arc, was a good man, though rather morose;
his wife was a gentle, affectionate mother to their five children. From her the
two daughters of the family received careful training in all household duties.
“In sewing and spinning,” Joan declared towards the end of her short life, “I
fear no woman.” She whose destiny it was to save France was a well-brought-up
country girl who, in common with most people of the time, never had an
opportunity to learn to read or write. The little we know of her childhood is
contained in the impressive and often touching testimony to her piety and
dutiful conduct in the depositions presented during the process for her
rehabilitation in I456, twenty-five years after her death. Priests and former
playmates then recalled her love of prayer and faithful attendance at church,
her frequent use of the Sacraments, kindness to sick people, and sympathy for
poor wayfarers, to whom she sometimes gave up her own bed. “She was so good,”
the neighbors said, “that all the village loved her.”

Joan’s early life,
however, must have been disturbed by the confusion of the period and the
disasters befalling her beloved land. The Hundred Years War between England and
France was still running its dismal course. Whole provinces were being lost to
the English and the Burgundians, while the weak and irresolute government of
France offered no real resistance. A frontier village like Domremy, bordering on
Lorraine, was especially exposed to the invaders. On one occasion, at least,
Joan fled with her parents to Neufchatel, eight miles distant, to escape a raid
of Burgundians who sacked Domremy and set fire to the church, which was near
Joan’s home.

The child had been three years old when in 1415 King Henry V
of England had started the latest chain of troubles by invading Normandy and
claiming the crown of the insane king, Charles VI. France, already in the throes
of civil war between the supporters of the Dukes of Burgundy and Orleans, had
been in no condition to resist, and when the Duke of Burgundy was treacherously
killed by the Dauphin’s servants, most of his faction joined the British forces.
King Henry and King Charles both died in 1422, but the war continued. The Duke
of Bedford, as regent for the infant king of England, pushed the campaign
vigorously, one town after another falling to him or to his Burgundian allies.
Most of the country north of the Loire was in English hands. Charles VII, the
Dauphin, as he was still called, considered his position hopeless, for the enemy
even occupied the city of Rheims, where he should have been crowned. He spent
his time away from the fighting lines in frivolous pastimes with his
court.

Joan was in her fourteenth year when she heard the first of the
unearthly voices, which, she felt sure, brought her messages from God. One day
while she was at work in the garden, she heard a voice, accompanied by a blaze
of light; after this, she vowed to remain a virgin and to lead a godly life.
Afterwards, for a period of two years, the voices increased in number, and she
was able to see her heavenly visitors, whom she identified as St. Michael, St.
Catherine of Alexandria, and St. Margaret, the three saints whose ages stood in
the church at Domremy. Gradually they revealed to her the purpose of their
visits: she, an ignorant peasant girl, was given the high mission of saving her
country; she was to take Charles to Rheims to be crowned, and then drive out the
English! We do not know just when Joan decided to obey the voices; she spoke
little of them at home, fearing her stern father’s disapproval. But by May,
1428, the voices had become insistent and explicit. Joan, now sixteen, must
first go quickly to Robert de Baudricourt, who commanded the Dauphin’s forces in
the neighboring town of Vaucouleurs and say that she was appointed to lead the
Dauphin to his crowning. An uncle accompanied Joan, but the errand proved
fruitless; Baudricourt laughed and said that her father should give her a
whipping. Thus rebuffed, Joan went back to Domremy, but the voices gave her no
rest. When she protested that she was a poor girl who could neither ride nor
fight, they answered, “It is God who commands it.”

At last, she was
impelled to return secretly to Baudricourt, whose skepticism was shaken, for
news had reached him of just the sort of serious French defeat that Joan had
predicted. The military position was now desperate, for Orleans, the last
remaining French stronghold on the Loire, was invested by the English and seemed
likely to fall. Baudricourt now agreed to send Joan to the Dauphin, and gave her
an escort of three soldiers. It was her own idea to put on male attire, as a
protection. On March 6, 1429, the party reached Chinon, where the Dauphin was
staying, and two days later Joan was admitted to the royal presence. To test
her, Charles had disguised himself as one of his courtiers, but she identified
him without hesitation and, by a sign which only she and he understood,
convinced him that her mission was authentic.
The ministers were less easy to
convince. When Joan asked for soldiers to lead to the relief of Orleans, she was
opposed by La Tremouille, one of Charles’ favorites, and by others, who regarded
the girl either as a crazy visionary or a scheming impostor. To settle the
question, they sent her to Poitiers, to be questioned by a commission of
theologians. After an exhaustive examination lasting for three weeks, the
learned ecclesiastics pronounced Joan honest, good, and virtuous; they counseled
Charles to make prudent use of her services. Thus vindicated, Joan returned full
of courage of Chinon, and plans went forward to equip her with a small force, A
banner was made, bearing at her request, the words, “Jesus Maria,” along with a
figure of God the Father, to whom two kneeling angels were presenting a
fleur-de-lis, the royal emblem of France. On April 27 the army left Blois with
Joan, now known to her troops as “La Pucelle,” the Maid, clad in dazzling white
armor Joan was a handsome, healthy, well-built girl, with a smiling face, and
dark hair which had been cut short. She had now learned to ride well, but,
naturally, she had no knowledge of military tactics. Yet her gallantry and valor
kindled the soldiers and with them she broke through the English line and
entered Orleans on April 29. Her presence in the city greatly heartened the
French garrison. By May 8 the English fort outside Orleans had been captured and
the siege raised. Conspicuous in her white armor, Joan had led the attack and
had been slightly wounded in the shoulder by an arrow.

