Daily Archives: May 1, 2012

Give Online to Pro-Life

LifeCanada, a national pro-life organization in Canada, needs your help. I have been asked to post an appeal here. They have no money and need your help. This is URGENT.

Dear Friends of Love and Truth:

A few weeks ago a woman telephoned our
office to say that she was newly pregnant, alone, and considering
abortion. By the time the conversation ended, she was thanking God
for her options, and eager to hear more about adoption.

Lives are being saved. Hearts and
minds are being educated. This is the work of LifeCanada.

Everything we do to educate is making a
difference, whether it is our national conference, our polling, our
pamphlets, our journal or simply our force of presence on the Hill.
Often in the eyes of the world the difference we make is small and
imperceptible, but we rejoice in the fruits of our life-saving work.

Mahatma Gandhi, an enormously effective
politician and the personification of the Indian resistance, was once
asked how so humble a man could rally a third of a billion of the
most downtrodden people on earth to bring the mighty British empire
to its knees in the subcontinent. His answer was simple: “By love
and truth,” he said with a smile, “In the long run, no force can
prevail against them.”

Combined with the increasing weight of
the scientific data indisputably confirming the humanity of the
unborn, we see victory on the horizon, but we are not there yet. For
many of us, to deny that abortion is murder is to deny that the earth
is round or that blood circulates. But there is still much work to
be done in the area of education.

Please assist our work with your donation. With your
help, we will continue to work toward a culture in which, by law and
public resolve, every human life is protected, respected and valued
from conception until natural death. We cannot do this without you.

Spring is here! And you can partner
with us to water and nurture your investment. We will be faithful as
we look after the bulbs we have planted together. We know that bulbs
do not look anything like flowers, but when planted with care,
watered and looked after, at the right time in the shine of spring,
these bulbs blossom into the most perfect flowers. The soil is
ready. We are fast at work to preserve, protect and promote the
inexpressible divinity of existence, human life.

Please be generous and help us by making a safe, on-line donation today:

www.lifecanada.org

.

Thank you!

Natalie

Executive Director

LifeCanada

Excerpt from:

Give Online to Pro-Life

What I Wore to My Wedding

Absolute Mommy is celebrating her seventh wedding anniversary today and hosting a walk down memory lane (with a linky!) for the occasion. I’m two years behind her (anniversary

next month!

), but I thought it would be fun to participate and share a few memories myself…

I actually found my wedding dress

when I was in high school

. It has lacy sleeves with a V point over my hand and a row of
buttons under my wrist, cowl neckline with a trail that fell down my
back, matching veil. A friend of ours from church did my flowers and I’ve known my hairdresser since I was in elementary school.

My husband’s wedding outfit cost four times as much as my dress. My mom and I found my satin and lace on sale, and she sewed it (as well as my bridesmaids’ dresses and her dress). She didn’t want to sew my husband’s kilt, so we had to buy that. And no, we’re not Scottish (though both my grandfathers have Scottish blood and one of my husband’s distant relatives came from Scotland); we just thought it would be cool.

That’s our first dance, which shows off my whole dress and my shoes. I spent an entire afternoon with

my best friend at West Edmonton Mall

, trying to find flat white shoes. I’m an inch shorter than my husband and I was going to be wearing those shoes all day, so I wanted them to be comfortable. Do you know how hard it is to find flat white shoes? I hit EVERY store in WEM. I finally ended up paying about double for the shoes that I wanted to, but by the time I found them, I knew they were the ONLY shoes that fit and were flat.

On another note… I actually wore the dress before my wedding. My mom made my high school graduation dress from the same pattern, five years before my wedding. So I knew that the dress fit and I really liked it. I even wore my grad dress for my husband on one fancy date, and knew from his reaction that he’d like my wedding dress. Here’s me with my best friend (who was my maid of honour) at our grad.

Visit link:

What I Wore to My Wedding

Anti gay-bullying leader defends Bible slurs, has history of insults

The extreme remarks aren’t the first for Savage, whose “It Gets Better Project” promoting acceptance of homosexuality in schools has won the support of President Obama, top Hollywood celebrities and leading Canadian Conservative gov’t members.

May 1, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Dan Savage, leader of the “It Gets Better Project” against gay bullying in schools, has defended portions of a speech in which he was caught on video castigating the Bible and calling Christians in the audience “pansy-assed.” The columnist backed off the latter but defended calling the Bible “fulls*** [full of sh**],” saying the statements were “spun” as an attack on Christianity.

In a video recently published online, Savage is seen at a Seattle young journalist conference deriding the teachings of the Bible on sexuality as “bulls***” and harassing teens who left the room in protest. “It’s funny to someone who is on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansy-assed people react when you push back,” he said.

A teacher present at the event told CNN that Savage’s speech “took a real dark, hostile turn,” and was received by the audience as “a very pointed, direct attack on one particular group of students.” “It’s amazing that we go to an anti-bullying speech and one group of students is picked on in particular, with harsh, profane language,” said Rick Tuttle, who teaches at California’s Sutter Union High School.

Savage declined to comment on the story when it first broke before apologizing for the name-calling on Sunday – yet not without getting in another dig at Christian ethics, likening the insult to one of its basic tenets.

“I wasn’t calling the handful of students who left pansies … just the walk-out itself,” he wrote. “But that’s a distinction without a difference-kinda like when religious conservatives tells their gay friends that they ‘love the sinner, hate the sin.’”

The sex advice columnist defended his remarks against the Bible, saying the attack was only directed against Christians who do not accept other “bulls***” in the Bible on such topics as slavery, but continue to defend normative heterosexuality.

The extreme remarks aren’t the first for Savage, whose “It Gets Better Project” promoting acceptance of homosexuality in schools has won the support of President Obama and endorsement from several top Hollywood celebrities.

After one conservative leader complained that her son viewed a TV ad from Savage’s campaign in primetime, Savage hit back, saying he hoped the boy would learn “that the adult world isn’t entirely populated by hateful s***s like his mother.” http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/top-gay-rights-leader-kids-of-religious-families-are-target-demographic-of/

In 2000, Savage raised eyebrows after he described licking the doorknobs of GOP presidential candidate Gary Bauer’s staff in hopes of spreading the flu virus.

Last year, Savage joked that TV pundit Bill Maher’s comparison of congressional Republicans to late Palestinian ruler Yasser Arafat wasn’t exact enough. “Unfortunately they’re not exactly like him, I wish they were all f***ing dead,” said Savage, who later apologized for the remark.

