• Home
  • Mass Times
  • Daily Saint
  • Daily Mass
  • Mass Readings
  • The Hours
Catholic Canada
chalice07 - fathersday.jpg
banner-priestsforlife2
  • About
  • CC MASS TIMES
  • CC BISHOPS
    • ARCHBISHOPS
      • Sing and Walk – Abp Paul Andre Durocher
      • The Journey of a Bishop – Abp Terrence Prendergast
      • The Reason for Our Hope – Abp Richard Smith
    • BISHOPS
      • Waiting in Joyful Hope – Bp Thomas Dowd
      • Diocese of Whitehorse – Bp Gary Gordon
      • Other Bishops
      • Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB)
      • Évêques
  • CC PRIESTS
    • DEACONS
      • Deacon Mike
    • PRIESTS
      • Fr Anthony Ho
      • In Formation – Fr John Redmond
      • Fr Raymond de Sousa
      • Jesuits
      • Other Priests
      • Franciscans
  • CC LAITY
    • CC MEN
      • Confessions of a Thirty Something Cybertronian – Marco
      • Everyday for Life Canada – Lou Iacobelli
      • Lilley’s Pad – Brian Lilley
      • Jonah in the Heart of Nineveh – John Laws
      • Michael Coren’s Blog
      • Other Men
      • Rorate Coeli
      • Socon or Bust – John Pacheco
      • Heresy Hunter
      • The Theology of Dad – Dr. Colin Kerr
      • Vox Cantoris – David Anthony Domet
    • CC WOMEN
      • Dumb Old Housewives
      • Foolishness to the world – Deborah Gyapong
      • Other Women
    • CC YOUTH
      • Catholic Schools
      • Kathleen Dunn
      • Vocations
      • WYD – Rio 2013
    • Home Schoolers
    • Family Life
  • CC DIOCESES
    • Anglican Ordinariate
    • ARCHDIOCESES
      • Edmonton
      • Gatineau
      • Montreal
      • Toronto
      • Vancouver
    • DIOCESES
      • Hamilton
      • Prince Albert
      • Other Dioceses
    • Eastern Rites
  • UK
    • PRIESTS – UK
      • A Chaplain Abroad – Fr Bede Rowe – Fr Bede Rowe
      • Fr Ray Blake’s Blog
      • Fr Sean Finnegan
      • The hermeneutic of continuity – Fr Timothy Finigan
    • LAITY – UK
      • Holy Smoke – Damian Thompson
      • Mulier Fortis – MacLernon
  • USA
    • PRIESTS – USA
      • Cardinal Timothy Dolan
      • Courageous Priest
      • Father Z’s Blog – WDTPRS (Fr Zed)
      • iPadre Catholic Podcasting – Fr Jay Finelli
      • Other Priests-US
      • Standing on my Head – Fr Dwight Longenecker
      • These Stone Walls – Fr Gordon McCrae
      • Word on Fire – Fr Robert Barron
    • MEN – USA
      • RealCatholicTV – Michael Voris
      • Whispers in the Loggia – Rocco Palmo
  • WOMEN – USA

Daily Archives: May 17, 2012

Socialist political parties seek removal of Spanish bishop for ‘homophobia’

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Three socialist parties in the government, have passed a resolution demanding the exclusion of the local bishop from all local government functions for preaching always held Catholic Church doctrines on homosexual behavior.

May 17, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A trio of socialist political parties in the government of Alcalá de Henares, Spain, has passed a resolution demanding the exclusion of the local bishop from all local government functions for preaching the Catholic Church’s doctrines on homosexual behavior, which it characterizes as “homophobic.”

The resolution also asks that the Spanish Episcopal Conference remove the bishop from his position as head of the diocese.

Bishop Juan Antonio Reig Plà incurred the ire of socialists and homosexual groups in Spain when he gave a sermon on Good Friday in early April that included homosexual behavior in a list of destructive vices.

With regard to homosexual behavior, Reig Plà said: “One must not corrupt people, not even with false messages. I would like to say a word to those people carried away by so many ideologies that end up failing to properly guide human sexuality. They think that since their childhood they have had an attraction to people of their same sex and, sometimes, to prove it they become corrupt and prostitute themselves or go to homosexual nightclubs. I assure you that (there) they find hell.”

After expressions of outrage regarding the bishop’s statement, which reflects the perennial teaching of the Catholic Church and all traditional Christianity on sexual deviance, Reig Plà gave an interview to the Internet news service Religion en Libertad (Religion in Liberty). In the interview he explained his statement in more detail, and added that homosexual tendencies can be cured through therapy, further angering opponents of Catholic teaching on sexual morality.

Reig Plà‘s opponents have responded by filing at least one criminal complaint at the national level, and a local judge has ordered an investigation into the bishop’s statements, requesting a copy of the video from the television network that broadcast it. Reig Plà has countered by posting testimonies by homosexuals and former homosexuals supporting his stance.

Now the Spanish Socialist Worker’s Party (PSOE), with the United Left (IU) and the Union, Progress, and Democracy Party (UPyD), claim that the bishop’s words “have put Alcalá on the homophobic map,” in the words of one PSOE representative, and want Reig Plá removed from his position. However, the mayor of Alcalá de Henares, Bartolomé González, who is a member of the more conservative People’s Party, has been silent on the matter, according to the El Plural newspaper.

The same publication reports that a People’s Party spokesman has called the motion by the other parties “the new inquisition to which the socialist group has appointed itself,” and characterized the spokesman for the POSE “the new Torquemada.”

The Diocese of Alcalá de Henares has responded with a public statement noting that Bishop Reig Plà‘s affirmations are simply a repetition of Catholic teaching, and that he has no intention of retracting them.

While expressing “respect for all people,” the diocese adds that “it is not legitimate for any human institution to judge, and much less, impede the teaching of the contents of Catholic Doctrine,” calling it a “sad and intolerable violation of human rights and the principle of Church-State separation.”

“Our father and pastor, the Bishop of Alcalá de Henaraes, Mons. Juan Antonio Reig Plà , has always taught, with charity and truth, Catholic doctrine, and he will continue to do so, by the grace of God,” the statement continues, and concludes: “We invite all Catholics to pray for religious liberty and other human rights in Spain, for our pastor Mons. Juan Antonio Reig, and for all those who—without judging their intention—are persecuting him for defending justice.”

Bishop Reig Plà has received support from many Catholic organizations, including the International Federation of Catholic Medical Associations (FIAMC), pro-life and pro-family groups such as Spain’s influential Hazte Oir (Make Yourself Heard), and the Catholic blogosphere.

A special Internet website has been established by Bishop Reig Plá supporters to facilitate many communications of support to the bishop:

The website, requests entry of “Nombre” :first name, “Apellidos”: last name, “Provincia”: EEUU for United States, Irlandia for Ireland, Reino Unido for United Kingdom (Canada and Australia are spelled virtually the same way). Instructions are to type comments in the “Mensaje personal” box, and click on “Firmar” to send the signed message to Bishop Reig Plá.

The letter states: Monseñor Reig Plà: I wish to express to you my support and to thank you for the brilliant homily that you gave last Good Friday. The lies and insults cannot erase the truth that enclose words such as yours, which help me to understand the sense of the Passion of the Lord, and the real meaning of sin.

Previous LifeSiteNews coverage:

* Spanish bishop publishes ex-gay testimonies on diocesan website after attacks from homosexual groups
* Liberal outrage in Spain: Homosexual groups seek prosecution of bishop over sermon on homosexuality

Link: 

Socialist political parties seek removal of Spanish bishop for ‘homophobia’

Read More

Time

Thursday, May 17, 2012

O, Time, Time!

With what unbending rhyme

Thy steps do ever ring!

Joy’s moments fleet–

Brides’ hearts’ swift beat–

Ever-vanishing spring:

No moment there remains.

Hopes and bitterest pains

Fade ever as they meet

Time’s swift inexorable feet.

O, Time, Time!
With what doom-laden mime
Dost dance unhurried by!
Tears fall like leaves;
Each moment grieves
To see her sister die.
None can wring tears from thee.
Loss and autumnal victory
Fade to shadows, sped
By Time’s inexorable tread.

O, Time, Time!
Love, hatred, vilest crime
All like beneath thy gaze!
Sorrows mean naught to thee;
Pain cannot hastened be
Nor shortened life’s days.
Joys come now for some,
Doom for others; let them come:
Each must in turn pass by
Time’s blind undiscerning eye.

Excerpt from - 

Time

Read More

CATHOLIC NEWS WORLD : WED. MAY 16, 2012

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Information:

Feast Day: May 16
Born: 1247, Tuscany, Italy
Died: February 22, 1297, Cortona, Italy
Canonized: May 16, 1728 by Pope Benedict XIII
Patron of: gainst temptations; falsely accused people; hoboes; homeless
people; insanity; loss of parents; mental illness; mentally ill people;
midwives; penitent women; people ridiculed for their piety; reformed
prostitutes; sexual temptation; single laywomen; third children;
tramps
They were stirring times in
Tuscany when Margaret was born. They were the days of Manfred and Conradin, of
the Guelphs and Ghibellines in Italy, when passions of every kind ran high, and
men lived at great extremes. They were times of great sinners, but also of great
saints; Margaret lived to hear of the crowning and resignation of St. Celestine
V, whose life and death are a vivid commentary on the spirits that raged
throughout that generation. It was the age of St. Thomas in Paris, of Dante in
Florence; of Cimabue and Giotto; of the great cathedrals and universities. In
Tuscany itself, apart from the coming and going of soldiers, now of the Emperor,
now of the Pope, keeping the countryside in a constant state of turmoil, and
teaching the country-folk their ways, there were for ever rising little wars
among the little cities themselves, which were exciting and disturbing enough.
For instance, when Margaret was a child, the diocese in which she lived, Chiusi,
owned a precious relic, the ring of the Blessed Virgin Mary. An Augustinian
friar got possession of this relic, and carried it off to Perugia. This caused a
war, Chiusi and Perugia fought for the treasure and Perugia won. Such was the
spirit of her time, and of the people among whom she was brought up.