Her desire was to
follow up these first successes with even more daring assaults, for the voices
had told her that she would not live long, but La Tremouille and the archbishop
of Rheims were in favor of negotiating. However, the Maid was allowed to join in
a short campaign along the Loire with the Duc d’Alencon, one of her devoted
supporters. It ended with a victory at Patay, in which the English forces under
Sir John Falstolf suffered a crushing defeat. She now urged the immediate
coronation of the Dauphin, since the road to Rheims had been practically
cleared. The French leaders argued and dallied, and finally consented to follow
her to Rheims. There, on July 17, 1429, Charles VII was duly crowned, Joan
standing proudly behind him with her banner.

The mission entrusted to her
by the heavenly voices was now only half fulfilled, for the English were still
in France. Charles, weak and irresolute, did not follow up these auspicious
happenings, and an attack on Paris failed, mainly for lack of his promised
support and presence. During the action Joan was again wounded and had to be
dragged to safety by the Duc d’Alencon. There followed winter’s truce, which
Joan spent for the most part in the company of the court, where she was regarded
with ill-concealed suspicion. When hostilities were renewed in the spring, she
hurried off to the relief of Compiegne, which was besieged by the Burgundians.
Entering the city at sunrise on May 23, 1430, she led against the enemy later in
the day. It failed, and through miscalculation on the part of the governor, the
drawbridge over which her forces were retiring was lifted too soon, leaving her
and a number of soldiers outside, at the mercy of the enemy. Joan was dragged
from her horse and led to the quarters of John of Luxembourg, one of whose
soldiers had been her captor. From then until the late autumn she remained the
prisoner of the Duke of Burgundy, incarcerated in a high tower of the castle of
the Luxembourgs. In a desperate attempt to escape, the girl leapt from the
tower, landing on soft turf, stunned and bruised. It was thought a miracle that
she had not been killed.

Never, during that period or afterwards, was any
effort made to secure Joan’s release by King Charles or his ministers. She had
been a strange and disturbing ally, and they seemed content to leave her to her
fate. But the English were to have her, and on November 21, the Burgundians
accepted a large indemnity and gave her into English hands. They could not take
her life for defeating them in war, but they could have her condemned as a
sorceress and a heretic. Had she not been able to inspire the French with the
Devil’s own courage? In an age when belief in witchcraft and demons was general,
the charge did not seem too preposterous. Already the English and Burgundian
soldiers had been attributing their reverses to her spells.
In a cell in the
castle of Rouen to which Joan was moved two days before Christmas, she was
chained to a plank bed, and watched over night and day. On February 21, 1431,
she appeared for the first time before a court of the Inquisition. It was
presided over by Pierre Cauchon, bishop of Beauvais, a ruthless, ambitious man
who apparently hoped through English influence to become archbishop of Rouen.
The other judges were lawyers and theologians who had been carefully selected by
Cauchon. In the course of six public and nine private sessions, covering a
period of ten weeks, the prisoner was cross-examined as to her visions and
voices, her assumption of male attire, her faith, and her willingness to submit
to the Church. Alone and undefended, the nineteen-year-old girl bore herself
fearlessly, her shrewd answers, honesty, piety, and accurate memory often
proving embarrassing to these severe inquisitors. Through her ignorance of
theological terms, on a few occasions she was betrayed into making damaging
statements. At the end of the hearings, a set of articles was drawn up by the
clerks and submitted to the judges, who thereupon pronounced her revelations the
work of the Devil and Joan herself a heretic. The theological faculty of the
University of Paris approved the court’s verdict.

In final deliberations
the tribunal voted to hand Joan over to the secular arm for burning if she still
refused to confess she had been a witch and had lied about hearing voices. This
she steadfastly refused to do, though physically exhausted and threatened with
torture. Only when she was led out into the churchyard of St. Ouen before a
great crowd, to hear the sentence committing her to the flames, did she kneel
down and admit she had testified falsely. She was then taken back to prison.
Under pressure from her jailers, she had some time earlier put off the male
attire, which her accusers seemed to find particularly objectionable. Now,
either by her own choice or as the result of a trick played upon her by those
who wanted her death, she resumed it. When Bishop Cauchon, with some witnesses,
visited her in her cell to question her further, she had recovered from her
weakness, and once more she claimed that God had truly sent her and that the
voices had come from Him. Cauchon was well pleased with this turn of
events.

On Tuesday, May 29, 1431, the judges, after hearing Cauchon’s
report, condemned Joan as a relapsed heretic and delivered her to the English.
The next morning at eight o’clock she was led out into the market place of Rouen
to be burned at the stake. As the faggots were lighted, a Dominican friar, at
her request, held up a cross before her eyes and, while the flames leapt higher
and higher, she was heard to call on the name of Jesus. John Tressart, one of
King Henry’s secretaries, viewed the scene with horror and was probably joined
in spirit by others when he exclaimed remorsefully, “We are lost! We have burned
a saint!” Joan’s ashes were cast into the Seine.