Canadian homosexual personalities Deb Pearce, Rick Mercer, Rex Harrington, Ann-Marie MacDonald, Enza Anderson, Diane Flacks, Brad Fraser, Mark Tewksbury, George Smitherman, Peter Fallico and Laurie Lynd have also appeared in a Savage It Gets Better video. Another one included Conservative members of parliament John Baird, Vic Toews, Lois Brown, Alice Wong, Mike Wallace, Rona Ambrose, Shelly Glover, Deepak Obhrai, Candice Hoeppner and David Sweet and Conservative Senator Don Meredith

More here: 

Anti gay-bullying leader defends Bible slurs, has history of insults

Ben L’Oncle

Courtesy of Buster, who is studying for finals and can’t wait to get out of school so he can write and perform music like this. Rhythm and blues and funky horns have always been where his heart is at. All that big, lithe, Mozart-ready baritone going to waste, because deep down he needs to howl. Ah, well. This stuff has spoken to him since he was five.

I must say, I like it, too!

YouTube Preview Image

Source:  

Ben L’Oncle

Summa good finds at the used n’ rare

Live is Worth Living

by Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen is a classic that in spite of being very ‘period’ is somehow timeless.

The Inner Life is the first three sections or books from The Imitation of Christ published by Penguin in a lovely slim volume with a full quotation of the opening lines embossed on the cover.
I own another, older English edition of Thomas à Kempis’s The Imitation of Christ but this edition comes with introductory notes and an updated translation.

The niftiest find though may turn out to be a first edition print of the Cofraternity of the Precious Blood’s 1952 My Way of Life which is an abbreviated rendering and updated translation of the massive work by St. Thomas Aquinas, the Summa Theologica.

This tiny (90mm X 1350mm) green volume comes with a semi-hardback flexible cover that exceeds the page width just enough to protect from damage and even has a green ribbon for marking your place. At 4 bucks it’s probably an increase of 1000% on the original price of 50 years ago but it’s also 50% off the very cheap glued paperback version available today.It appears as though it was never read. A shame but, that will change now.

The hair cut couldn’t hurt.

I’ll leave you with a little Aquinas as translated by Martin J. Healy S.T.D. that made perfect reading yesterday as it was Good Shepherd Sunday when new priests are made in diocese around the world:

HOLY ORDERS IS A SACRAMENT, a sacred sign of a holy thing. The sacred sign consists of the imposition of the bishop’s hands on the head of the man to be ordained, and the words which the bishop pronounces in conjunction with the imposition of hands. The imposition of hands is the matter of the sacrament, and the words pronounced by the bishop are its form.

HOLY ORDERS gives the priest an increase of sanctifying grace. He is to communicate grace to others. He must be filled with grace himself. The sacrament also gives the priest the sacramental character of orders, an indelible spiritual power in his soul which gives him a share in the priesthood of Christ. This character gives the priest the power to offer the sacrifice of the Mass and to administer the sacraments to the people. The reception of the sacrament of holy orders also gives the priest a title to all the graces he will need to carry out his priestly functions worthily. If we recall the many priestly tasks which the pries must perform in his lifetime, it will be seen that this sacrament brings to the priest a veritable torrent of graces for his own sanctification and the sanctification of the world.

–p 570.

Read article here: 

Summa good finds at the used n’ rare

Sarkozy loss in French Presidential election would lead to dramatically leftward social changes

Rapid advancement of social leftist goals such as same-sex marriage, greater access and full funding of abortion, legalized euthanasia, religious persecution, and much more would likely occur with a leftist win.

PARIS, France, May 1, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The French presidential election next Sunday could result is a dramatic political realignment of French political control to the left. Rapid advancement of social leftist goals such as same-sex marriage, greater access and full funding of abortion, legalized euthanasia, suppression of parental rights regarding education of their children and religious persecution would likely occur with a leftist win.

The election designates the country’s president for the next five years. The second round will oppose Nicolas Sarkozy, the incumbent head of State, runner-up – with 27.18% of the vote – to socialist candidate François Hollande in the first round. Hollande was 1.5 points ahead, with 28.63% of the vote.

While a large proportion of France’s laws and regulations are now made in Brussels in the name of the European Union – and interfere with practically everything, from the size of septic tanks for houses located in the countryside, to immigration and asylum policies or changes to value added tax – societal affairs such as abortion, euthanasia, schooling and marriage law remain largely within the competence of the member States. As do labor legislation, fiscal law, family policy and other domains to which pro-life and pro-family electors are sensitive.

The result of next Sunday’s vote is still quite open, given the uncertainty on the transfer of votes from electors who favored one of the other eight candidates in the first round.

On the left, Jean-Luc Mélenchon – 11.1% in the first round, with a largely communist and revolutionary rhetoric – has openly called on his electors to vote for François Hollande and although he is not officially asking for anything in exchange, the sheer weight of his first-round result is expected to induce Hollande into radicalizing his left-wing stance if he is elected.

Mélenchon is a self-proclaimed admirer of Robespierre who personally organized and watched over the genocide of the “Vendéens”, catholic peasants in the West of France who rose up in arms to defend persecuted priests, their local rights and the traditional political order during the French Revolution and its secularist dictatorship.

Mélenchon is not so far removed from Hollande himself who has promised to inscribe the law of separation of State and Church of 1905 into the French Constitution, should he be elected to the presidency. The beginning of the XXth century in France saw the exile of religious orders, the confiscation of church buildings and assets, the tracking of Catholic officers in the French army and other restrictions on religious liberty which declined in the common effort of World War I. Enshrining the largely unapplied law of 1905 in the Constitution is seen by many as a declaration of open hostility to Catholic and Christian rights, in the name of securalism.

Apart from heavy taxation, massive State spending and extended rights for the non-European immigrant population – including voting rights for those immigrants in local elections and political overtures to the Muslim population – François Hollande’s program contains many unacceptable promises from the pro-life viewpoint.

He has promised the legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia, albeit in guarded tones. The French senate can be expected to vote for such a measure since the socialists gained a majority there last September. The National Assembly is expected to follow suit in the legislative elections next June if François Hollande wins on Sunday.

All of these potential developments would create a dramatically dangerous new political situation for France since, until now, the Senate acted as a brake on leftwing policies even under socialist presidents with a majority in the National Assembly.

François Hollande has also promised to make abortion more widely available and to create abortion centers in all State hospitals. 80% of abortion costs are paid for by the State budget; he has promised to drive up that figure to 100%. He wants to make contraception free and anonymous for minors. He has promised to legalize embryo research, homosexual “marriage” and homosexual adoption.