It
was also a time of the great revival; when the new religious orders had begun to
make their mark, and the old ones had renewed their strength. Franciscans and
Dominicians had reached down to the people, and every town and village in the
country had responded to their call to better things. St. Francis of Assisi had
received the stigmata on Mount Alverno twenty years before, quite close to where
Margaret was born; St. Clare died not far away, when Margaret was four years
old. And there was the opposite extreme, the enthusiasts whose devotion
degenerated into heresy. When Margaret was ten there arose in her own district
the Flagellants, whose processions of men, women, and children, stripped to the
waist and scourging themselves to blood, must have been a not uncommon sight to
her and her young companions.
Margaret was born in Laviano, a little town in
the diocese of Chiusi. Her parents were working people of the place; their child
was very beautiful, and in their devotion, for she was the only one, they could
scarcely help but spoil her. Thus from the first Margaret, as we would say, had
much against her; she grew up very willful and, like most spoilt children, very
restless and dissatisfied. Very soon her father’s cottage was too small for her;
she needed companions; she found more life and excitement in the streets of the
town Next, in course of time the little town itself grew too small; there was a
big world beyond about which she came to know, and Margaret longed to have a
part in it. Moreover she soon learnt that she could have a part in it if she
chose. For men took notice of her, not only men of her own station and
surroundings, whom she could bend to her will as she pleased; but great and
wealthy men from outside, who would sometimes ride through the village, and
notice her, and twit her for her beautiful face. They would come again; they
were glad to make her acquaintance, and sought to win her favor. Margaret
quickly learned that she had only to command, and there were many ready to
obey.

While she was yet very young her mother died; an event which seemed
to deprive her of the only influence that had hitherto held her in check.
Margaret records that she was taught by her mother a prayer she never forgot: “O
Lord Jesus, I beseech thee, grant salvation to all those for whom thou wouldst
have me pray.” To make matters worse her father married again. He was a man of
moods, at one time weak and indulgent, at another violent to excess, and yet
with much in him that was lovable, as we shall have reason to see. But with the
step-mother there was open and continued conflict. She was shocked at Margaret’s
willfulness and independence, and from her first coming to the house was
determined to deal with them severely. Such treatment was fatal to Margaret. As
a modern student has written of her: “Margaret’s surroundings were such as to
force to the surface the weaknesses of her character. As is clear from her own
confessions, she was by nature one of those women who thirst for affection, in
whom to be loved is the imperative need of their lives. She needed to be loved
that her soul might be free, and in her home she found not what she wanted. Had
she been of the weaker sort, either morally or physically, she would have
accepted her lot, vegetated in spiritual barrenness, married eventually a
husband of her father’s choice, and lived an uneventful life with a measure of
peace.”

As it was she became only the more willful and reckless. If there
was not happiness for her, either at home or elsewhere, there was pleasure and,
with a little yielding on her part, as much of it as she would. In no long time
her reputation in the town was one not to be envied; before she was seventeen
years of age she had given herself up to a life of indulgence, let the
consequences be what they might.

Living such a life it soon became
evident that Margaret could not stay in Laviano. The circumstances which took
her away are not very clear; we choose those which seem the most satisfactory. A
certain nobleman, living out beyond Montepulciano, which in those days was far
away, was in need of a servant in his castle. Margaret got the situation, there
at least she was free from her step-mother and, within limits, could live as she
pleased. But her master was young, and a sporting man, and no better than others
of his kind. He could not fail to take notice of the handsome girl who went
about his mansion, holding her head high as if she scorned the opinions of men,
with an air of independence that seemed to belong to one above her station. He
paid her attention; he made her nice presents, he would do her kindnesses even
while she served him. And on her side, Margaret was skilled in her art; she was
quick to discover that her master was as susceptible to her influence as were
the other less distinguished men with whom she had done as she would in Laviano.
Moreover this time she was herself attracted; she knew that this man loved her,
and she returned it in her way. There were no other competitors in the field to
distract her; there was no mother to warn her, no step-mother to abuse her. Soon
Margaret found herself installed in the castle, not as her master’s wife, for
convention would never allow that, but as his mistress, which was more easily
condoned. Some day, he had promised her, they would be married, but the day
never came. A child was born, and with that Margaret settled down to the
situation.

For some years she accepted her lot, though every day what she
had done grew upon her more and more. Apart from the evil life she was living,
her liberty loving nature soon found that instead of freedom she had secured
only slavery. The restless early days in Laviano seemed, in her present
perspective, less unhappy than she had thought; the poverty and restraint of her
father’s cottage seemed preferable to the wealth and chains of gold she now
endured. In her lonely hours, and they were many, the memory of her mother came
up before her, and she could not look her shadow in the face. And with that
revived the consciousness of sin, which of late she had defied, and had crushed
down by sheer reckless living, but which now loomed up before her like a
haunting ghost. She saw it all she hated it all, she hated herself because of
it, but there was no escape. It was all misery, but she must endure it; she had
made her own bed, and must henceforth lie upon it. In her solitary moments she
would wander into the gloom of the forest, and there would dream of the life
that might have been, a life of virtue and of the love of God. At her castle
gate she would be bountiful; if she could not be happy herself, at least she
could do something to help others. But for the rest she was defiant. She went
about her castle with the airs of an unbeaten queen. None should know, not even
the man who owned her, the agony that gnawed at her heart. From time to time
there would come across her path those who had pity for her. They would try to
speak to her, they would warn her of the risk she was running; but Margaret,
with her every ready wit, would laugh at their warnings and tell them that some
day she would be a saint.

So things went on for nine years, till Margaret
was twenty-seven. On a sudden there came an awakening. It chanced that her lord
had to go away on a distant journey; in a few days, when the time arrived for
his return, he did not appear. Instead there turned up at the castle gate his
favorite hound, which he had taken with him. As soon as it had been given
admittance it ran straight to Margaret’s room, and there began to whine about
her, and to tug at her dress as if it would drag her out of the room. Margaret
saw that something was amiss.

Anxious, not daring to express to herself
her own suspicions, she rose and followed the hound wherever it might lead; it
drew her away down to a forest a little distance from the castle walls. At a
point where a heap of faggots had been piled, apparently by wood-cutters, the
hound stood still, whining more than ever, and poking beneath the faggots with
its nose. Margaret, all trembling, set to work to pull the heaps away; in a hole
beneath lay the corpse of her lord, evidently some days dead, for the maggots
and worms had already begun their work upon it.

How he had come to his
death was never known; after all, in those days of high passions, and family
feuds, such murders were not uncommon. The careful way the body had been buried
suggested foul play; that was all. But for Margaret the sight she saw was of
something more than death. The old faith within her still lived, as we have
already seen, and now insisted on asking questions. The body of the man she had
loved and served was lying there before her, but what had become of his soul? If
it had been condemned, and was now in hell, who was, in great part at least,
responsible for its condemnation? Others might have murdered his body, but she
had done infinitely worse Moreover there was herself to consider. She had known
how, in the days past, she had stirred the rivalry and mutual hatred of men on
her account and had gloried in it who knew but that this deed had been done by
some rival because of her? Or again, her body might have been Lying there where
his now lay, her fatal beauty being eaten by worms, and in that case where would
her soul then have been? Of that she could have no sort of doubt. Her whole life
came up before her, crying out now against her as she had never before permitted
it to cry. Margaret rushed from the spot, beside herself in this double misery,
back to her room, turned in an instant to a torture-chamber.
What should she
do next? She was not long undecided. Though the castle might still be her home,
she would not stay in it a moment longer. But where could she go? There was only
one place of refuge that she knew, only one person in the world who was likely
to have pity on her. Though her father’s house had been disgraced in the eyes of
all the village by what she had done, though the old man all these years had
been bent beneath the shame she had brought upon him, still there was the memory
of past kindness and love which he had always shown her. It was true sometimes
he had been angry, especially when others had roused him against her and her
ways; but always in the end, when she had gone to him, he had forgiven her and
taken her back. She would arise and go to her father, and would ask him to
forgive her once more; this time in her heart she knew she was in earnest–even
if he failed her she would not turn back. Clothed as she was, holding her child
in her arms, taking no heed of the spectacle she made, she left the castle,
tramped over the ridge and down the valley to Laviano, came to her father’s
cottage, found him within alone and fell at his feet, confessing her guilt,
imploring him with tears to give her shelter once again.
The old man easily
recognized his daughter. The years of absence, the fine clothes she wore, the
length of years which in some ways had only deepened the striking lines of her
handsome face, could not take from his heart the picture of the child of whom
once he had been so proud. To forgive was easy; it was easy to find reasons in
abundance. Had he not indulged her in the early days, perhaps she would never
have fallen. Had he made home a more satisfying place for a child of so yearning
a nature, perhaps she would never have gone away. Had he been a more careful
guardian, had he protected her from those who had lured her into evil ways long
ago, she would never have wandered so far, she would never have brought this
shame upon him and upon herself. She was repentant, she wished to make amends,
she had proved it by this renunciation, she showed she loved and trusted him; he
must give her a chance to recover. If he did not give it to her, who
would?

So the old man argued with himself, and for a time his counsel
prevailed. Margaret with her child was taken back; if she would live quietly at
home the past might be lived down. But such was not according to Margaret’s
nature. She did not wish the past to be forgotten, it must be atoned. She had
done great evil, she had given great scandal; she must prove to God and man that
she had broken with the past, and that she meant to make amends. The spirit of
fighting sin by public penance was in the air; the Dominican and Franciscan
missionaries preached it, there were some in her neighborhood who were carrying
it to a dangerous extreme. Margaret would let all the neighbors see that she did
not shirk the shame that was her due. Every time she appeared in the church it
was with a rope of penance round her waist; she would kneel at the church door
that all might pass her by and despise her; since this did not win for her the
scorn she desired, one day, when the people were gathered for mass, she stood up
before the whole congregation and made public confession of the wickedness of
her life.