Twenty-five years later,
when the English had been driven out, the Pope at Avignon ordered a rehearing of
the case. By that time Joan was being hailed as the savior of France. Witnesses
were heard and depositions made, and in consequence the trial was pronounced
irregular. She was formally rehabilitated as a true and faithful daughter of the
Church. From a short time after her death up to the French Revolution, a local
festival in honor of the Maid was held at Orleans on May 8, commemorating the
day the siege was raised. The festival was reestablished by Napoleon I. In 1920
the French Republic declared May 8 a day of national celebration. Joan was
beatified in 1909 and canonized by Benedict XV in
1919.

Source: 

CATHOLIC NEWS WORLD : WEDNESDAY MAY 30, 2012

CATHOLIC NEWS WORLD : WEDNESDAY MAY 30, 2012

Information:

Feast Day: May 30
Born: 6 January c. 1412, Domrémy, France
Died: May 30, 1431, Rouen, France
Canonized: May 16, 1920, St. Peter’s Basilica, Rome by Pope Benedict
XV
Patron of: France; martyrs; captives; militants; people ridiculed for
their piety; prisoners; soldiers; Women Appointed for Voluntary Emergency
Service; Women’s Army Corps
Savior of France and the
national heroine of that country, Joan of Arc lives on in the imagination of the
world as a symbol of that integrity of purpose that makes one die for what one
believes. Jeanne la Pucelle, the Maid, is the shining example of what a brave
spirit can accomplish in the world of men and events. The saint was born on the
feast of the Epiphany, January 6, 1412, at Domremy, a village in the rich
province of Champagne, on the Meuse River in northeast France. She came of sound
peasant stock. Her father, Jacques d’Arc, was a good man, though rather morose;
his wife was a gentle, affectionate mother to their five children. From her the
two daughters of the family received careful training in all household duties.
“In sewing and spinning,” Joan declared towards the end of her short life, “I
fear no woman.” She whose destiny it was to save France was a well-brought-up
country girl who, in common with most people of the time, never had an
opportunity to learn to read or write. The little we know of her childhood is
contained in the impressive and often touching testimony to her piety and
dutiful conduct in the depositions presented during the process for her
rehabilitation in I456, twenty-five years after her death. Priests and former
playmates then recalled her love of prayer and faithful attendance at church,
her frequent use of the Sacraments, kindness to sick people, and sympathy for
poor wayfarers, to whom she sometimes gave up her own bed. “She was so good,”
the neighbors said, “that all the village loved her.”

Joan’s early life,
however, must have been disturbed by the confusion of the period and the
disasters befalling her beloved land. The Hundred Years War between England and
France was still running its dismal course. Whole provinces were being lost to
the English and the Burgundians, while the weak and irresolute government of
France offered no real resistance. A frontier village like Domremy, bordering on
Lorraine, was especially exposed to the invaders. On one occasion, at least,
Joan fled with her parents to Neufchatel, eight miles distant, to escape a raid
of Burgundians who sacked Domremy and set fire to the church, which was near
Joan’s home.

The child had been three years old when in 1415 King Henry V
of England had started the latest chain of troubles by invading Normandy and
claiming the crown of the insane king, Charles VI. France, already in the throes
of civil war between the supporters of the Dukes of Burgundy and Orleans, had
been in no condition to resist, and when the Duke of Burgundy was treacherously
killed by the Dauphin’s servants, most of his faction joined the British forces.
King Henry and King Charles both died in 1422, but the war continued. The Duke
of Bedford, as regent for the infant king of England, pushed the campaign
vigorously, one town after another falling to him or to his Burgundian allies.
Most of the country north of the Loire was in English hands. Charles VII, the
Dauphin, as he was still called, considered his position hopeless, for the enemy
even occupied the city of Rheims, where he should have been crowned. He spent
his time away from the fighting lines in frivolous pastimes with his
court.

Joan was in her fourteenth year when she heard the first of the
unearthly voices, which, she felt sure, brought her messages from God. One day
while she was at work in the garden, she heard a voice, accompanied by a blaze
of light; after this, she vowed to remain a virgin and to lead a godly life.
Afterwards, for a period of two years, the voices increased in number, and she
was able to see her heavenly visitors, whom she identified as St. Michael, St.
Catherine of Alexandria, and St. Margaret, the three saints whose ages stood in
the church at Domremy. Gradually they revealed to her the purpose of their
visits: she, an ignorant peasant girl, was given the high mission of saving her
country; she was to take Charles to Rheims to be crowned, and then drive out the
English! We do not know just when Joan decided to obey the voices; she spoke
little of them at home, fearing her stern father’s disapproval. But by May,
1428, the voices had become insistent and explicit. Joan, now sixteen, must
first go quickly to Robert de Baudricourt, who commanded the Dauphin’s forces in
the neighboring town of Vaucouleurs and say that she was appointed to lead the
Dauphin to his crowning. An uncle accompanied Joan, but the errand proved
fruitless; Baudricourt laughed and said that her father should give her a
whipping. Thus rebuffed, Joan went back to Domremy, but the voices gave her no
rest. When she protested that she was a poor girl who could neither ride nor
fight, they answered, “It is God who commands it.”