Hollande also wants to make schooling compulsory at three years of age (against the currently age six) and has committed himself to reducing State funding of Catholic schools and reversing legislation that allows parents to choose a State school outside their particular territory.

Attempts by socialist representatives to put an end to tax deductions for donators to independent school funds (a growing number of schools which receive no public subsidy whatsoever) are expected to be implemented and, under socialist governance, to succeed.

Fearing such threatening, radical developments, pro-life and Christian voters are expected to pronounce themselves “against” Hollande next Sunday with a “Sarkozy” vote, even though the incumbent president is far from an ideal candidate from their point of view.

Sarkozy has sent out signs of sympathy to the homosexual lobby during his campaign, promising to transform the current civil union contract (“PACS”) into a more marriage-like commitment to be concluded in the townhouse. But – under growing pressure from the conservative population – he has promised not to legalize homosexual “marriage” and has spoken out clearly against same-sex parenting and adoption. He has also committed himself against euthanasia, promising not to modify the largely acceptable “End of Life” act voted into law in 2005, which includes some room for “euthanasia by omission” in allowing withdrawal of feeding tubes (but not of hydration).

Sarkozy, a liberal, is not expected to thwart freedom of education in France more than it already is.

The “Sarkozy vote” is being promoted by Catholic groups and the small but active conservative press as the lesser of two evils, or even the lesser of two “worses”, experience having shown that under Sarkozy’s first period of office the right to life and the stability of natural marriage neither progressed nor receded.

What has changed, though, is the increased pressure from traditional values forces on Sarkozy who cannot hope to be re-elected without a massive transfer of votes from the electors of Marine Le Pen of the Front national.

Le Pen’s unprecedented score of 17.9% on April 22nd has spurred Sarkozy to speak about patriotism, the French identity, family values, national frontiers and other themes which he already brought to the fore during his campaign to try to limit Marine Le Pen’s vote. During his major rally at the Trocadéro in Paris today, Sarkozy even proclaimed the “Christian identity of France” – receiving wild applause.

Marine Le Pen is the only candidate who has promised more support for French families and stay-at-home parents, a partial stop to public funding of abortions – although she does claim to favor the “right to abortion” – and to move out of the European Union which promotes and imposes hate-crime laws, anti-discrimination laws and a homosexualist agenda which heavily influence French law-making.

Pro-lifers and promoters of traditional values have had no real champion during these presidential elections, but on the positive side some of their themes have gained public visibility and recognition.

See original - 

Sarkozy loss in French Presidential election would lead to dramatically leftward social changes

Vatican to the UN: all parents have the right to homeschool

The Holy See’s observer says parents “have the right and duty to choose schools inclusive of homeschooling.”

TURTLE BAY, NEW YORK, May 1, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – In a significant victory for parental rights worldwide, a Vatican representative said all parents have the right to homeschool their children.

“The State should respect the choices that parents make for their children and avoid attempts at ideological indoctrination,” the permanent observer mission of the Holy See to the United Nations wrote in a statement released last Tuesday.

Parents “have the right and duty to choose schools inclusive of homeschooling, and they must possess the freedom to do so, which in turn, must be respected and facilitated by the State.”

“That’s huge,” said Jeremiah Lorrig, director of media relations at the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), told LifeSiteNews.com. “Having the support of the Vatican ambassador would invaluable to the homeschool movement.”

A growing number of parents opt to educate their children at home because of the poor quality of schools available, or because schools increasingly promote values that conflict with traditional Christian morality.

Last July, Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill requiring California public schools to teach “the role and contributions of” homosexuals in American history.

“The purpose of this program is very obvious and that is to promote social acceptance of homosexuality, transsexuality to all children, and at the same time to silence those who have religious or moral beliefs against such lifestyles,” Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, told LifeSiteNews.com.

The problem did not begin with any one bill, he said. “California school districts already were implementing pro-homosexual orientation programs, also cross-dresser/transvestite sensitivity programs, before S.B. 48 was even drafted as legislation, much less become law,” Dacus said. For example, Redwood Heights Elementary School in Oakland implemented a “gender identity” curriculum. “These programs were already being implemented from high school all the way down to kindergarten or preschoolers,” he said.

“This kind of material only makes it more confusing and more to make decisions as well as solidifying a sexual orientation different than what is mentally and physically healthy for a child,” Dacus told LifeSiteNews.

In many nations, parents are denied the basic right to choose their children’s education. Last October, a committee of the Brailian Congress decreed that homeschooling “disrespects the Constitution, the Penal Code, the National Education Guidelines and Basic Law and the Child and Adolescent Statute.” The state of homeschooling in Germany is so bad a family fled to Iran for the right to homeschool their children.

“Raising awareness is key,” Lorrig told LifeSiteNews. “In a lot of these countries that have very restrictive laws against homseschooling, people are losing their children.”

The problem exists in the United States, as well, he said. Pacific Justice Institute and HSLDA defended California homeschoolers from a California Supreme Court ruling that sought to restrict their rights.

Lorrig told LifeSiteNews the greatest problem is uncertainty. “You never know where the brushfires are going to break out,” he said. For instance, HSLDA had to battle a Mississippi judge, who tried to impose greater restrictions on homeschooling parents. “There’s never homeschool problems in Mississippi,” Lorrig said.

HSLDA won those cases. “But it’s a constant tug-of-war between homeschool liberty and the desire to control parents,” Lorrig said.

The support of the Vatican will make a welcome change to HSLDA’s international outreach. “We actually find ourselves battling the UN, especially with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,” said Lorrig.

Ratifying the treaty, he warned, could erode parental rights over education and many other aspects of their minors’ lives. “Constitutionally speaking, it would completely change the structure of family policy in the United States, undermine sovereignty, and put that authority in the hands of remote, self-described experts,” Lorrig said.

HSLDA facilitates or advises legal work on behalf of homeschoolers in about 25 nations around the world.

More here: 

Vatican to the UN: all parents have the right to homeschool

This Sunday: Fifth Sunday of Easter (Year B)

Thumbnail

This Sunday’s Readings

This weeks readings from the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, which uses the New American Bible.

(Acts 10:25-26, 34-35, 44-48; Psalm 98; 1 John 4:7-10; John 15:9-17)

Click here for THIS SUNDAY’S  readings

The Word on Fire

The Word On Fire – Fr. Robert Barron’s internet site offers many interesting insights into all things Catholic. Fr. Barron has a full library of homilies that he has prepared and we will be featuring a link here to his 15 minute reflections on this week’s readings.