But this did not please her old father. He had hoped she would
lie quiet and let the scandal die; instead she kept the memory of it always
alive. He had expected that soon all would be forgotten; instead she made of
herself a public show. In a very short time his mind towards her changed.
Indulgence turned to resentment, resentment to bitterness, bitterness to
something like hatred. Besides, there was another in the house to be reckoned
with; the step-mother, who from her first coming there had never been a friend
of Margaret. She had endured her return because, for the moment, the old man
would not be contradicted, but she had bided her time. Now when he wavered she
brought her guns to bear; to the old man in secret, to Margaret before her face,
she did not hesitate to use every argument she knew. This hussy who had shamed
them all in the sight of the whole village had dared to cross her spotless
threshold, and that with a baggage of a child in her arms. How often when she
was a girl had she been warned where her reckless life would lead her! When she
had gone away, in spite of every appeal, she had been told clearly enough what
would be her end. All these years she had continued, never once relenting, never
giving them a sign of recognition, knowing very well the disgrace she had
brought upon them, while she enjoyed herself in luxury and ease. Let her look to
it; let her take the consequences. That house had been shamed enough; it should
not be shamed any more, by keeping such a creature under its roof. One day when
things had reached a climax, without a word of pity Margaret and her child were
driven out of the door. If she wished to do penance, let her go and join the
fanatical Flagellants, who were making such a show of themselves not far
away.

Margaret stood in the street, homeless, condemned by her own, an
outcast. Those in the town looked on and did nothing; she was not one of the
kind to whom it was either wise or safe to show pity, much less to take her into
their own homes. And Margaret knew it; since her own father had rejected her she
could appeal to no one else; she could only hide her head in shame, and find
refuge in loneliness in the open lane. But what should she do next? For she had
not only herself to care for; there was also the child in her arms. As she sat
beneath a tree looking away from Laviano, her eyes wandered up the ridge on
which stood Montepulciano. Over that ridge was the bright, gay world she had
left, the world without a care, where she had been able to trample scandal
underfoot and to live as a queen. There she had friends who loved her; rich
friends who had condoned her situation, poor friends who had been beholden to
her for the alms she had given them. Up in the castle there were still wealth
and luxury waiting for her, and even peace of a kind, if only she would go back
to them. Besides, from the castle what good she could do! She was now free; she
could repent in silence and apart; with the wealth at her disposal she could
help the poor yet more. Since she had determined to change her life, could she
not best accomplish it up there, far away from the sight of men?

On the
other hand, what was she doing here? She had tried to repent, and all her
efforts had only come to this; she was a homeless outcast on the road, with all
the world to glare at her as it passed her by. Among her own people, even if in
the end she were forgiven and taken back, she could never be the same again.
Then came a further thought. She knew herself well by this time. Did she wish
that things should be the same again? In Laviano, among the old surroundings
which she had long outgrown, among peasants and laborers whom she had long left
behind, was it not likely that the old boredom would return, more burdensome now
that she had known the delights of freedom? Would not the old temptations
return, had they not returned already, had they not been with her all the time,
and with all her good intentions was it not certain that she would never be able
to resist? Then would her last state be worse than her first. How much better to
be prudent, to take the opportunity as it was offered, perhaps to use for good
the means and the gifts she had hitherto used only for evil? Thus, resting under
a tree in her misery, a great longing came over Margaret, to have done with the
penitence which had all gone wrong, to go back to the old life where all had
gone well, and would henceforth go better, to solve her problems once and for
all by the only way that seemed open to her. That lonely hour beneath the tree
was the critical hour of her life.
Happily for her, and for many who have
come after her, Margaret survived it: “I have put thee as a burning light,” Our
Lord said to her later, “to enlighten those who sit in the darkness.–I have set
thee as an example to sinners, that in thee they may behold how my mercy awaits
the sinner who is willing to repent; for as I have been merciful to thee, so
will I be merciful to them.” She had made up her mind long ago, and she would
not go back now. She shook herself and rose to go; but where? The road down
which she went led to Cortona; a voice within her seemed to tell her to go
thither. She remembered that at Cortona was a monastery of Franciscans. It was
famous all over the countryside; Brother Elias had built it, and had lived and
died there; the friars, she knew, were everywhere described as the friends of
sinners. She might go to them; perhaps they would have pity on her and find her
shelter. But she was not sure. They would know her only too well, for she had
long been the talk of the district, even as far as Cortona; was it not too much
to expect that the Franciscan friars would so easily believe in so sudden and
complete a conversion? Still she could only try; at the worst she could but
again be turned into the street, and that would be more endurable from them than
the treatment she had just received in Laviano.

Her fears were mistaken.
Margaret knocked at the door of the monastery, and the friars did not turn her
away. They took pity on her; they accepted her tale though, as was but to be
expected, with caution. She made a general confession, with such a flood of
tears that those who witnessed it were moved. It was decided that Margaret was,
so far at least, sincere and harmless, and they found her a home. They put her
in charge of two good matrons of the town, who spent their slender means in
helping hard cases and who undertook to provide for her. Under their roof she
began in earnest her life of penance. Margaret could not do things by halves;
when she had chosen to sin she had defied the world in her sinning, now that she
willed to do penance she was equally defiant of what men might think or say. She
had reveled in rich clothing and jewels; henceforth, so far as her friends would
permit her, she would clothe herself literally in rags. She had slept on
luxurious couches; henceforth she would lie only on the hard ground. Her beauty,
which had been her ruin, and the ruin of many others besides, and which even
now, at twenty-seven, won for her many a glance of admiration as she passed down
the street, she was determined to destroy. She cut her face, she injured it with
bruises, till men would no longer care to look upon her. Nay, she would go
abroad, and where she had sinned most she would make most amends. She would go
to Montepulciano; there she would hire a woman to lead her like a beast with a
rope round her neck, and cry: “Look at Margaret, the sinner.” It needed a strong
and wise confessor to keep her within bounds.
Nor was this done only to atone
for the past. For years the old cravings were upon her; they had taken deep root
and could not at once be rooted out; even to the end of her life she had reason
to fear them. Sometimes she would ask herself how long she could continue the
fight; sometimes it would be that there was no need, that she should live her
life like ordinary mortals. Sometimes again, and this would often come from
those about her, it would be suggested to her that all her efforts were only a
proof of sheer pride. In many ways we are given to see that with all the
sanctity and close union with God which she afterwards attained, Margaret to the
end was very human; she was the same Margaret, however chastened, that she had
been at the beginning. “My father,” she said to her confessor one day, “do not
ask me to give in to this body of mine. I cannot afford it. Between me and my
body there must needs be a struggle until death.”
The rest of Margaret’s life
is a wonderful record of the way God deals with his penitents. There were her
child and herself to be kept, and the fathers wisely bade her earn her own
bread. She began by nursing; soon she confined her nursing to the poor, herself
living on alms. She retired to a cottage of her own; here, like St. Francis
before her, she made it her rule to give her labor to whoever sought it, and to
receive in return whatever they chose to give. In return there grew in her a new
understanding of that craving for love which had led her into danger. She saw
that it never would be satisfied here on earth; she must have more than this
world could give her or none at all. And here God was good to her. He gave her
an intimate knowledge of Himself; we might say He humored her by letting her
realize His love, His care, His watchfulness over her. With all her fear of
herself, which was never far away, she grew in confidence because she knew that
now she was loved by one who would not fail her. This became the character of
her sanctity, founded on that natural trait which was at once her strength and
her weakness.
And it is on this account, more than on account of the mere
fact that she was a penitent, that she deserves the title of the Second
Magdalene. Of the first Magdalene we know this, that she was an intense human
being, seeking her own fulfillment at extremes, now in sin, now in repentance
regardless of what men might think, uniting love and sorrow so closely that she
is forgiven, not for her sorrow so much as for her love. We know that ever
afterwards it was the same; the thought of her sin never kept her from her Lord,
the knowledge of His love drew her ever closer to Him, till, after Calvary, she
is honored the first among those to whom He would show Himself alone. And in
that memorable scene we have the two traits which sum her up; He reveals Himself
by calling her by her name: “Mary,” and yet, when she would cling about His
feet, as she had done long before, He bids her not to touch Him. In Margaret of
Cortona the character, and the treatment, are parallel. She did not forget what
she had been; but from the first the thought of this never for a moment kept her
from Our Lord. She gave herself to penance, but the motive of her penance, as
her revelations show, was love more than atonement. In her extremes of penance
she had no regard for the opinions of men; she would brave any obstacle that she
might draw the nearer to Him. At first He humored her; He drew her by revealing
to her His appreciation of her love; He even condescended so far as to call her
“Child,” when she had grown tired of being called “Poverella.” But later, when
the time for the greatest graces came, then He took her higher by seeming to
draw more apart; it was the scene of “Noli me tangere” repeated.

This
must suffice for an account of the wonderful graces and revelations that were
poured out on Margaret during the last twenty-three years of her life. She came
to Cortona as a penitent when she was twenty-seven. For three years the
Franciscan fathers kept her on her trial, before they would admit her to the
Third Order of St. Francis. She submitted to the condition; during that time she
earned her bread, entirely in the service of others. Then she declined to earn
it; while she labored in service no less, she would take in return only what was
given to her in alms. Soon even this did not satisfy her; she was not content
till the half of what was given her in charity was shared with others who seemed
to her more needy. Then out of this there grew other things, for Margaret had a
practical and organizing mind. She founded institutions of charity, she
established an institution of ladies who would spend themselves in the service
of the poor and suffering. She took a large part in the keeping of order in that
turbulent countryside; even her warlike bishop was compelled to listen to her,
and to surrender much of his plunder at her bidding. Like St. Catherine of Siena
after her, Margaret is a wonderful instance, not only of the mystic combined
with the soul of action, but more of the soul made one of action because it was
a mystic, and by means of its mystical insight.