At last, she was
impelled to return secretly to Baudricourt, whose skepticism was shaken, for
news had reached him of just the sort of serious French defeat that Joan had
predicted. The military position was now desperate, for Orleans, the last
remaining French stronghold on the Loire, was invested by the English and seemed
likely to fall. Baudricourt now agreed to send Joan to the Dauphin, and gave her
an escort of three soldiers. It was her own idea to put on male attire, as a
protection. On March 6, 1429, the party reached Chinon, where the Dauphin was
staying, and two days later Joan was admitted to the royal presence. To test
her, Charles had disguised himself as one of his courtiers, but she identified
him without hesitation and, by a sign which only she and he understood,
convinced him that her mission was authentic.
The ministers were less easy to
convince. When Joan asked for soldiers to lead to the relief of Orleans, she was
opposed by La Tremouille, one of Charles’ favorites, and by others, who regarded
the girl either as a crazy visionary or a scheming impostor. To settle the
question, they sent her to Poitiers, to be questioned by a commission of
theologians. After an exhaustive examination lasting for three weeks, the
learned ecclesiastics pronounced Joan honest, good, and virtuous; they counseled
Charles to make prudent use of her services. Thus vindicated, Joan returned full
of courage of Chinon, and plans went forward to equip her with a small force, A
banner was made, bearing at her request, the words, “Jesus Maria,” along with a
figure of God the Father, to whom two kneeling angels were presenting a
fleur-de-lis, the royal emblem of France. On April 27 the army left Blois with
Joan, now known to her troops as “La Pucelle,” the Maid, clad in dazzling white
armor Joan was a handsome, healthy, well-built girl, with a smiling face, and
dark hair which had been cut short. She had now learned to ride well, but,
naturally, she had no knowledge of military tactics. Yet her gallantry and valor
kindled the soldiers and with them she broke through the English line and
entered Orleans on April 29. Her presence in the city greatly heartened the
French garrison. By May 8 the English fort outside Orleans had been captured and
the siege raised. Conspicuous in her white armor, Joan had led the attack and
had been slightly wounded in the shoulder by an arrow.

Her desire was to
follow up these first successes with even more daring assaults, for the voices
had told her that she would not live long, but La Tremouille and the archbishop
of Rheims were in favor of negotiating. However, the Maid was allowed to join in
a short campaign along the Loire with the Duc d’Alencon, one of her devoted
supporters. It ended with a victory at Patay, in which the English forces under
Sir John Falstolf suffered a crushing defeat. She now urged the immediate
coronation of the Dauphin, since the road to Rheims had been practically
cleared. The French leaders argued and dallied, and finally consented to follow
her to Rheims. There, on July 17, 1429, Charles VII was duly crowned, Joan
standing proudly behind him with her banner.

The mission entrusted to her
by the heavenly voices was now only half fulfilled, for the English were still
in France. Charles, weak and irresolute, did not follow up these auspicious
happenings, and an attack on Paris failed, mainly for lack of his promised
support and presence. During the action Joan was again wounded and had to be
dragged to safety by the Duc d’Alencon. There followed winter’s truce, which
Joan spent for the most part in the company of the court, where she was regarded
with ill-concealed suspicion. When hostilities were renewed in the spring, she
hurried off to the relief of Compiegne, which was besieged by the Burgundians.
Entering the city at sunrise on May 23, 1430, she led against the enemy later in
the day. It failed, and through miscalculation on the part of the governor, the
drawbridge over which her forces were retiring was lifted too soon, leaving her
and a number of soldiers outside, at the mercy of the enemy. Joan was dragged
from her horse and led to the quarters of John of Luxembourg, one of whose
soldiers had been her captor. From then until the late autumn she remained the
prisoner of the Duke of Burgundy, incarcerated in a high tower of the castle of
the Luxembourgs. In a desperate attempt to escape, the girl leapt from the
tower, landing on soft turf, stunned and bruised. It was thought a miracle that
she had not been killed.

Never, during that period or afterwards, was any
effort made to secure Joan’s release by King Charles or his ministers. She had
been a strange and disturbing ally, and they seemed content to leave her to her
fate. But the English were to have her, and on November 21, the Burgundians
accepted a large indemnity and gave her into English hands. They could not take
her life for defeating them in war, but they could have her condemned as a
sorceress and a heretic. Had she not been able to inspire the French with the
Devil’s own courage? In an age when belief in witchcraft and demons was general,
the charge did not seem too preposterous. Already the English and Burgundian
soldiers had been attributing their reverses to her spells.
In a cell in the
castle of Rouen to which Joan was moved two days before Christmas, she was
chained to a plank bed, and watched over night and day. On February 21, 1431,
she appeared for the first time before a court of the Inquisition. It was
presided over by Pierre Cauchon, bishop of Beauvais, a ruthless, ambitious man
who apparently hoped through English influence to become archbishop of Rouen.
The other judges were lawyers and theologians who had been carefully selected by
Cauchon. In the course of six public and nine private sessions, covering a
period of ten weeks, the prisoner was cross-examined as to her visions and
voices, her assumption of male attire, her faith, and her willingness to submit
to the Church. Alone and undefended, the nineteen-year-old girl bore herself
fearlessly, her shrewd answers, honesty, piety, and accurate memory often
proving embarrassing to these severe inquisitors. Through her ignorance of
theological terms, on a few occasions she was betrayed into making damaging
statements. At the end of the hearings, a set of articles was drawn up by the
clerks and submitted to the judges, who thereupon pronounced her revelations the
work of the Devil and Joan herself a heretic. The theological faculty of the
University of Paris approved the court’s verdict.