This Sunday: “The image of the vine and the branches indicates that our relationship with Christ is greater than that of merely a teacher to his students. Instead, we are related to him on all levels of our existence because Christ is the eternal Logos through whom all things are made. . …”

Click here to listen to Fr. Barron’s Homily for This Sunday

Fr. Scott Lewis

Fr. Scott Lewis is associate professor of New Testament at Regis College in Toronto.  Each week Fr. Lewis writes a short reflection on the upcoming readings in the Catholic Register.

This Sunday: “There is never a dull moment when the Holy Spirit is involved. The Spirit was probably the most exhilarating and disconcerting experience of the first generation of Christians. It has a mind of its own and cares little for our prejudices, opinions, preferences or theologies. That is probably why we try to keep it under lock and key. The Spirit had already shocked Peter and his companions by commanding them to eat foods without distinction — nothing that God created was to be called unclean.”

Click Here to read the rest of Fr. Lewis’ reflection for THIS SUNDAY

Fr. Greg Friedman

Sunday Soundbites is a weekly, 90-second radio homily based on the Sunday readings, written and read by Fr. Greg Friedman, O.F.M. Sunday Soundbites is also heard on Catholic radio stations around the country.

This Sunday: Imagine yourself in the early Jerusalem Christian community, gathered for Sunday Eucharist—and in walks Saul, well-known for his persecution of the Church. What would your reaction be?  “

Click here to listen to This Sunday’s Soundbite.

The ChurchYear.Net site is a resource that provides short and highly readable information on the Church Liturgical Year.

Click here to read more about Easter (Pascha), Easter Sunday, and Easter Season

FacebookLinkedInShare

Link: 

This Sunday: Fifth Sunday of Easter (Year B)

The renewal of “Caritas Internationalis”

Thumbnail

2012-05-02 L’Osservatore Romano

The Pope's Audience with the participants of the 19th General Assembly of “Caritas Internationalis” (27 May 2011)

With the General Decree approved by the Pope and signed by the Secretary of
State, the juridical framework of “Caritas Internationalis” has been renewed. In
essence the Holy See, gathering the experience of this worthy institution and in
particular the developments of recent years, has sought to update its juridical
status in order to support its activity better.

Read more:

The renewal of “Caritas Internationalis”

God never tires of reaching out to man

2012-05-02 L’Osservatore Romano

God never tires of reaching out to man; even if he often encounters an
attitude of misunderstanding and diffidence, if not “obstinate opposition”, as
the Holy Father said at the General Audience of Wednesday, 2 May, in St Peter’s
Square.

He was speaking of the witness and prayer of St Stephen, one of the seven
deacons chosen by the Apostles to carry out the service of charity to the needy.

Referring to the discourse that the first Christian Martyr addressed to the
Sanhedrin, the Pope stressed that he “reinterprets the whole of the biblical
narrative, the itinerary contained in Sacred Scripture, to show that it leads to
the ‘place’ of the definitive presence of God, which is Jesus Christ, and in
particular his Passion, death and Resurrection”. Stephen also interprets in this
perspective his being as a disciple of Jesus, even to the point of choosing
martyrdom, which thus becomes “the fulfilment of his life and his message”.

In the Protomartyr’s opinion therefore, “the new temple in which God dwells
is his Son, who has put on human flesh, is the humanity of Christ, the Risen One
who gathers his people and unites them in the sacrament of his Body and his
Blood”. In him “God and man, God and the world are really in contact”. In fact
Jesus “takes upon himself the whole burden of human sin to bring it into the
love of God and to ‘consummate it’ in this love”.

Drawing close to the Cross thus means “entering this transformation” as
Stephen himself did, becoming by his martyrdom “one with Christ”. His witness
shows believers that it was in his relationship with God himself that the Saint
“found the strength to confront his persecutors, even to the point of giving
himself”. Our prayers too – the Holy Father recommended in this regard – “must
be nourished by listening to the word of God, in communion with Jesus and with
his Church”.

Among the vicissitudes of Stephen, the vision of the relationship of love
between God and man, in which the figure and mission of Jesus is foretold,
stands out in particular. Where is the temple”, Benedict XVI pointed out, “in
which the presence of God the Father became so close that it entered our human
flesh to bring us to God, to open the gates of heaven to us?”. Consequently our
prayers “must be a contemplation of Jesus at God’s right hand, of Jesus as the
Lord of our, of my, daily life”. For in him alone “can we too address God, make
real contact with God with the trust and abandonment of children speaking to a
Father who loves them infinitely”.

Read article here - 

God never tires of reaching out to man

New decree strengthening ties between Holy See and Caritas Internationalis

Thumbnail

2012-05-02 Vatican Radio

The Holy See’s Secretariat of State has issued a new General Decree clarifying and strengthening the ties between the Vatican and Caritas Internationalis, the confederation of the world’s national Caritas agencies.

In its 61 years of existence, Caritas Internationalis has always been a privileged instrument of the Church’s charitable activity. In recent years, the Holy See has sought to update the juridical status of the organization, in order the better to support its activity in the context of the modern world.

In the General Decree published on Wednesday, the Secretariat of State has clarified the role of the principal Vatican departments involved with Caritas, most importantly the Pontifical Council Cor Unum.

“The Pontifical Council promotes the identity and ecclesial spirit within the Confederation,” said Cardinal Robert Sarah, the President of the Council Cor Unum. “In particular, it must ensure that the activities of its members -coordinated internationally – are carried out in collaboration and in communion with the local Churches, including with the involvement of their pastors.”

The Decree establishes that at least three members of the Executive Board be papal appointments, to underline the close bond between Caritas Internationalis and the Holy Father. It also defines the Federation’s relationship with the different sections of the Secretariat of State itself.

Cardinal Sarah told Vatican Radio said the new norms will not change the fundamental mission of Caritas.

“Caritas will continue to be an instrument of the Church at the service of the Ministry of Charity, “ he said. “This is important, because Caritas is an organization known and appreciated around the world.”

Listen:

Link: 

New decree strengthening ties between Holy See and Caritas Internationalis

Ireland: Card. Seán Brady responds to BBC ‘This World’ Programme

Thumbnail

2012-05-02 Vatican Radio

Responding to the BBC ‘This World’ programme entitled ‘The Shame of the Catholic Church’, broadcast on 1 May 2012, Cardinal Seán Brady [Archbishop of Armagh Ireland] has issued the following statement:

On Tuesday 1 May 2012, the BBC ‘This World’ series broadcast a programme entitled ‘The Shame of the Catholic Church’ on the BBC Northern Ireland network. In the course of the programme a number of claims were made which overstate and seriously misrepresent my role in a Church Inquiry in 1975 into allegations against the Norbertine priest Fr Brendan Smyth.