Margaret died in 1297,
being just fifty years of age. Her confessor and first biographer tells us that
one day, shortly before her death, she had a vision of St. Mary Magdalene, “most
faithful of Christ’s apostles, clothed in a robe as it were of silver, and
crowned with a crown of precious gems, and surrounded by the holy angels.” And
whilst she was in this ecstasy Christ spoke to Margaret, saying: “My Eternal
Father said of Me to the Baptist: This is My beloved Son; so do I say to thee of
Magdalene: This is my beloved daughter.” On another occasion we are told that
“she was taken in spirit to the feet of Christ, which she washed with her tears
as did Magdalene of old; and as she wiped His feet she desired greatly to behold
His face, and prayed to the Lord to grant her this favor.” Thus to the end we
see she was the same; and yet the difference!
They buried her in the church
of St. Basil in Cortona. Around her body, and later at her tomb, her confessor
tells us that so many miracles, physical and spiritual, were worked that he
could fill a volume with the record of those which he personally knew alone. And
today Cortona boasts of nothing more sacred or more treasured than that same
body, which lies there still incorrupt, after more than six centuries, for
everyone to see.

Original post:

CATHOLIC NEWS WORLD : WED. MAY 16, 2012

Read More

Contraceptives in the rain…

Thursday, May 17, 2012

When a new synthetic substance is created, or a naturally occurring substance is generated at greatly increased levels, the effects can be far longer-lasting and wider-reaching than its manufacturers predict or intend. Some well-known examples of this include asbestos, a popular insulation and flame retardant in the late 19th century, which was later discovered to be carcinogenic; and polystyrene foams like Styrofoam, which is frequently used in disposable packaging, yet takes hundreds of years to break down once discarded. In the case of oral contraceptives, the key ingredients are synthetic hormones known as progestins, which mimic progesterone, either alone or combined with estrogen. When used therapeutically in contraceptive pills or in hormone replacement treatments for menopause, these synthetic hormones make their way into the water supply after being excreted in the patients’ urine. As environmental contaminants, these are referred to as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), due to the fact that they interfere with the endocrine systems of humans and animals alike following exposure.

While its impact is still being widely studied, there is no doubt that the exposure is occurring: multiple international studies have documented elevated levels of natural and synthetic hormones in drinking water, and one such study conducted in France noted that progestins in particular were more resistant to removal by water treatment methods, compared with other types of pharmaceuticals [3].

Due to the accumulation of synthetic steroids in water, much of the research conducted on its impact has been done using water-dwelling vertebrates such as fish and frogs. An ever-increasing collection of studies report harmful effects of these hormones on aquatic vertebrates, particularly with regard to their reproduction, as would be predicted given the nature of the contaminants [4]. One study focused on the effects of exposure to the progestin Levonorgestrel (LNG) on the frog Xenopus tropicalis. While the male reproductive system did not appear to be impaired, female tadpoles exhibited severe defects in the development of their ovaries and oviducts, rendering them sterile [5]. [SOURCE]

More reason to stay away from the infernal Pill.

Read this article:

Contraceptives in the rain…

Read More

Even the CBC admits museum is reeling over sex-hibition; time to finish it off

Thursday, May 17, 2012

It’s time to move in for the kill.

Even the CBC, of all people, is reporting on the public furor over the sex-hibition at the Museum of Science and Technology. Check it out:

Canada’s Science and Technology Museum in Ottawa has raised the age limit for admission to a controversial sex exhibit after dozens of complaints about the content.

As well, animated video informing children about masturbation has been removed.

The moves followed complaints about the exhibit called Sex: A Tell-All Exhibition.

“The museum has received a higher-than-expected amount of expressions of concerns from the public,” spokesman Yves St-Onge told Reuters. (Source)

Reuters? Good grief! You mean the whole world now knows about this? They must think Canadians are a bunch of pervs!

Heritage Minister James Moore spoke out against the exhibit during Question Period, but his spokesman went even further:

Moore’s spokesman, James Maunder, had earlier said the purpose of the Museum of Science and Technology is to foster scientific and technological literacy.

“It is clear this exhibit does not fit within that mandate,” Maunder told CBC News. “Its content cannot be defended, and is insulting to taxpayers.”

My sentiments exactly.

I even saw CBC covering it on TV this evening! Clearly we’ve rocked the boat big time. Give credit to the Ottawa Sun for doing an excellent article on it yesterday, from which I drew inspiration for my complaint to the government.

For those of you that haven’t complained yet, give yourself the satisfaction of dealing the fatal blow. My earlier post gives you the email addresses you need.


This entry was posted on Thursday, May 17th, 2012 at 6:09 pm and is filed under Gutter Morality, Pornography. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Link:

Even the CBC admits museum is reeling over sex-hibition; time to finish it off

Read More

Pope: Eastern Churches embody "spiritual richness"

Thursday, May 17, 2012

2012-05-18 Vatican Radio

Pope Benedict XVI met with the final group of bishops from the United States coming to Rome on their

ad limina

visits. The 15 bishops were from the various Eastern Churches present in the United States.

In his remarks, the Pope pointed out the Eastern Churches, “embody in a unique way the ethnic, cultural and spiritual richness of the American Catholic community, past and present.”

He added that historically “the Church in America has struggled to recognize and incorporate this diversity, and has succeeded, not without difficulty, in forging a communion in Christ and in the apostolic faith which mirrors the catholicity which is an indefectible mark of the Church.”

Pope Benedict also said “the Church in America is called to embrace, incorporate and cultivate the rich patrimony of faith and culture present in America’s many immigrant groups, including not only those of your own rites, but also the swelling numbers of Hispanic, Asian and African Catholics.”

Below is the full text of Pope Benedict XVI’s full remarks:

Dear Brother Bishops,
I greet all of you with fraternal affection in the Lord. Our meeting today concludes the series of quinquennial visits of the Bishops of the United States of America ad limina Apostolorum. As you know, over these past six months I have wished to reflect with you and your Brother Bishops on a number of pressing spiritual and cultural challenges facing the Church in your country as it takes up the task of the new evangelization.
I am particularly pleased that this, our final meeting, takes place in the presence of the Bishops of the various Eastern Churches present in the United States, since you and your faithful embody in a unique way the ethnic, cultural and spiritual richness of the American Catholic community, past and present. Historically, the Church in America has struggled to recognize and incorporate this diversity, and has succeeded, not without difficulty, in forging a communion in Christ and in the apostolic faith which mirrors the catholicity which is an indefectible mark of the Church. In this communion, which finds its source and model in the mystery of the Triune God (cf. Lumen Gentium, 4), unity and diversity are constantly reconciled and enhanced, as a sign and sacrament of the ultimate vocation and destiny of the entire human family.
Throughout our meetings, you and your Brother Bishops have spoken insistently of the importance of preserving, fostering and advancing this gift of Catholic unity as an essential condition for the fulfilment of the Church’s mission in your country. In this concluding talk, I would like simply to touch on two specific points which have recurred in our discussions and which, with you, I consider crucial for the exercise of your ministry of guiding Christ’s flock forward amid the difficulties and opportunities of the present moment.
I would begin by praising your unremitting efforts, in the best traditions of the Church in America, to respond to the ongoing phenomenon of immigration in your country. The Catholic community in the United States continues, with great generosity, to welcome waves of new immigrants, to provide them with pastoral care and charitable assistance, and to support ways of regularizing their situation, especially with regard to the unification of families. A particular sign of this is the long-standing commitment of the American Bishops to immigration reform. This is clearly a difficult and complex issue from the civil and political, as well as the social and economic, but above all from the human point of view. It is thus of profound concern to the Church, since it involves ensuring the just treatment and the defence of the human dignity of immigrants.
In our day too, the Church in America is called to embrace, incorporate and cultivate the rich patrimony of faith and culture present in America’s many immigrant groups, including not only those of your own rites, but also the swelling numbers of Hispanic, Asian and African Catholics. The demanding pastoral task of fostering a communion of cultures within your local Churches must be considered of particular importance in the exercise of your ministry at the service of unity (cf. Directory for the Pastoral Ministry of Bishops, 63). This diaconia of communion entails more than simply respecting linguistic diversity, promoting sound traditions, and providing much-needed social programs and services. It also calls for a commitment to ongoing preaching, catechesis and pastoral activity aimed at inspiring in all the faithful a deeper sense of their communion in the apostolic faith and their responsibility for the Church’s mission in the United States. Nor can the significance of this challenge be underestimated: the immense promise and the vibrant energies of a new generation of Catholics are waiting to be tapped for the renewal of the Church’s life and the rebuilding of the fabric of American society.
This commitment to fostering Catholic unity is necessary not only for meeting the positive challenges of the new evangelization but also countering the forces of disgregation within the Church which increasingly represent a grave obstacle to her mission in the United States. I appreciate the efforts being made to encourage the faithful, individually and in the variety of ecclesial associations, to move forward together, speaking with one voice in addressing the urgent problems of the present moment. Here I would repeat the heartfelt plea that I made to America’s Catholics during my Pastoral Visit: “We can only move forward if we turn our gaze together to Christ” and thus embrace “that true spiritual renewal desired by the Council, a renewal which can only strengthen the Church in that holiness and unity indispensable for the effective proclamation of the Gospel in today’s world” (Homily in Saint Patrick’s Cathedral, New York, 19 April 2008).
In our conversations, many of you have spoken of your concern to build ever stronger relationships of friendship, cooperation and trust with your priests. At the present time, too, I urge you to remain particularly close to the men and women in your local Churches who are committed to following Christ ever more perfectly by generously embracing the evangelical counsels. I wish to reaffirm my deep gratitude for the example of fidelity and self-sacrifice given by many consecrated women in your country, and to join them in praying that this moment of discernment will bear abundant spiritual fruit for the revitalization and strengthening of their communities in fidelity to Christ and the Church, as well as to their founding charisms. The urgent need in our own time for credible and attractive witnesses to the redemptive and transformative power of the Gospel makes it essential to recapture a sense of the sublime dignity and beauty of the consecrated life, to pray for religious vocations and to promote them actively, while strengthening existing channels for communication and cooperation, especially through the work of the Vicar or Delegate for Religious in each Diocese.
Dear Brother Bishops, it is my hope that the Year of Faith which will open on 12 October this year, the fiftieth anniversary of the convening of the Second Vatican Council, will awaken a desire on the part of the entire Catholic community in America to reappropriate with joy and gratitude the priceless treasure of our faith. With the progressive weakening of traditional Christian values, and the threat of a season in which our fidelity to the Gospel may cost us dearly, the truth of Christ needs not only to be understood, articulated and defended, but to be proposed joyfully and confidently as the key to authentic human fulfilment and to the welfare of society as a whole.
Now, at the conclusion of these meetings, I willingly join all of you in thanking Almighty God for the signs of new vitality and hope with which he has blessed the Church in the United States of America. At the same time I ask him to confirm you and your Brother Bishops in your delicate mission of guiding the Catholic community in your country in the ways of unity, truth and charity as it faces the challenges of the future. In the words of the ancient prayer, let us ask the Lord to direct our hearts and those of our people, that the flock may never fail in obedience to its shepherds, nor the shepherds in the care of the flock (cf. Sacramentarium Veronense, Missa de natale Episcoporum). With great affection I commend you, and the clergy, religious and lay faithful entrusted to your pastoral care, to the loving intercession of Mary Immaculate, Patroness of the United States, and I cordially impart my Apostolic Blessing as a pledge of joy and peace in the Lord.