In final deliberations
the tribunal voted to hand Joan over to the secular arm for burning if she still
refused to confess she had been a witch and had lied about hearing voices. This
she steadfastly refused to do, though physically exhausted and threatened with
torture. Only when she was led out into the churchyard of St. Ouen before a
great crowd, to hear the sentence committing her to the flames, did she kneel
down and admit she had testified falsely. She was then taken back to prison.
Under pressure from her jailers, she had some time earlier put off the male
attire, which her accusers seemed to find particularly objectionable. Now,
either by her own choice or as the result of a trick played upon her by those
who wanted her death, she resumed it. When Bishop Cauchon, with some witnesses,
visited her in her cell to question her further, she had recovered from her
weakness, and once more she claimed that God had truly sent her and that the
voices had come from Him. Cauchon was well pleased with this turn of
events.

On Tuesday, May 29, 1431, the judges, after hearing Cauchon’s
report, condemned Joan as a relapsed heretic and delivered her to the English.
The next morning at eight o’clock she was led out into the market place of Rouen
to be burned at the stake. As the faggots were lighted, a Dominican friar, at
her request, held up a cross before her eyes and, while the flames leapt higher
and higher, she was heard to call on the name of Jesus. John Tressart, one of
King Henry’s secretaries, viewed the scene with horror and was probably joined
in spirit by others when he exclaimed remorsefully, “We are lost! We have burned
a saint!” Joan’s ashes were cast into the Seine.

Twenty-five years later,
when the English had been driven out, the Pope at Avignon ordered a rehearing of
the case. By that time Joan was being hailed as the savior of France. Witnesses
were heard and depositions made, and in consequence the trial was pronounced
irregular. She was formally rehabilitated as a true and faithful daughter of the
Church. From a short time after her death up to the French Revolution, a local
festival in honor of the Maid was held at Orleans on May 8, commemorating the
day the siege was raised. The festival was reestablished by Napoleon I. In 1920
the French Republic declared May 8 a day of national celebration. Joan was
beatified in 1909 and canonized by Benedict XV in
1919.

Original article: 

CATHOLIC NEWS WORLD : WEDNESDAY MAY 30, 2012

Milan Meeting: Marriage matters

2012-05-31 Vatican Radio

Hundreds of thousands of people from over 140 countries are currently attending the World Meeting of Families in Milan to discuss issues affecting marriage and family life. Pope Benedict travels to Milan on Friday to meet with those attending the 5-day event and will remain in the northern Italian city until Sunday.

Among the participants at the meeting is Edmund Adamus, Director for Marriage and Family Life at the Diocese of Westminster in London. Susy Hodges spoke to him just before his departure for Milan. As a married man with a toddler son, Adamus speaks at first hand about some of the practical challenges of raising a family and about the threats facing the institution of the family in today’s secularised society.

Asked about the current state of the family, Adamaus concedes that it is a “bleak” landscape given “the enormous breakdown in family life” that has occurred in Britain over the past few decades. At the same time, he says surveys have shown there is “a real desire” among young people to achieve “a renaissance of family life.”

When it comes to his own family and the lessons he has learnt as a husband and father, Adamus says one of those lessons was realising the need to make “a clear distinction between work time and family time”, especially in view of the growing influence of information technology and its “invasion into family life.”

Listen to the full interview by Susy Hodges with Edmund Adamus:

See more here:

Milan Meeting: Marriage matters

Milan awaits the Pope

2012-05-31 L’Osservatore Romano

Families from five continents are meeting in Milan for the 7th World Meeting.
It will be these same families that will welcome Benedict XVI on Friday
afternoon, 1 June, upon his arrival in the capital of Lombardia. One can bet
that they will

welcome
him with the same enthusiasm with which they  flooded the streets, squares,
churches and meeting places in the Ambrosian metropolis.

The participating families – coming from 100 countries including Guinea
Bissau, one of the poorest countries, and even Australia from the other side of
the world – are not only enlivening the Pastoral Theological Congress’ work at
MiCo (Fieramilanocity) and in several places in the city and  various
neighbouring dioceses in Lombardia, but are actively participating in all
initiatives, such as the “Congress of children”, uniting the youngest
participants. At the first gathering, hundreds of children hand-in-hand recited,
each in their own language, the “Our Father” for their parents and the victims
of the earthquake which struck Emilia Romagna and part of Lombardia. It was an
act of solidarity in addition to the fund raising organized by Family 2012 and
Caritas Ambrosiana.