In response to the programme I wish to draw attention to the following:

Six weeks before broadcast (15 March 2012) I drew the attention of the programme makers to a number of important facts related to the 1975 Church inquiry into Brendan Smyth, which the programme failed to report and which I now wish to restate for all other media who report on this matter:

    To suggest, as the programme does, that I led the investigation of the 1975 Church Inquiry into allegations against Brendan Smyth is seriously misleading and untrue. I was asked by my then Bishop (Bishop Francis McKiernan of the Diocese of Kilmore) to assist others who were more senior to me in this Inquiry process on a one-off basis only;
    The documentation of the interview with Brendan Boland, signed in his presence, clearly identifies me as the ‘notary’ or ‘note taker’. Any suggestion that I was other than a ‘notary’ in the process of recording evidence from Mr Boland, is false and misleading;
    I did not formulate the questions asked in the Inquiry process. I did not put these questions to Mr Boland. I simply recorded the answers that he gave;
    Acting promptly and with the specific purpose of corroborating the evidence provided by Mr Boland, thereby strengthening the case against Brendan Smyth, I subsequently interviewed one of the children identified by Mr Boland who lived in my home diocese of Kilmore. That I conducted this interview on my own is already on the public record. This provided prompt corroboration of the evidence given by Mr Boland;
    In 1975 no State or Church guidelines existed in the Republic of Ireland to assist those responding to an allegation of abuse against a minor. No training was given to priests, teachers, police officers or others who worked regularly with children about how to respond appropriately should such allegations be made;
    Even according to the State guidelines in place in the Republic of Ireland today, the person who first receives and records the details of an allegation of child abuse in an organisation that works with children is not the person who has responsibility within that organisation for reporting the matter to the civil authorities. This responsibility belongs to the ‘Designated person’ appointed by the organisation and trained to assume that role. In 1975, I would not have been the ‘Designated Person’ according to today’s guidelines. As the Children First State guidelines explain (3.3.1):‘Every organisation, both public and private, that is providing services for children or that is in regular direct contact with children should (i) Identify a designated liaison person to act as a liaison with outside agencies and a resource person to any staff member or volunteer who has child protection concerns.(ii) The designated liaison person is responsible for ensuring that the standard reporting procedure is followed, so that suspected cases of child neglect or abuse are referred promptly to the designated person in the HSE Children and Family Services or in the event of an emergency and the unavailability of the HSE, to An Garda Síochána.’;
    The commentary in the programme and much of the coverage of my role in this Inquiry gives the impression that I was the only person who knew of the allegations against Brendan Smyth at that time and that because of the office I hold in the Church today I somehow had the power to stop Brendan Smyth in 1975. I had absolutely no authority over Brendan Smyth. Even my Bishop had limited authority over him. The only people who had authority within the Church to stop Brendan Smyth from having contact with children were his Abbot in the Monastery in Kilnacrott and his Religious Superiors in the Norbertine Order. As Monsignor Charles Scicluna, Promoter of Justice at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith confirmed in an interview with RTÉ this morning, it was Brendan Smyth’s superiors in the Norbertine Order who bear primary responsibility for failing to take the appropriate action when presented with the weight of evidence I had faithfully recorded and that Bishop McKiernan subsequently presented to them;
    The following statement from Monsignor Scicluna had been made to the BBC programme makers six weeks in advance of its broadcast but was not acknowledged by them in any way: ‘It is clear to me that in 1975 Fr Brady, now Cardinal Brady, acted promptly and with determination to ensure the allegations being made by the children were believed and acted upon by his superiors. His actions were fully consistent with his duties under canon law. But the power to act effectively to remove Brendan Smyth from priestly ministry lay exclusively with the Abbot of Holy Trinity Abbey in Kilnacrott and his superiors in the Norbertine Order. This is where the sincere efforts of Bishop McKiernan and others like Fr Brady to prevent Brendan Smyth from perpetrating further harm were frustrated, with tragic consequences for the lives of so many children. I know that in his role as President of the Irish Bishops’ Conference, Cardinal Brady has worked tirelessly with his fellow bishops to ensure such a situation could never occur again and that the civil authorities in Ireland are now promptly informed of allegations of abuse against children. We have all learned from the tragic experience of the Church in Ireland but also from the sincere efforts of so many lay faithful, religious, priests and bishops to make the Church in Ireland an example of best practice in safeguarding children.’;
    In fact, I was shocked, appalled and outraged when I first discovered in the mid 1990’s that Brendan Smyth had gone on to abuse others. I assumed and trusted that when Bishop McKiernan brought the evidence to the Abbot of Kilnacrott that the Abbot would then have dealt decisively with Brendan Smyth and prevented him from abusing others. With others, I feel betrayed that those who had the authority in the Church to stop Brendan Smyth failed to act on the evidence I gave them. However, I also accept that I was part of an unhelpful culture of deference and silence in society, and the Church, which thankfully is now a thing of the past;
    As to other children named in the evidence recorded during the Inquiry process, I had no further involvement in the Inquiry process once I handed over the evidence taken. I trusted that those with the authority to act in relation to Brendan Smyth would treat the evidence seriously and respond appropriately. I had no such authority to act and even by today’s guidance from the State I was not the person who had the role of bringing the allegations received to the attention of the civil authorities. I was also acutely aware that I had no authority in Church law in relation to Brendan Smyth or any other aspect of the Inquiry process;
    Today, Church policy in Ireland is to report allegations of abuse to the civil authorities. It recognises the Gardai and HSE as those with responsibility for investigating such allegations and that any Church investigation should not take place until the investigation by the civil authorities has been completed. I have fully supported this policy and have worked with my fellow Bishops and the leaders of Religious Congregations to put this policy in place;
    The programme made reference to a statement I made in the course of an RTE interview in which I suggested that if my failure to act on an allegation of abuse against a child led to further children being abused, that I would then consider resigning from my position. The programme failed to point out, however, that I gave this answer in response to a question specifically about someone in a position of ‘Management’, someone who was already a Bishop or Religious Superior with ultimate responsibility for managing a priest against whom an allegation has been made. In 1975, I was not a Bishop. I was not in that role. It was misleading of the BBC programme to apply my response to the RTE interview on a completely different situation to my role in the 1975 Inquiry.

It is my view that the ‘This World’ programme has set out to deliberately exaggerate and misrepresent my role in these events. The programme suggested that no response to their questions had been provided before the programme was completed, whereas in fact a comprehensive response had been provided to the programme six weeks in advance and only days after the ‘door-stepping’ interview with me in Limerick.