See the original article here:

Pope: Eastern Churches embody "spiritual richness"

Read More

Katholikentag meets in Germany

Thursday, May 17, 2012

2012-05-18 Vatican Radio

The German Church is holding its bi-annual meeting, more commonly known as Katholikentag, in Mannheim, with over 30 thousand participants and guests assembled to discuss, worship, celebrate and share the current state of the Church in Pope Benedict XVI’s homeland. Before.listening to a report from Jesuit Father Bernd Hagenkord who heads Vatican Radio’s German Programme and who’s currently in Mannheim Veronica Scarisbrick shines the spotlight for a moment on this organisation as well as take a look at Pope Benedict’s recent words to the members of this organisation .

As we know from the 22-25 September 2011 Pope Benedict visited Germany. The choice of cities on this second visit back to the homeland included the nation’s capital Berlin ( this was his first official visit to the nation) , Erfurt the land of Luther and finally Freiburg, the city whose inhabitants decided in 1520 not to take part in the Reformation, proving their independence from outside influence. The city was not named Freiburg meaning “free borough” for nothing.

It was here in what is Catholic territory in the South West tip of Germany, ruled for centuries by the Catholic Habsburgs that he dedicated time to this lay organization which in Germany wields a lot of influence. Even Catholic members of Parliament adhere to it.

The Katholikentag then as it’s popularly referred to is an organisation called ‘Zentralkomitee derr Deutschen Katholiken’ , or ‘Central Committee of German Catholics ‘ led by its President Mr Alois Gluck. A lay apostolate founded in 1952 which grew out of an earlier 19th century movement. One which seamlessly combines independence with loyalty to the Church, and commitment within the Church with social and political action.

While in Germany the Holy Father addressed representatives of this lay apostolate , speaking to them of new evangelization. On this occasion among the other issues he touched on was that of how high standards of living do not exclude poverty in human relations and poverty in the religious sphere.

But on Thursday Benedict XVI also addressed the current Katholikentag gathering in Mannheim. Picking up on new evangelization he began by quoting the motto of this meeting : “ Daring to begin afresh’. A renewal which stems from God, the Pope said must always follow a personal path which leads to God . We are called to grow in faith as well as live accordingly in our daily lives. But we are not alone or isolated from others. We believe together and within the community of the Church. The path to God begins for all faithful both within and with the Church .

This 98th Katholikentag, Benedict XVI went on to say is in a sense the first step towards the Year of Faith called to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the opening session of the Second Vatican Council .

Having touched there briefly on Pope Benedict’s words, we now bring you Jesuit Father Bernd Hagenkord’s report :
“The book containing all the events of this „Katholikentag“ is nearly 600 pages long, all 1.200 events show the breadth and length of the catholic Church in Germany. There are lectures and discussions, there are presentations and new initiatives, and as during every „Katholikentag“ the city is strewn with white tents, every one of them containing an initiative, parish, diocese, association, or other catholic organization. Ecumenism, mission, parish organization, moral theology, music, social responsibility: There seems to be no topic not represented here. The whole four day meeting is framed by liturgies and prayer-services.

A particular focus this year is local Church. For lack of money, of priests many parishes have had to be merged with other parishes, creating administrative units rather than living communities. So the focus is on how to make this work and how to bring to life this changing structure with new initiatives or ideas.

This meeting of Catholics shows the signs of the times. Alois Gluck, president of the German Catholics lay council which organizes the „Katholikentag“, comments during a press conference on the character of the event. It shows the signs of the times to the church as well as the contribution the Church can make to the society. The event wants to inspire all those coming here.

This seems to be a rather necessary thing, since the Church perceives itself as being in crisis. After the sex-abuse scandals and the loss of significant numbers of Catholics, many perceive the church as being stale or numb, without answers to today’s crisis or challenges. Therefore the title of the meeting is „Aufbruch“ – meaning departure as well as new start. The Church – hierarchy as well as laity – want to find a way out of what Alois Gluck called the inner blockade in many questions. The price to pay is to give up a lot of much-loved customs or structures. However, this is necessary to move the Church forward. How to do this: to discuss that is what this Katholikentag is for. “
Listen :

More here: 

Katholikentag meets in Germany

Read More

World Communications Day:“Silence and Word"

Thursday, May 17, 2012

2012-05-18 Vatican Radio

“Silence and Word: path of evangelization” – that’s the theme chosen by Pope Benedict XVI for the Church’s 46

th

World Day for Communications, celebrated each year on the Sunday before Pentecost – on Sunday May 20

th

this year.

The Pope traditionally releases his message for the occasion on January 24, the feast day of St. Francis de Sales, the patron saint of writers.

But does this year’s message represent a contradiction in terms?

Fr. Jean-Pierre Ruiz thinks not. He is a biblical scholar and Theology professor at St. John’s University in New York, and he’s an expert in new media. He says the Pope’s choice of “silence and word” as a theme for evangelization and communication is “strangely eloquent…because we live in a world where words in a certain sense have become a cheapened commodity and where people say very often much less than they actually mean.”

Fr. Ruiz reminds us that “the Church has been about communicating not only by words, for a very long time – in fact, from the beginning.”

He explains “the Church’s liturgy for example is not just reading, it’s not just text, it’s not merely just what we say – it’s also the attitude of our bodies, it’s also sound without words in terms of instrumental liturgical music.”

“It involves the use of all of our senses: our sense of smell in terms of incense and the flowers used to decorate the sanctuary for the Eucharistic liturgy. So I think if we were to reduce communications to just mere words, I think we would be impoverished.”

In this program by Tracey McClure, we report on what Pope Benedict says in his Message for World Communications Day and hear Fr. Ruiz’s comments -
Listen:

Visit site - 

World Communications Day:“Silence and Word"

Read More

Pope: telegram to the president of OPAM

Thursday, May 17, 2012

2012-05-18 Vatican Radio

Below please find the complete text of the Holy Father’s telegram to the President of Institution for the Promotion of Literacy in the World (OPAM):

Pope Benedict XVI sent his heartfelt greetings to the to the International Congress marking 40 years of the Institution for the Promotion of Literacy in the World (OPAM), which is meeting on the theme “Fragile Humanism: Lessons for the World.” Assuring them of his spiritual closeness, he encouraged them to continue, with renewed vigour, their efforts to promote education in the most disadvantaged countries. This should be done in a manner that favours the mutual enrichment of diverse cultures and fraternity among ecclesial communities. He sends to you and to the collaborators, the presenters, and the associates of OPAM, and to all the participants in the Congress, his Apostolic Blessing.

Read original article: 

Pope: telegram to the president of OPAM

Read More

Water contamination and Blood Clots: What Contraception Has Wrought

Thursday, May 17, 2012




Water contamination and Blood Clots: What Contraception Has Wrought


Posted on May 17th, 2012 by Paycheck in Contraception

May 16, 2012 — Women who use transdermal patches or vaginal rings for contraception may be at significantly increased risk for venous thromboembolism compared with women who do not use hormonal contraception, according to a national registry-based Danish study published online May 10 in the British Medical Journal.

…

While its impact is still being widely studied, there is no doubt that the exposure is occurring: multiple international studies have documented elevated levels of natural and synthetic hormones in drinking water, and one such study conducted in France noted that progestins in particular were more resistant to removal by water treatment methods, compared with other types of pharmaceuticals [3]. Due to the accumulation of synthetic steroids in water, much of the research conducted on its impact has been done using water-dwelling vertebrates such as fish and frogs. An ever-increasing collection of studies report harmful effects of these hormones on aquatic vertebrates, particularly with regard to their reproduction, as would be predicted given the nature of the contaminants [4]. One study focused on the effects of exposure to the progestin Levonorgestrel (LNG) on the frog Xenopus tropicalis. While the male reproductive system did not appear to be impaired, female tadpoles exhibited severe defects in the development of their ovaries and oviducts, rendering them sterile [5]… (Source)


This entry was posted on Thursday, May 17th, 2012 at 5:50 pm and is filed under Contraception. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

See original article here - 

Water contamination and Blood Clots: What Contraception Has Wrought

Read More

I Wannabe a Superhero

Thursday, May 17, 2012

I tell the boys in school that they should be a priest because every boy wants to wear a cape and a cool hat and do amazing things, and what other profession is there today in which you can wear a cape (except being a French policeman) So capes and hats and feats of derring do is what I want, and what’s wrong with wanting to be a superhero?