In short, as one of the largest posters hung in the city announces: “In
Milan, doors open to the world”. Because the family, despite its great changes
and challenges, remains the cornerstone of civil life and society. Cardinal
Angelo Scola, Archbishop of Milan, underlined that the World Meeting “desires to
offer itself as an event of the people, capable of entering into dialogue with
the fundamental needs of every person”. Along that same line, according to
Cardinal Ennio Antonelli, President of the Pontifical Council for the Family,
“the event in Milan, like every true and intense meeting of persons, is made up
of a rich, complex and interesting network of relationships”, which must be
recognized and welcomed “with gratuitousness, passion and intelligence”.

Continue reading: 

Milan awaits the Pope

‘Familiaris Consortio’, a road map: Part 2

2012-05-31 Vatican Radio

While the 7th ‘World Meeting of Families’ is currently taking place in Milan Veronica Scarisbrick continues to look at a document drawn up by Blessed John Paul II by the title of ‘Familiaris Consortio ‘ which focuses on the role of the Christian family in the modern world.

A document published on November 22, 1981 which this Polish Pontiff referred to during his Apostolic visit to Great Britain six months later.

Professor of Social teaching at the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas here in Rome, Dominican Alejandro Crosthwaite gets asked shines the spotlight on this specific passage. One part of a homily focusing on the Sacrament of Marriage delivered at York’s Knavesmere Racecourse on the 31 May 1982 during a Holy Mass dedicated in a special way to families:

Listen :

See the original post:  

‘Familiaris Consortio’, a road map: Part 2

‘Familiaris Consortio’, a road map: Part 2

2012-05-31 Vatican Radio

While the 7th ‘World Meeting of Families’ is currently taking place in Milan Veronica Scarisbrick continues to look at a document drawn up by Blessed John Paul II by the title of ‘Familiaris Consortio ‘ which focuses on the role of the Christian family in the modern world.

A document published on November 22, 1981 which this Polish Pontiff referred to during his Apostolic visit to Great Britain six months later.

Professor of Social teaching at the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas here in Rome, Dominican Alejandro Crosthwaite gets asked shines the spotlight on this specific passage. One part of a homily focusing on the Sacrament of Marriage delivered at York’s Knavesmere Racecourse on the 31 May 1982 during a Holy Mass dedicated in a special way to families:

Listen :

View original: 

‘Familiaris Consortio’, a road map: Part 2

The Visitation: "With God nothing is impossible"…

2012-05-31 Vatican Radio

Monsignor Philip Whitmore brings us a musical meditation on the second Joyful Mysteryof the Rosary , the Visitation with settings of the Magnificat by Monteverdi and Bach:

” On hearing the news the Angel brought her, Mary went as quickly as she could to visit her cousin Elizabeth. Not only was the young virgin to give birth to a child, but so was her older cousin , who had been barren for years. With God nothing is impossible. When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, straight away she cried out: ‘Of all women , you are the most blessed and blessed is the fruit of your womb.’

In reply, Mary poured out her feelings of joy and exultation in that glorious canticle the Magnificat, which the Church uses in the office of Evening Prayer every day.”

A programme produced by Veronica Scarisbrick .

Listen :

Continued here - 

The Visitation: "With God nothing is impossible"…

The Pope, the press and the facts

2012-05-31 Vatican Radio

The case of the personal documents stolen from Pope Benedict XVI and published by Italian press continues to attract the interest of international media, to the point that in an impromptu speech at the end of his weekly appointment with the faithful from around the world, the Pope himself addressed it directly. Emer McCarthy reports

Listen:

“The events of recent days”, he said, “have brought sadness to my heart, but never obscured my firm conviction that despite trials, difficulties and weaknesses, the Lord does not abandon his Church.” “Nevertheless,” continued the Pope “some entirely gratuitous allegations have spread, amplified by some media, which went well beyond the facts, offering a picture of the Holy See that does not correspond to reality.” Pope Benedict concluded, saying, “I would like therefore to reiterate my confidence and my encouragement to my staff and to all those who, day in and day out, faithfully and with a spirit of sacrifice, quietly help me in fulfilling my ministry.”

One of those collaborators, Holy See Press Office Director, Fr. Federico Lombardi S.J., met with press for a third straight day Wednesday in a briefing that consisted largely in deflating many of those rumours of which the Pope had spoken in his audience.

He reiterated that they only person arrested and formally charged for the theft of the Pope’s personal documents remains Paolo Gabriele and there are no others, lay or clergy, currently detained – as reported by some press. That Gabriele met again Wednesday morning with his lawyers who have formulated a request for his release under house arrest. That his formal interrogation would take place in the coming days.

Fr Lombardi again underlined that the official investigation into the criminal act of theft is being carried out by the Vatican Gendarme (police force) and magistrates. That the Commission of Cardinals’ inquiry into the source of leaked Vatican documents was a separate if parallel effort to arrive at the truth.

Fr. Lombardi again corrected press claims that documents ready to be sent to specific recipients were found in Gabriele’s home, but – he added – the material found in the Butler’s possession is still being studied and cataloged.

Fr. Lombardi again stressed the importance of truth and objectivity in reporting on this case which is not only a source of pain for the Pope but for the faithful worldwide.

“I think that our will to reach the truth, the desire for clarity, for transparency – arrived at gradually over time – this is how we are trying to handle this new situation: in all honesty we are trying to understand what objectively happened. But first, whatever we do, we must remember respect for the privacy and protection of the person and for the truth”.