I deeply regret that those with the authority and responsibility to deal appropriately with Brendan Smyth failed to do so, with tragic and painful consequences for those children he so cruelly abused. I also deeply regret that no guidelines from the State or the Church were available to guide the sincere and serious effort made to respond to the allegations made by the two boys interviewed in the Inquiry process. With many others who worked regularly with children in 1975, I regret that our understanding of the full impact of abuse on the lives of children as well as the pathology and on-going risk posed by a determined paedophile was so inadequate. It is important to acknowledge that today both the Church and the State have proper and robust procedures in place to respond to allegations of abuse against children. I fully support these new procedures which include the obligation to report such allegations promptly to the civil authorities. I have worked with others in the Church to put these new procedures in place and I look forward to continuing that vital work in the years ahead.

View article: 

Ireland: Card. Seán Brady responds to BBC ‘This World’ Programme

Pontifical Academy for Social Sciences presents conclusions of Plenary

Thumbnail

2012-05-02 Vatican Radio

The Pontifical Academy for Social Sciences presented the conclusions of their XVIII Plenary Session on Wednesday at the Press Office of the Holy See. Below, please find the full text of the Academy’s Press Release detailing the work of the Plenary.

Click the following link for our audio report

:

****************************************************
PRESS RELEASE
2 May 2012

On the eve of the fiftieth anniversary of the publication of the Encyclical Pacem in Terris we have chosen to devote a session of our Academy to the study of the contribution of this major document to the social doctrine of the Church. Published between the first and second sessions of the Second Vatican Council, the encyclical of Blessed John XXIII falls within the framework of the renewal of the Church’s social thinking which that Council aimed at promoting, in particular in its constitution Gaudium et spes, on the Church and the world.
At the time the topic of peace was extremely relevant, as it still is. In 1963, in the midst of the Cold War and in a severe international crisis, the encyclical was addressed to “all men of good will”, sending a powerful message of hope above all ideological and religious divisions. The voice of the Church rose on the ground of our common humanity, appealing to the consciences of all human beings in the name of their common nature. Humanity was invited to rethink its structures of economic, political and cultural collaboration on the basis of the universal principles of “freedom, truth, love and justice” (cf. PT 35).
In the wake of the great encyclicals of Leo XIII and Pius XI, a few years after the encyclical Mater et Magistra, Pacem in Terris was a breath of fresh air for the social doctrine of the Church. In truth, the reason why the encyclical was so favourably received by all milieus, especially within international institutions, was because it touched men so deeply. It was a social encyclical in the fullest sense of the term, an in-depth reflection on man in society, the centre and summit of every social institution.
The encyclical reaffirms very strongly the central thesis of the entire social doctrine of the Church, which is that “each individual man is truly a person. His is a nature, that is endowed with intelligence and free will” (PT 9). This is the basis on which the whole social doctrine of the Church is built. The human being mirrors his Creator. Human nature is nothing but the humanity of man, created in the image of God, capable of knowing and loving.
The challenges that men face, be they peace or a just order in economic exchanges, are always of an ethical nature. Pacem in terris well says that “Ordo autem, qui in hominum consortione viget, totus incorporali est natura” (PT 37).
Fifty years after this great encyclical, the international panorama is no longer that of the Cold War, but of a globalised world and a financial and economic crisis affecting many countries. Peace is also in danger where nationalism and religious and racial hatred expose entire societies to violent conflict.
We remark that the encyclical strongly emphasized that the common good – that is to say, “all those social conditions which favour the full development of human personality” (PT 58) – takes on a universal dimension (PT 132). Today this is truer than ever. The further the common good extends, the further it should progress in understanding. The common good cannot but be determined in relation to man, since “it is intimately bound up with human nature” (PT 55). It is not possible to identify the common good without reference to what human beings claim on behalf of their very humanity. Man in society is made to live in peace with his neighbours, in justice, truth, love and freedom.
The Catholic Church, for her part, is aware that through the revelation of Christ she knows the truth about man and is therefore duty bound to stand up for the values that are valid for human beings as such, transversally of the various cultures. She makes a distinction between the specificity of her faith and the truths of reason that often derive from faith and which are also accessible to the person as a person regardless of this faith. As Pacem in Terris recognized, a fundamental defense of all the universal human values became positive rules in the declarations on human rights after the Second World War, because, after the errors and horrors of the two World Wars, enlightened people of different areas and cultures recognized their universal validity that is based on their anthropological truths and expressed them in effective rights. Today, the fundamental values of the human being, in which human dignity as such is questioned, are once again being debated. Here, over and above her faith, the Church considers it her duty to defend in our society as a whole the truths and values in which the very dignity of man is at stake.
The demand for truth is probably the most argued over today, while the reference to natural law is ignored in many sectors of society. I hope that our work can help our contemporaries to rediscover the truth of the human being and of the common good, which are the cornerstones of all life in society. In a way, the contribution of the social sciences especially in this Year of the Faith, must be to help the Church find new and perennial truths in the current social context. They should serve as an aid or as preambles of the social doctrine of the Church, of theology and even of faith, to make easy for our contemporaries the path from reason to faith and from faith to reason, as indicated in Fides et ratio. St Thomas Aquinas, who was ahead of his times with his clear distinction and complementarily between faith and reason, wrote that “theology – although all other sciences are related to it in the order of generation, as serving it and as preambles to it – can make use of the principles of all the others, even if they are posterior to it in dignity” (Super Boetium de Trin., q. 2, a. 3 ad 7). Our statutes say that the Academy “offers the Church the elements which she can use in the development of her social doctrine” (art. 1): thus, the Academy tries to collaborate with the Church’s new evangelization programme with a critical sense of research, and a love of truth of sciences and of faith.
Among the questions examined by the members of the Academy were:
• What the “kingdom of God” proclaimed by Jesus means for peace in the world today, with special reference to the Holy Father’s book on Jesus of Nazareth by H.E. Msgr Ladaria.
• The importance of living in truth and the new possibility, offered by the communications revolution, to be more transparent.
• The question of global governance in light of both Pacem in Terris and Caritas in Veritate, addressed in particular by H.Em. Cardinal Marx
• Economic globalization and patterns of migration as both causes of friction and possible avenues of cooperation.
• Ecological dimensions of the global order.
• Human rights and democratization, with special attention to the phenomenon of the Arab Spring and the emergence of global economic prowess on the part of China, India and the Pacific.
• New information technology as an instrument of peace, including a paper by Jimmy Wales, the creator of Wikipedia.
• The functioning and regulation of financial markets after the economic crisis, with the special contribution of Academicians Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz and Dr Hans Tietmeyer, former President of the Deutsche Bundesbank. H.E. Msgr Toso also explained the meaning of the recent document of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Towards Reforming the International and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority (http://bit.ly/ADcGcN).
• The challenges of achieving a workable union among European nations, and its global implications.
• The contribution of religion to the search for peace.
Please write to the Academy (pass@pass.va) if you are interested in receiving the individual papers and visit our website www.pass.va for the Proceedings of this and of our past meetings.