That is to say, I want to be a super- natural hero–a hero of the supernatural is what I mean, and this all came to me this morning while I was celebrating Mass.

I realized suddenly again in the midst of concentrating on the words and the actions that I totally completely, utterly without reservation and without doubt and without any shadow of misinterpretation believed the whole thing. All of it. The Creation of the World by God the Father Almighty, the Incarnation of his Son Jesus Christ our Lord who took human flesh from the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and Queen of Heaven. I believed and trusted fully in the Divine Mercy, the saving work of Jesus Christ on the cross, the redeeming Blood of the Lamb of God–a sacrifice once offered for my sins and the sins of the whole world, and re-presented on the altars and only on the altars of Christ’s One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. I fully and totally believed in the transubstantiation of the bread and wine into the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ who is risen ascended and glorified and now sits at the right hand of the Father in Glory everlasting.

There’s more. I believe in the rest of the stuff too. The incorrupt bodies of saints and apparitions of the Queen of Heaven to peasant children. I believe in the stigmata and the miracles in the Bible and the Book of Revelation and the Wise Men and the Star of Bethlehem and the Shroud of Turin and levitating saints. I believe in answers to prayer and if you push me I will even confound you by believing that a big fish really did swallow Jonah and spit him up angry and smelling of vomit and that Elijah was fed by ravens and Moses split wide the Red Sea and that God does miracles today.

Now you might say that this is nothing really very special, and that this is, after all, what all Catholics should fully and totally believe, and that it is certainly what a Catholic priest should believe, but when it hit me in the middle of saying Mass it also hit me how bizarre and unusual this way of looking at the world really is. Read more.

See the article here - 

I Wannabe a Superhero

Read More

Down to Earth

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Down to Earth

May 17, 2012 by Ellen Gable Hrkach

Our latest cartoon from Family Foundations copyright 2012 Full Quiver Publishing

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Email
  • Digg

Like this:

Like

Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Catholicity, Family Life | Tagged Family Life cartoon Hrkach | Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Visit site: 

Down to Earth

Read More

Toronto Catholic school hosts ‘transgendered’ Miss Universe contestant

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Toronto Catholic school hosts ‘transgendered’ Miss Universe contestant

Posted onMay 17, 2012by John Laws

Miss Universe contestant “Jenna” Talackova poses for a shot with a young girl outside of St. John Vianney Catholic School on Tuesday.

A Toronto Catholic elementary school is under fire after hosting a “transgendered” Miss Universe Canada contestant on Tuesday in the run-up to the annual spectacle this weekend.

The event, owned by Donald Trump, has often been criticized for its hyper-emphasis on women’s sexual values and displays of women in skimpy bikinis.

Gwen Landolt, national vice-president of REAL Women Canada, says the Catholic school event sent the message to young girls that they need to be “sexy and glamorous.” (more…)

Toronto Catholic school hosts ‘transgendered’ Miss Universe contestant

Like this:

Like

Be the first to like this post.

About John Laws

Catholic, married, pro-life, pro-family, parent. Active in the Knights of Columbus. Member of the staff at The Interim, Canada’s Life and Family Newspaper.


View all posts by John Laws

This entry was posted in

News and politics

. Bookmark the

permalink

.

Read this article - 

Toronto Catholic school hosts ‘transgendered’ Miss Universe contestant

Read More

Pelosi: No to Provision Protecting Chaplains From Being Ordered to Act Against Faith

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Read more:

Pelosi: No to Provision Protecting Chaplains From Being Ordered to Act Against Faith

Read More

Iowa bishop reverses decision, allows LGBT scholarship award at Catholic high school

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Bishop Martin J. Amos caused a national media uproar on Monday after he stated that the award should not be a public part of Fuller’s graduation ceremony.

Keaton Fuller is the recipient of the Eychaner Foundation’s Gold Matthew Shephard Scholarship

CLINTON, Iowa, May 17, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Catholic Diocese of Davenport, Iowa has reversed its decision disallowing the public presentation of an LGBT scholarship at a local Catholic high school, and has directed a school official to read the award’s description at the school’s commencement.

The Eychaner Foundation’s Gold Matthew Shephard Scholarship, which carries a $40,000 reward for students who excel academically while promoting “tolerance and diversity,” is to be awarded to Keaton Fuller, a senior at Prince of Peace College Prep in Clinton, Iowa.

Bishop Martin J. Amos caused a national media uproar on Monday after he stated that, while the award’s monetary value should still be given to Fuller, the award should not be a public part of Fuller’s graduation ceremony as the Foundation had planned. The decision overruled school officials, who had helped Fuller, who is openly homosexual, apply for the award.

Following the severe backlash, the diocese days later released a statement declaring it had reached an agreement with the Eychaner Foundation that involved having the Superintendent of Schools, instead of a Foundation representative, read the prepared script describing the award.

Click “like” if you want to defend true marriage.

The script includes an acknowledgement that selection for the award is based in part on “community service, especially that which promotes tolerance and diversity,” and describes Fuller’s achievement in having “shared his story” after being initially “introverted and depressed when contemplating coming out.”

The Diocese on its website thanked the Eychaner Foundation for dialoguing on the issue and praised the nonprofit group’s mission. http://davenportdiocese.org/comm/commpr.htm

“Regardless of the different views held by Mr. Eychaner and the Diocese on same sex marriage, the work of the Foundation for tolerance and respect for all people is commendable, especially regarding the anti-bullying programs they advocate,” it stated. The Foundation, which had joined the media push to present the award, also thanked Bishop Amos. http://www.eychanerfoundation.org/news/item/agreement-reached-between-the-eychaner-foundation-and-the-diocese-of-davenport.html

The Eychaner Foundation was founded by Rich Eychaner, Iowa’s first openly homosexual candidate for federal office and a longtime gay rights advocate. Multimillionaire Chicago mogul Fred Eychaner, Rich Eychaner’s brother who is also openly homosexual, ranks alongside George Soros as one of America’s top financiers of the Democrat party.

Deacon David Montgomery, Davenport’s Director of Communication, responded to one individual’s query on the issue by saying that “Bishop Amos and the Diocese of Davenport are not promoting the homosexual agenda at a Catholic high school.”

“We are recognizing the academic achievements of a student who has worked hard to earn his graduation,” said Montgomery. “The statement from the Eychaner Foundation that will be read by the diocesan superintendant of schools at the presentation of the award is attached. The statement opposes anti-gay rhetoric and hate crimes. It does not contain any position that is contrary to Catholic teaching.”

Montgomery did not immediately return a request for comment from LifeSiteNews.com.

Originally posted here: 

Iowa bishop reverses decision, allows LGBT scholarship award at Catholic high school

Read More

Why there is a shortage in religious orders

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Decay caused by a false reform and a distorted understanding of the evangelical counsels (poverty, chastity, and obedience)


By Paul Kokoski
Special to The B.C. Catholic

Archbishop J. Michael Miller, CSB, joins the Missionaries of Charity and seminarians in praying in front of the Blessed Sacrament. BCC file photo.
I am glad to read about the Vatican announcing a major reform of women’s religious in the U.S. (reported in The B.C. Catholic April 30 issue, Page 16).

The reform comes in light of their hardened defi ance of Catholic morality in areas of family life and human sexuality, and is meant to ensure the nuns’ fi delity to Catholic teaching in areas including abortion, euthanasia, women’s ordination, and homosexuality.

We often hear about a priest shortage, but perhaps less often that most religious communities, great and small, male and female, contemplative, active, or mixed, have been reduced to a fraction of their numbers in the past 50 years.

The cause of the decay has been a false reform and a distorted understanding of the evangelical counsels (poverty, chastity, and obedience). They have been taken as a psychological and sociological outlook rather than the basis for a state of life structured in accordance with the counsel Christ gives in the Gospels.

True renewal calls for an adaptation of external activities with a view to a more effective pursuit of holiness. It is begotten by a disgust with weakening of discipline and by a desire for a life that is more spiritual, more prayerful, more austere.

Today religious orders question themselves, confront experiences, demand creativity, search for a new identity (which implies each is becoming something other than itself), and move toward building “true communities” (as if for centuries past religious orders had consisted entirely of false communities).

Ultimately the crisis among religious is the result of an excessive conforming to the world, and a taking up of the world’s positions because one has despaired of winning the world over to one’s own.

A by no means small or unimportant sign of this alienation is the change in the dress of members of religious orders, inspired by a wish to be less different from secular persons.

This lack of clarity about religious life today has a parallel in the priesthood. On one hand there is obfuscation of the difference between the sacramental priesthood and the priesthood of all believers; and on the other, of the difference between the state of perfection and the common state. What is specific to religious life is washed out or watered down in thought and behaviour.

Take, for example, the three evangelical counsels, which are essential to religious life.

Today there is a certain distaste for chastity. A decline in delicacy and care are obvious not only in the widespread slackness in clerical dress, but in the more frequent mixing of the sexes, even on journeys, and in the abandonment of the precautions adopted even by great and holy men.

Lowering the principle of authority and mixing it up with a kind of fraternal relationship, by means of a fruitful dialogue, has lowered the concept of obedience. True Catholic obedience implies submission to the will of the superior – so long as the command is not manifestly illicit – and not a reexamination of the superior’s command by the one obeying.

Catholic obedience does not seek a coinciding of the wills of subject and superiors. Such an agreement negates any sacrifice of one’s own will by conforming it to somebody
else’s. It ultimately produces self-government, self-teaching, self-education, and even selfredemption.