In an interview with L’Osservatore Romano, another of the Pope’s closest collaborators, Archbishop Angelo Becciu, the Substitute of the Secretariat of State, stated that the Holy Father was not merely “robbed of letters”, but the act of stealing and publishing those letters was an act of “violence on the consciences of those who turn to him as Vicar of Christ in full confidence”.

He also dismissed the principal “that the end justifies the means”. This has been claimed by the anonymous sources who provided the leaked documents to the press and the journalists who published them, in the name of greater transparency and reform in the Church. How can any reform, he asked, be based on flouting moral laws? Stealing is immoral.

Archbishop Becciu reiterated that the Church firmly believes that “the truth will set you free”, but that the distorted image of the Vatican as presented in the press based on unfounded rumours and unproven speculation is far from the truth. He spoke of “an underlying hypocrisy” in press reporting: “On the one hand the central government of the Church is accused of being absolutist and monarchical” while on the other many of the personal documents published by Italian press reveal contrasting ideas and even complaints about the governance of the Church. Thus proving, in Archbishop Becciu’s view, that “we are not mummies; rather, different viewpoints or even contrasting evaluations are normal”.

Responding to journalists questions on reports of the Pope’s possible resignation Fr. Lombardi dismissed the rumours as some journalists’ “hobbyhorse”. The Curia he concluded – “continues to express solidarity with the Pope and to operate in full communion with the Successor of Peter. At this time and in this situation we can only express our great appreciation for the Holy Father, for his ministry, his demonstration of unity, coherence and consistency in dealing with this situation.”

But perhaps it was best put by Benedict XVI, who in his Wednesday audience observed: “Faced with conflict in human relationships, even within the family, often we fail to persevere in gratuitous love, which demands effort and sacrifice. Instead, God does not tire of us, He never grows tired of being patient with us and with his immense mercy He is always before us, He always comes to encounter us. ”

This article: 

The Pope, the press and the facts

Road Trippin’

I received a gentle reminder that it’s been a month and half since my
last post. (Has it really? Indeed, it has!)



it was minus five degrees (celsius) on the north shore of Lake Superior, plus wind chill

We hit the road on April 28 to attend my little brother’s wedding in British Columbia.

Four kids, a
tent, a sizeable cooler, and lots of audio books. It was awesome. A bit chilly, but awesome.

No hotels or restaurants for us. We’re much too

poor

cool for that!



Rafe getting his crawl-time on a crawl break

I made three or four loaves of sourdough, a gallon of home-made yogurt,
and a gallon of granola. We bought our beloved smoked kolbassa and a
bushel of apples at the farmer’s market on the way out.

We couldn’t seem to get enough of rocks!





or water….



Paddington Bear and some truly awesome 1970′s melmac. Why did they stop making it?


Will and I are in awe of this country. The size of it. The glory and majesty and variety. From cacti in the badlands to snow peaks in the Rockies to the endless skies of Saskatchewan to the barren, thundering shores of Lake Superior. We just couldn’t top marveling.

And as if that weren’t enough, we were not eaten by grizzly bears, and our car did not break down. And we kept our hands clean of fast food (with the exception of twice), so that was a relief.

Best of all, seeing my littlest brother, my baby brother, so happy….what I saw, that is, through rivers of hormonal tears—I don’t do well at weddings, nor do any of the females in my family, we’re a sappy lot—was worth the whole trip.

Dancing is a good outlet. They should have dancing at funerals too. I’m going to request a DJ and a strobe light and beer and a disco ball for my funeral.

But back to weddings. There were many happy meetings at this wedding: the surprise arrival of my brother from Sweden, meeting my new sister-in-law’s sweet home-schooling family on their ranch in the Caribou, seeing old friends, and perhaps best of all, meeting all my young cousins grown-up into such fine, beautiful men and women. Happy meetings.

I’m a bit shy about sharing family photos here. You’ll understand. (And in the end, most of my pictures were of rocks.) But I’ll probably share a few more moments from the trip, as I sift and sort through pictures and stories.

Link:  

Road Trippin’

How about moving the "Sign of Peace" to the Narthex?

Cardinal Arinze: Pope considering moving sign of peace


Cardinal Francis Arinze

Vatican City, Nov 24, 2008 / 12:33 pm (CNA).- The prefect for the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments, Cardinal Francis Arinze, has said that Pope Benedict XVI may consider moving the sign of peace to before the offertory, “in order to create a moment of reflection while we prepare for communion.”

In an interview with the L’Osservatore Romano on the 50th anniversary of his ordination to the priesthood, Cardinal Arinze explained that “a different placement of the sign of peace” is under consideration. “Often the full significance of this gesture is not understood. It is seen as an occasion to shake the hands of our friends, when in reality it is a way of saying to the one next to us that the peace of Christ, truly present on the altar, is also for all mankind.”

“In order to create a more meditative atmosphere as we prepare for Communion, moving the sign of peace to the offertory is being considered. The Pope has consulted the bishops, and later he will decide,” Arinze explained.

Cardinal Arinze later explained that his dicastery “is not a sort of ‘ecclesiastical’ police or ‘intervener’ for every problem. The dicastery was created first of all to promote divine worship,” although “we certainly cannot close our eyes to objectively problematic situations,” he added.