From: 

Pontifical Academy for Social Sciences presents conclusions of Plenary

Audience: Prayer and the strength to face persecution

Thumbnail

2012-05-02 Vatican Radio

Prayerful meditation on Sacred Scripture in communion with Jesus and his Church can help us face all of life’s difficulties and even persecution, just like St Stephen, the first Christian martyr. Continuing his series of lessons on prayer in the Acts of the Apostles, Pope Benedict XVI focused his Wednesday audience catechesis on Acts Chapter 6, Stephens discourse before the Sanhedrin, delivered before his death.

Forty thousand people thronged St Peter’s Square, and speaking to English pilgrims the Pope noted: “Stephen’s words are clearly grounded in a prayerful re-reading of the Christ event in the light of God’s word”.

In comments in Italian, Pope Benedict recalled how Stephen was “one of the seven chosen for the service of charity”. Accused of saying that Jesus would destroy the Temple and the customs handed down by Moses, Stephen responds by presenting Jesus as the Righteous One proclaimed by the prophets, in whom God has become present to humanity in a unique and definitive way”.

“Stephen’s discourse before the court, the longest of the Acts of the Apostles develops from this prophecy of Jesus, who is the new temple, who inaugurates the new cult and replaces the ancient sacrifices with the offering of himself on Cross. Stephen wants to show how unfounded the accusation made against him of having subverted the law of Moses and illustrates his vision of the history of salvation, the covenant between God and man. He thus re-reads the biblical narrative, the itinerary contained in the Holy Scripture, to show that it leads to the “place” the ultimate presence of God, which is Jesus Christ, especially His Passion, Death and Resurrection. In this perspective, Stephen also reads his being a disciple of Jesus, following him to martyrdom. “

Stephen’s meditation on Sacred Scripture helps him understand his present reality. “In his speech Stephen begins with the call of Abraham, a pilgrim to the land indicated by God and which was only a promise; he then passes to Joseph sold by his brothers, but assisted and freed by God, to arrive at Moses, who becomes an instrument of God to free his people, but who also on several occasions encounters the rejection of his own people. In these events narrated in Sacred Scripture, which Stephen religiously listens to, God, who never tires of encountering man despite often finding stubborn opposition, always emerges. “

“In all this he sees a foreshadowing of the story of Jesus, the Son of God made flesh, who – like the ancient Fathers – encounters obstacles, rejection, death.” In his meditation on the action of God in salvation history, Stephen highlights the perennial temptation to reject God and his action and says that “Jesus is the Righteous One announced by the prophets; in Jesus, God himself is present in such a unique and definitive way: Jesus is the true place of worship. “

Stephen does not deny the importance of the temple, “but stresses that God does not dwell in houses made by human hands. The new temple in which God dwells is his Son, who took on human flesh, it is the humanity of Christ, the Risen One who gathers the people and unites them in the Sacrament of his Body and his Blood. “

“The life and discourse of Stephen is suddenly interrupted by his stoning, but his very martyrdom is the fulfillment of his life and his message: he becomes one with Christ.” Before he died, he asks for Jesus to receive his spirit, and like Jesus asks God “not to hold this sin” against those who stoned him.
St. Stephen drew the strength to face his persecutors to the point of the gift of himself “from his relationship with God” and “meditation on the history of salvation, from seeing the action of God, which in Jesus Christ came to the summit. ” So “our prayer must be nourished by listening to the Word of God.”

He also “sees foreshadowed, in the history of the relationship of love between God and man, the figure and mission of Jesus He – the Son of God – is a temple” not made with human hands ” where the presence of God the Father came so close as to take on our flesh to bring us to God, to open up the gates of Heaven to us. Our prayer, then, must be the contemplation of Jesus at the right hand of God, of Jesus as Lord of our, of my daily, existence. In him, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, we too can turn to God with the trust and abandonment of children who turn to a Father who loves them infinitely “.

Pope Benedict concluded: “As the Son of God made man, Jesus is himself the true temple of God in the world; by his death for our sins and his rising to new life, he has now become the definitive “place” where true worship is offered to God. Stephen’s witness to Christ, nourished by prayer, culminates in his martyrdom. By his intercession and example may we learn daily to unite prayer, contemplation of Christ and reflection on God’s word. In this way we will appreciate more deeply God’s saving plan, and make Christ truly the Lord of our lives”.

“I greet all the English-speaking pilgrims and visitors present at today’s Audience, including those from England, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, Nigeria, Australia, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Canada and the United States. I offer a cordial welcome to the delegation from the Christian Council of Norway and to the ecumenical groups from Sweden. I also thank the traditional choir from Indonesia for their song. Upon you and your families I cordially invoke God’s abundant blessings”.

Original article: 

Audience: Prayer and the strength to face persecution

Catholic News RoundUp (May 1, 2012)

Thumbnail

View post: 

Catholic News RoundUp (May 1, 2012)

UGCC To Build Replica of Virgin Mary’s House in Zarvanytsia

2 May 2012, 00:24

|

UGCC

|

|

|

Code for Blog

|

|

Archbishop Metropolitan Vasylii (Semeniuk) of the Ternopil and Zboriv of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church has called the faithful to contribute by prayer and donation to reproduction of a replica of the house in which the Virgin Mary lived in Nazareth. In his pastoral letter to the faithful, he noted that the house where Archangel Gabriel told the Virgin Mary about the birth of the Son of God is now kept in Loretto, Italy. So reported the web site of the Ternopil-Zboriv Eparchy of UGCC.

“Later, in Europe, a tradition was established to build replicas of the Nazareth house of the Holy Virgin. Therefore, we aspire to build such a shrine in the Ukrainian land, in the wonder-working place of Zarvanytsia. The project envisages original size and appearance of the building.

I encourage all of you, dear brothers and sisters in Christ to show special respect, gratitude and filial love for our Heavenly Mediatress by contributing to the construction of the house for the Holy Mother of God in prayer and donation. I hope that the shrine will be a place of Her special guardianship over Christ’s Church and the whole Ukrainian nation. And the Mother of God will repay us all a hundred times,” stressed the metropolitan.