This weakening in obedience has lead to a weakening of the spirit of unity. Individuals are now left to do the things proper to the religious state as if the community did not exist. Mass is said at any time, prayer is left to the spirituality of each person.

It is easy to see why some religious institutes have disappeared.

It is a contradiction in terms to join a community to do, individually, things one has joined the community to do in common.

In 2005, before his papal election, the future Pope Benedict XVI issued a resounding call for reform of religious life. He lamented, “How much filth there is in the Church, and
even among those in the priesthood.”

In May 2010 he reiterated this plea, stating: “Today we see in a really terrifying way that the greatest persecution of the Church does not come from the enemies outside, but is born from the sin in the Church.”

These exhortations were widely interpreted as references to the sex-abuse scandal affecting the Church’s standing in North America and other parts of the world. However, the Pope’s comments were also directed more widely to the phenomenon of modernism that is poisoning the Church at its core.

This modernism is the result of decades of liberal exegetical, theological, and “pastoral” creativity in the name of Vatican II. One of the key areas where modernism has been allowed to take root and spread is among women religious.

Thankfully there are still some contemplative orders who have never given up the vision of the eternal Church and have passed this on to younger religious, who in scattered
places preserve the apostolic faith much as the monks did on their lonely islands during the Dark Ages.

This gives hope the Church will be revitalized, becoming once more a vehicle for re-Christianizing the world.

See more here:  

Why there is a shortage in religious orders

Read More

Catholic News Roundup 05-17

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Student Healthcare Eliminated The Obama Administration is causing one Catholic University to completely shut down health insurance plans for students altogether.TheBlaze.comObama’s Manager … Catholic Traitor A former Catholic has been named Obama’s new religious outreach director for his 2012 re-election campaign.TheBlaze.comMontana’s Contraception Mandate A district court judge says Montana is required by its state constitution to provide contraception to teenage kids.

Read more: 

Catholic News Roundup 05-17

Read More

Mother, 21, Beats Cancer after refusing to Abort! Yay! Marriage? Meh. UPDATED

Thursday, May 17, 2012


Photocredit: Caters News Agency

This is one of those stories that tells you something wonderful about young people and the faith, and also something not so wonderful:

The wonderful: This 21 year-old mother was advised to abort her second child in order to begin chemotherapy for cancer; she refused and got the “win-win” – a healthy baby and full recovery:

When Daniella Jackson was diagnosed with cancer at five months pregnant her doctors quickly advised her to have an abortion . . But the 21-year-old, who is a devout Roman Catholic, refused, saying she felt too close to her unborn child. A year on, she is the proud mother of Rennae – her second child – and has been told that she is free of cancer . . . Aborting her child was never an option because of her strong faith, Miss Jackson insisted.

Heroic and inspirational. God bless Daniella and her babies, and her partner of 5 years, Andrew. They made a tough decision — one many people would not understand or support, and called it a no-brainer, to boot. It takes guts and trust; it often takes guts to trust.

But did you note the part about her “partner of 5 years?”

Yeah, that’s the thing to not feel great about, as a church. Andrew and Daniella are clearly committed to each other and are raising two children together. Daniella says her religion informed her thinking:

Abortion is not part of my belief as a Catholic. Religion was part of my decision. I wanted to fight for my baby.’

Again, that’s so heartening. And yet religion has not, apparently, informed her decision as to marriage, and one has to ask why that is? Clearly, young people Europe and in America are moving away from marriage. In the U.S., Catholic marriages have dropped from 415,487 in 1972 to only 179,000 in 2010. That same year fewer than 8,500 Catholic marriages were performed in all of England and Wales, compared to 44,931 in 1968.

Why do young Catholics feel no need to marry? I agree with Emily Stimpson, here, when she writes that part of it is rooted in our culture of no-fault divorce, and that part of it is a failure on the part of the church to teach the sacramental nature of marriage, or why marriage matters at all.

Writes Stimpson:

When it comes to showing the culture how marriage is supposed to work—the beauty, the glory, and the meaning of it all—we kind of stink . . . Roughly 25 percent of Catholic marriages end in divorce. Most Catholic couples married in the last decade cohabitated before marriage. Few unmarried Catholics remain chaste. And more than 5.5 million Catholics have divorced and remarried without an annulment.

She gives a worthy exhortation to her fellow Catholics:

Priests can speak out more on the nature of marriage from the pulpit and challenge parishioners personally when we’re not at least striving to live what the Church believes. They can offer marriages in crisis help, not a wink, a nod, and directions to the nearest tribunal. And they can give young couples preparing for marriage a heck of a lot more than a weekend retreat and an indulgent attitude towards their pre-marital living arrangements.

Us lay folks can do the same, chipping in to help build better Pre-Cana and marriage support programs in our parishes and dioceses. More importantly, we can take a serious look at our marriages, dating relationships, and sex lives and bring them back into line with the Church.

All true; also true is that if every Catholic couple suddenly pulled into line with the church, it would still take decades to effect a change in attitude and understand as to the nature and import of marriage. I don’t know if we can wait that long, or even if we need to. Must it take decades to teach? We can’t simply say it’s “commitment” or its “covenant.” Or even, “it’s an Office.”

At its heart, marriage is a mystery — it is a constant encounter with otherness and a reliance upon grace. People like a mystery, but how do we teach that? Why was it so understandable before, but not now?

“The mystery of the Incarnation, in which God draws near to us, also shows us the incomparable dignity of every human life. In his loving plan, from the beginning of creation, God has entrusted to the family founded on matrimony the most lofty mission of being the fundamental cell of society and an authentic domestic church. With this certainty, you, dear husbands and wives, are called to be, especially for your children, a real and visible sign of the love of Christ for the Church.”
— Pope Benedict XVI, Homily in Santiago de Cuba during Pope Benedict’s Apostolic Journey to Mexico and Cuba (March 26, 2012)

They’re very old, now, the young people who met-and-married in a matter of weeks or months during World War II or the Korean War. They barely knew each other, and often they “didn’t have a pot to p*ss in or a window to throw it out of” and yet their marriages endured.

My in-laws were poor as church mice when they married; they’ve been together for 55 years and both of their siblings have been married even longer; they’ve raised five boys, lost one a few years ago, which broke their hearts. They’ve worked hard, cried together, fought, loved. They still walk to Mass together every Sunday — every day, during Lent — getting their early to light candles and say a prayer or two, and to pat a friend hello as they pass in the pew. Theirs has been a great example of a mighty marriage — I don’t know two people who more profoundly embody the idea of service toward each other — and yet only three of their sons managed to marry successfully.

Yeah, marriage is a mystery. Perhaps marriages worked 50-60 years ago because that was a different generation, a more obedient, less stiff-necked generation. But I am not sure about that. There’s Daniella holding her baby, and she and Andrew appear to have “the right stuff” to forge a marriage that can endure all of that mystery, all of the challenges. One suspects she might be bothering with marriage if someone was just bothering to tell her why it’s any different from just living together with a partner.

The Incarnate Word did not have to come to us as a baby, raised within a family unit, with a mother and a father. He could have materialized fully-grown; or he could have come to Mary, alone — or, for that matter, to Joseph, alone. It matters that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us in a commonality we recognize; not as a lofty king, but as a boy in a family, with a mom and a dad. Would he have bothered, if it didn’t matter?

It’s worth pondering.

::::UPDATE:::: After reading this piece at The Catholic Thing I realize that I have no idea whether or not this couple is married. Apparently in the UK and Ireland, to use the term “husband” or “wife” has become a rudeness. Unreal.

Related: Dwelling in the possibilities of a “win-win”

Original post: 

Mother, 21, Beats Cancer after refusing to Abort! Yay! Marriage? Meh. UPDATED

Read More

Mother, 21, Beats Cancer after refusing to Abort! Yay! Marriage? Meh.

Thursday, May 17, 2012


Photocredit: Caters News Agency

This is one of those stories that tells you something wonderful about young people and the faith, and also something not so wonderful:

The wonderful: This 21 year-old mother was advised to abort her second child in order to begin chemotherapy for cancer; she refused and got the “win-win” – a healthy baby and full recovery:

When Daniella Jackson was diagnosed with cancer at five months pregnant her doctors quickly advised her to have an abortion . . But the 21-year-old, who is a devout Roman Catholic, refused, saying she felt too close to her unborn child. A year on, she is the proud mother of Rennae – her second child – and has been told that she is free of cancer . . . Aborting her child was never an option because of her strong faith, Miss Jackson insisted.

Heroic and inspirational. God bless Daniella and her babies, and her partner of 5 years, Andrew. They made a tough decision — one many people would not understand or support, and called it a no-brainer, to boot. It takes guts and trust; it often takes guts to trust.

But did you note the part about her “partner of 5 years?”

Yeah, that’s the thing to not feel great about, as a church. Andrew and Daniella are clearly committed to each other and are raising two children together. Daniella says her religion informed her thinking:

Abortion is not part of my belief as a Catholic. Religion was part of my decision. I wanted to fight for my baby.’

Again, that’s so heartening. And yet religion has not, apparently, informed her decision as to marriage, and one has to ask why that is? Clearly, young people Europe and in America are moving away from marriage. In the U.S., Catholic marriages have dropped from 415,487 in 1972 to only 179,000 in 2010. That same year fewer than 8,500 Catholic marriages were performed in all of England and Wales, compared to 44,931 in 1968.

Why do young Catholics feel no need to marry? I agree with Emily Stimpson, here, when she writes that part of it is rooted in our culture of no-fault divorce, and that part of it is a failure on the part of the church to teach the sacramental nature of marriage, or why marriage matters at all.

Writes Stimpson:

When it comes to showing the culture how marriage is supposed to work—the beauty, the glory, and the meaning of it all—we kind of stink . . . Roughly 25 percent of Catholic marriages end in divorce. Most Catholic couples married in the last decade cohabitated before marriage. Few unmarried Catholics remain chaste. And more than 5.5 million Catholics have divorced and remarried without an annulment.