“The 2004 document Redemptoris Sacramentum points out that many of the liturgical abuses “are not due to ill will but rather ignorance. Some just don’t know, but they also don’t know they are ignoring something. They don’t know, for example, that words and gestures have roots in the tradition of the Church. Thus they think they are being more original and creative by changing these texts and gestures. In response to this situation, it is necessary to reaffirm that the liturgy is sacred and is the public prayer of the Church.”

Read the article:

How about moving the "Sign of Peace" to the Narthex?

Mock turtle


Then the Queen left off, quite out of breath, and said to Alice, “Have you seen the Mock Turtle yet?”
“No,” said Alice. “I don’t even know what a Mock Turtle is.”
“It’s the thing Mock Turtle Soup is made from,” said the Queen.


Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, will you join the dance?

Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, won’t you join the dance?



NB: This is not a Mock Turtle:


Taken from - 

Mock turtle

The Ordination of Two Transitional Deacons

Vietnamese Martyrs Catholic Church in Arlington

On May 22, 2012, a crowd of around 1200 people gathered from all over the Diocese and beyond for the ordination of two of our transitional deacons: Khoi Tran and James Wilcox. This will be the first of five transitional diaconate ordinations in the coming twelve months for us. The Liturgy was celebrated in Vietnamese, English, Spanish, and Latin. It was a wonderful gathering of our local Church that not only expressed the prayers, appreciation, and support for “Vocations” to those in priestly formation, but it was also reflected the ethnic diversity of our local Church, and therefore the Universal Church! What follows are some pictures and the ordination homily.



Photo by Juan Guajardo



Photo by Juan Guajardo

Ordination of Deacon James Wilcox and Deacon Khoi Tran
Vietnamese Martyrs Catholic Church
Arlington, Texas

Dear Khoi and James, and all gathered here today,

As we gather in this joyful occasion at the ordination to the Diaconate of our brothers here, we are also gathered between the Ascension and Pentecost. This is the time when the apostles went back to Jerusalem to wait for the Holy Spirit, and from there they were sent to preach the Gospel to all the world and build up the Church. In this time of waiting, they were not quite sure what lay ahead, other than the admonishment of the angels to go, and even in their uncertainty about the future they trusted in the one who loved them. And in today’s Gospel He tells them that “they belonged to Him, and that He prayed for them” — the One who said that He would send them a helper. Indeed, He did, and He sent them the Holy Spirit. It is the same Holy Spirit who sends Saint Paul forth to a world that did not know Jesus, and whose chronicles we hear in these days. The same St. Paul, in the midst of his trails in Ephesus, says that he only wants to “finish his course” which is the ministry that he received from the Lord Jesus, to “bear witness to the Gospel of God’s grace.” If we believe that the living word of God is not just words on a page, then these are the living word of God for all of us today, but especially for you, James and Khoi.

In these days, as you finished this academic year in your seminaries, you have been, as it were, between the Ascension and Pentecost. You know you are being sent to a future proclaiming the word and charity that is yet to be revealed. It is as if the same angels of the Ascension are saying to you “why are you waiting: go, now, and live what you have learned, the Holy Spirit will be with you.”

We here all come from various parts of the United States and the World, such as Vietnam and Mexico. Khoi…the faith nurtured by your family in Vietnam, and your life as a religious, accompany you to this day. James…your journey of faith in the Diocese of Dallas, the business world and in Carrollton, all came together here today as well. They are all directed by the Providential Hand of the Lord to this very moment. You have born witness, not to the Jews and Gentiles of Saint Paul’s world, but to all of the people who have formed your lives. And know as St. Paul says [you are] “compelled by the Spirit” not to Jerusalem but to Arlington, Fort Worth and beyond!

Khoi, in your reflection, you wondered why the Lord chose you. You now know the answer. The Lord Himself says it when he says today that “you belong to Him.” Believe now indeed that He sends you forth. James, as you reflect on the high priestly prayer of Jesus for today, you speak in much the same way as Khoi: This ministry of the Diaconate is about being a servant for those whom the Lord gives you, and to give glory to God by your ministry of word and charity.

Between the Saints of this parish Church and the saint of the day, Saint Rita, we are surrounded by people who will intercede for you and help you from this day forward. The Martyrs of Vietnam remind you, as well as all of us, of the necessity of a courageous witness of faith with one’s life at all costs – a significant reminder for our world and culture today. Saint Rita, known as a Saint of the Impossible, always kept her eyes on Christ in some difficult situations, and she teaches us from eternity, that with the Lord, there are no “impossible situations” only countless occasions where we all find strength and grace in the midst of weakness; the gift of “Wonder and Awe” that our confirmation candidates have learned, and we need to learn again and again. Your ordinations, James and Khoi, are an occasion for you, and all of us, to experience that again and again.

As Deacons now, you are being sent to be icons of Charity and the Word, that in these moments of ministry, and in all of your lives: “BELIEVE WHAT YOU READ, TEACH WHAT YOU BELIEVE AND PRACTICE WHAT YOU TEACH.”

View this article:  

The Ordination of Two Transitional Deacons

An Ember Day reminder

Read more - 

An Ember Day reminder