Система Orphus

Source article:

UGCC To Build Replica of Virgin Mary’s House in Zarvanytsia

STM Knights lance Carney Stars

2012 Catholic Cup for Senior Girls Soccer featured familiar ending

Eight teams came in but there could be only one champion. Led by Samantha Dresher’s most valuable player performance, the Saint Thomas More Knights won the 2012 Catholic Cup by a 3-nil score on the road at Archbishop Carney. STM also defeated Carney last year in the final.

For the home-side Stars, this marks the fourth consecutive year they’ve made the final without walking away with a championship.

Other individual player awards: Kassia Hayek was awarded the Golden Boot for her goal-scoring prowess and Moral Desormeaux back-stopped her way to Top Goaltender.

Original source:  

STM Knights lance Carney Stars

Pray For My Bishop!

Thumbnail

See original - 

Pray For My Bishop!

Successful Personhood USA Supreme Court Appeal could overturn 1992 Casey decision

The Oklahoma State Supreme Court has moved to deny a ballot access initiative for Personhood; US Supreme Court appeal could result in overturning of 1992 Planned Parenthood vs. Casey decision that upheld “right” to abortion.

WASHINGTON, May 1, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Oklahoma State Supreme Court has moved to deny Oklahoma citizens a ballot access initiative for Personhood.

Personhood USA stated in a release today that “On April 30, repeatedly citing Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Oklahoma State Supreme Court denied Personhood Oklahoma’s right to petition, ruling the ballot measure ‘unconstitutional.’”

Calling the courts decision “a rare move against the people of Oklahoma”, the pro-life organization charges, “the State Supreme Court ruled against the ballot initiative before it went to a vote, denying the people’s right to vote on the issue and the circulator’s right to petition the government.”

Citing the Casey decision, Personhood USA states, “Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion brings weight to the State’s right to allow the people to decide the permissibility of abortion:

“The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting.” Justice Scalia, Planned Parenthood vs. Casey.”

“Planned Parenthood v. Casey and Roe v. Wade, according to Justice Scalia’s opinion, have no basis in law. Because of this, the undue burden of the standard of Casey is completely unworkable,” explained Gualberto GarciaJones, Personhood USA legal analyst. “With such a vague standard and any variety of interpretations, it is impossible for citizens to understand it and apply it. Justice Scalia said citizens can resolve the issue of abortion by persuading one another and voting. If Oklahoma citizens are denied the opportunity to do so, our only recourse is to petition the Supreme Court.”

Steve Crampton, Vice President for Legal Affairs and General Counsel for Liberty Counsel, who represents Personhood Oklahoma, said: “This ruling epitomizes judicial overreaching. It not only misinterprets and misapplies federal constitutional law, but it also denies states’ rights and strips Oklahomans of their right to petition for a substantive change in state law, which is guaranteed under the state constitution. We are hopeful that the United States Supreme Court will reverse this decision.”

While five U.S. Supreme Court Justices are required for a favorable ruling, only four are required to approve a petition for certiorari.

Personhood Oklahoma had been collecting signatures for the Personhood Amendment for two months. The amendment reads, “A ‘person’ as referred to in Article 2, Section 2 of this Constitution shall be defined as any human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being to natural death. The inherent rights of such person shall not be denied without due process of law and no person as defined herein shall be denied equal protection under the law due to age, place of residence or medical condition.”

“The people of Oklahoma will not be silenced,” explained Dan Skerbitz, Director of Personhood Oklahoma. “We have 13,000 volunteers who have been circulating petitions and are ready and willing to continue this fight for human lives. We are more determined than ever to rise up against judicial tyranny and cowardly State Representatives who do not represent the will of the people of Oklahoma.”

Read original article: 

Successful Personhood USA Supreme Court Appeal could overturn 1992 Casey decision

Successful Personhood USA Supreme Court Appeal could overturn huge 1992 Casey decision

The Oklahoma State Supreme Court has moved to deny a ballot access initiative for Personhood; US Supreme Court appeal could result in overturning of 1992 Planned Parenthood vs. Casey decision that upheld “right” to abortion.

WASHINGTON, May 1, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Oklahoma State Supreme Court has moved to deny Oklahoma citizens a ballot access initiative for Personhood.

Personhood USA stated in a release today that “On April 30, repeatedly citing Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Oklahoma State Supreme Court denied Personhood Oklahoma’s right to petition, ruling the ballot measure ‘unconstitutional.’”

Calling the courts decision “a rare move against the people of Oklahoma”, the pro-life organization charges, “the State Supreme Court ruled against the ballot initiative before it went to a vote, denying the people’s right to vote on the issue and the circulator’s right to petition the government.”

Citing the Casey decision, Personhood USA states, “Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion brings weight to the State’s right to allow the people to decide the permissibility of abortion:

“The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting.” Justice Scalia, Planned Parenthood vs. Casey.”

“Planned Parenthood v. Casey and Roe v. Wade, according to Justice Scalia’s opinion, have no basis in law. Because of this, the undue burden of the standard of Casey is completely unworkable,” explained Gualberto GarciaJones, Personhood USA legal analyst. “With such a vague standard and any variety of interpretations, it is impossible for citizens to understand it and apply it. Justice Scalia said citizens can resolve the issue of abortion by persuading one another and voting. If Oklahoma citizens are denied the opportunity to do so, our only recourse is to petition the Supreme Court.”

Steve Crampton, Vice President for Legal Affairs and General Counsel for Liberty Counsel, who represents Personhood Oklahoma, said: “This ruling epitomizes judicial overreaching. It not only misinterprets and misapplies federal constitutional law, but it also denies states’ rights and strips Oklahomans of their right to petition for a substantive change in state law, which is guaranteed under the state constitution. We are hopeful that the United States Supreme Court will reverse this decision.”

While five U.S. Supreme Court Justices are required for a favorable ruling, only four are required to approve a petition for certiorari.

Personhood Oklahoma had been collecting signatures for the Personhood Amendment for two months. The amendment reads, “A ‘person’ as referred to in Article 2, Section 2 of this Constitution shall be defined as any human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being to natural death. The inherent rights of such person shall not be denied without due process of law and no person as defined herein shall be denied equal protection under the law due to age, place of residence or medical condition.”

“The people of Oklahoma will not be silenced,” explained Dan Skerbitz, Director of Personhood Oklahoma. “We have 13,000 volunteers who have been circulating petitions and are ready and willing to continue this fight for human lives. We are more determined than ever to rise up against judicial tyranny and cowardly State Representatives who do not represent the will of the people of Oklahoma.”

Credit: 

Successful Personhood USA Supreme Court Appeal could overturn huge 1992 Casey decision