She gives a worthy exhortation to her fellow Catholics:

Priests can speak out more on the nature of marriage from the pulpit and challenge parishioners personally when we’re not at least striving to live what the Church believes. They can offer marriages in crisis help, not a wink, a nod, and directions to the nearest tribunal. And they can give young couples preparing for marriage a heck of a lot more than a weekend retreat and an indulgent attitude towards their pre-marital living arrangements.

Us lay folks can do the same, chipping in to help build better Pre-Cana and marriage support programs in our parishes and dioceses. More importantly, we can take a serious look at our marriages, dating relationships, and sex lives and bring them back into line with the Church.

All true; also true is that if every Catholic couple suddenly pulled into line with the church, it would still take decades to effect a change in attitude and understand as to the nature and import of marriage. I don’t know if we can wait that long, or even if we need to. Must it take decades to teach? We can’t simply say it’s “commitment” or its “covenant.” Or even, “it’s an Office.”

At its heart, marriage is a mystery — it is a constant encounter with otherness and a reliance upon grace. People like a mystery, but how do we teach that? Why was it so understandable before, but not now?

“The mystery of the Incarnation, in which God draws near to us, also shows us the incomparable dignity of every human life. In his loving plan, from the beginning of creation, God has entrusted to the family founded on matrimony the most lofty mission of being the fundamental cell of society and an authentic domestic church. With this certainty, you, dear husbands and wives, are called to be, especially for your children, a real and visible sign of the love of Christ for the Church.”
— Pope Benedict XVI, Homily in Santiago de Cuba during Pope Benedict’s Apostolic Journey to Mexico and Cuba (March 26, 2012)

They’re very old, now, the young people who met-and-married in a matter of weeks or months during World War II or the Korean War. They barely knew each other, and often they “didn’t have a pot to p*ss in or a window to throw it out of” and yet their marriages endured.

My in-laws were poor as church mice when they married; they’ve been together for 55 years and both of their siblings have been married even longer; they’ve raised five boys, lost one a few years ago, which broke their hearts. They’ve worked hard, cried together, fought, loved. They still walk to Mass together every Sunday — every day, during Lent — getting their early to light candles and say a prayer or two, and to pat a friend hello as they pass in the pew. Theirs has been a great example of a mighty marriage — I don’t know two people who more profoundly embody the idea of service toward each other — and yet only three of their sons managed to marry successfully.

Yeah, marriage is a mystery. Perhaps marriages worked 50-60 years ago because that was a different generation, a more obedient, less stiff-necked generation. But I am not sure about that. There’s Daniella holding her baby, and she and Andrew appear to have “the right stuff” to forge a marriage that can endure all of that mystery, all of the challenges. One suspects she might be bothering with marriage if someone was just bothering to tell her why it’s any different from just living together with a partner.

The Incarnate Word did not have to come to us as a baby, raised within a family unit, with a mother and a father. He could have materialized fully-grown; or he could have come to Mary, alone — or, for that matter, to Joseph, alone. It matters that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us in a commonality we recognize; not as a lofty king, but as a boy in a family, with a mom and a dad. Would he have bothered, if it didn’t matter?

It’s worth pondering.

Related: Dwelling in the possibilities of a “win-win”

Link: 

Mother, 21, Beats Cancer after refusing to Abort! Yay! Marriage? Meh.

Read More

Poll: 77% of Americans support ban on sex-selective abortion

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Among women, support for a law making sex-selection abortion illegal is higher (80-13 percent) than it is among men.

WASHINGTON, DC, May 17, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A new public opinion poll released today by the Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) finds that strong majorities of American adults of both sexes, in every region of the country, and irrespective of age or race, favor enactment of legislation to make sex-selection abortions illegal.
 
The CLI poll of 1,016 U.S. adults found that, overall, 77 percent of respondents answered “yes” when asked, “When the fact that the developing baby is a girl is the sole reason for seeking an abortion, do you believe that abortion should be illegal?”  Only 16 percent of all respondents said that abortion should be legal in this circumstance.
 
Among women, support for a law making sex-selection abortion illegal is higher (80-13 percent) than it is among men, who favor such a law by a margin of 74-18 percent.  Support for a protective law is found among all age groups, but is highest among those age 45-54 where a ban is supported 87-11 percent.  By region, support for a ban ranges from a high of 81 percent in the Midwest and South to 68 percent in the West.
 
A fact sheet on sex-selective abortion including the poll results is available online
here.
 
“The issue has received renewed attention because of accounts of the life of Chen Guangcheng, who has highlighted forced abortion and sterilization under the one-child policy of the People’s Republic of China,” said Chuck Donovan, president of the Charlotte Lozier Institute. “Americans seem comfortable with the idea that the deliberate abortion of girls is a form of unacceptable sex discrimination.”
 
The poll was conducted as part of an omnibus survey by the polling company, inc./Womantrend.  The survey was conducted from May 10-13, 2013 and has a margin of error of ±3.1 percent.
 
Sex-selection abortions are procedures that some parents procure when they find that the child they are expecting is not of the particular sex they desire.  The practice of sex selection abortion, almost always carried out against females, has been a growing concern to a spectrum of human rights bodies worldwide.  Estimates of the number of “missing girls” as a result of sex selection procedures, including abortion, range as high as 163,000,000.

Visit source - 

Poll: 77% of Americans support ban on sex-selective abortion

Read More
« Older posts
  • What did I miss ???

  • sample
  • Tweets by @CatholiCanada
  • sample
  • CC Pages

    • About
    • Contact
    • Favourite Sites
    • MASS TIMES
    • Only Here
  • CC Archives

  • CC Tag Cloud

    Abp Prendergast Ang. Ordinariate Asia AUTHORS Brian Lilley Catholic Schools Crisis Magazine Culture Deb. Gyapong Eastern Rites Elizabeth Scalia Family Life Franciscans Fr Longenecker Fr Tim Finigan Fr Z Hamilton Home School John Laws John Pacheco JPSonnen LAITY - UK Life Issues LifeSiteNews Meditations MEN - USA Other Men Other Priests Other Women Other Youth PRIESTS - UK RISU Rorate Coeli Sacred Liturgy Salt+Light Seraphic Sun News The Chant Café Toronto Tradition Vancouver Vatican News Vocations WOMEN - USA z-Uncategorized
  • CC Posts by Date

    May 2012
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr   Jun »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • sample
  • facebook twitter youtube
  • sample
  • CC Current Posts

    • Bishop of Aleppo: Concern over fate of two Syrian archbishops kidnapped one month ago
    • On Rita’s Day, The Pope’s Tribute
    • Unusual Water Lily
    • Wednesday Choral Evensong: New College, Oxford
    • Dewey: Stalin’s Propagandist, the World’s Teacher
    • The rejection of ethics and God and its effects on the economy – Pope Francis
    • Whit Embertide- The Traditional Summer Ember Days.
    • War and Life Afterwards: An Interview with Brian Castner
    • A new Catholic “whistle-blower” group
    • CMS students win major scholarships
    • The Campaign continues
    • Fraser Valley student union restricts pro-life activity on campus
    • VIDEO: Jesus vs Muhammed by Steven Crowder
    • Groups claim ‘scientific’ basis for backing SSM
    • The most special time of year
    • Miraculous journalism
    • Campaign Life: 35 years of pro-life activism
    • Ed Peters on the suicide at Notre-Dame de Paris
    • CD 271: The priest, sin and saying Mass
    • St. Thomas More, pray for us.
    • Reading List
    • KAICIID dialogue centre holding conference series on "The Image of the Other"
    • Pope Francis: Call to prayer for the Church in China
    • QUOTATION: Saints and Sinners
    • Vatican’s Financial Information Authority releases Annual Report
    • Crises in the Middle East: Canadian Church leaders write to the Prime Minister
    • Pope at Mass: Culture of encounter is the foundation of peace
    • GENERAL AUDIENCE: BE COURAGEOUS WITNESSES OF THE GOSPEL
    • THAT CHINESE CATHOLICS MAY HAVE NO FEAR TO SPEAK OF JESUS
    • First annual report of the Vatican Financial Information Authority
    • POPE VISITS MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY, REAFFIRMS VALUE OF SOLIDARITY
    • POPE’S TELEGRAM FOR OKLAHOMA CATASTROPHE
    • Writers-on-Wednesday: Susan May Warren
    • Isn’t It Romantic? (No, Actually, It’s Not…)
    • Pope Francis visits Vatican soup kitchen
    • Audience: the Holy Spirit, unity and communion [Full text]
    • "Home Sweet Home" By: C.C.
    • The Teenager’s Job
    • Hidden Devotions: Mother Thrice Admirable
    • Good luck with that, kids.
    • Chair of Toronto Catholic School Board Tries to Usurp Trustees Authority
    • The Happiness Project: Let God Surprise You
    • The Ultimate Ballfield
    • Assessing Vatican II: A Response to My Critics
    • Bitter Old Men
    • What Father Among You: Bishops, Priests, and The Judas Crisis
    • Ordinariate priest fisks KJS
    • GASP! FRANCIS WAGES WAR WITH THE DEVIL IN PUBLIC!!!!
    • Graduates: Look to the Holy Family
    • You Shoulda Been There
  • Share Article with Others

    • 1 2
  • sample
  • CC Random Posts

    • It’s talk like Shakespeare Day

    • Thumbnail

      The Way of Beauty

    • Five Things I Loved About Being Homeschooled

    • KELLOGG’S DEFENDS HATE SPEECH

    • Image m_patronsaint_sm.jpg

      WDTPRS POLL: Do you pray the Rosary and add the “Fatima Prayer”?

© 2013 Catholic Canada. All Rights Reserved.
Developed by HyperDo Media | Catholic Web Design