Daily Archives: April 29, 2012

First US Catholic President with Pope

Thumbnail

Continue at source: 

First US Catholic President with Pope

John Paul II: marking his beatification a year on …

Thumbnail

2012-04-30 Vatican Radio

To mark a year since the beatification of John Paul II on May 1st 2011, we bring you his words in English focusing on prayer and priestly life, as well as the testimony of some of those who witnessed this first-hand.

Among them, the late Carmelite Father, Redemptus Valabek, former postulator of the causes of the saints of his Order, who explains why many used to describe John Paul II as being a Carmelite at heart. Also, Nigerian Cardinal, Francis Arinze, head of the Pontifical Council for Inter-religious dialogue at the time of the remarkable prayer gathering in Assisi.He points to how this Polish Pontiff’s call for all to pray was addressed not just to Christians but to non-Christians as well.

In this programme in which you can hear Blessed John Paul II reciting the ‘Our Father’, we also highlight how this Pope’s ‘s prayer life was inseparable from his priestly vocation. How he often told his friends: “I am first and foremost a priest”, reminding them how privileged he was to have this vocation because it allowed him to preside at the Church’s most important prayer of all: the Celebration of the Eucharist .

Listen to this programme presented and produced by Veronica Scarisbrick:

Link: 

John Paul II: marking his beatification a year on …

Pacem in Terris 1963 – 2012

Thumbnail

2012-04-30 Vatican Radio

Pope John XXXII’s encylical ‘Pacem in Terris ‘ was published on April 11th 1963.

Fifty years on from April 27th to May 1st , the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences has chosen this encyclical as focus for its Plenary Assembly .The exact title being : “The Global Quest of Tranquillitas Ordinis, Pacem in Terris , Fifty years on “.
Among the speakers was Professor Russel Hittinger of the Department of Philosophy and Religion of the University of Tulsa in the United States.

We asked him whether during these days of intense discussions a new scenario regarding this encyclical had emerged .

Professor Hittinger began by pointing to Pope John XXIII’s specific request regarding the drafting of ‘Pacem in Terris’ so that it be in line with Saint Augustine’s ‘tranquilllitas ordinis’ or tranquillity of order, explaining by this the title of the conference. “

Among the areas of the world discussed in a special way during the Plenary Assembly was Europe because of the long term history of the nations of this continent attempting to find some kind of adequate order.

But also the emerging nations in South East Asia, considered as developing nations fifty years ago whereas they are perhaps the chief economic players in our world today.

Another aspect which was the focus of discussions was the emergence of global communications which Professor Hittinger described as appearing to : ” …be changing almost every kind of order we’re familiar with .. It’s changing the order of scientific resaerch , communications between people in different countries, it’s intimitaley bound up with political revolution. This is new so we’re having to try to understand it …”…

Professor Hittinger also mentions how quite a bit of time was spent discussing education ouside the context of national boundaries because with the breaking down of these boundaries thanks to the role of internet: “.. nobody is quite sure what this means and where the opportuniities are…”

Also up for discussion during the Assembly in a special way our Professor says, was the role of religion in our world today as an agent of peace and tranquillity in an attempt to find out what religions can do to foster:”£ … this complex kind of multi- layered peace that people seem to want…”

Listen :

Read the article: 

Pacem in Terris 1963 – 2012

Christians still under attack in Africa

Thumbnail

2012-04-30 L’Osservatore Romano

Abuja, 30.

The persecutions of Christians is never ending and Africa – the land where
the sign of hope and openness which with their presence Christians themselves
succeed in giving – has once again been the scene of violence. And perhaps as
some people have noted, it is precisely their natural vocation to dialogue that
attracts the ferocious hatred of those who, in comparison, perceive this hope
and openness as a threat.

Rescuing a wounded Christian in Kano  (La Presse/AP)

Two terrorist attacks in Nigeria and in Kenya reaped a toll of 21 dead and
dozens of injured, including various children. The most serious episode was in
the northern Nigerian city of Kano where a commando of terrorists opened fire in
the Bayero University. The assailants first threw several bombs near a compus
theatre used by the Christians for religious functions and they then opened fire
on the terrorized crowd that was seeking to flee. As yet no one has claimed
responsibility for the slaughter, but in the past Kano has also been the scene
of bloody attacks by the fundamentalists of Boko Haram, a terrorist group that
is aiming to establish Islamic law throughout Nigeria. The Boko Haram claimed
responsibility for the attacks during Christamas Mass in two Christian churches
in Jos and for the slaughter at the headquarters of theUnited Nations in Abjua,
in August 2011. At almost the same time a bomb was hurled  at a church in the
popular district of Ngara, Nairobi, in Kenya, just before the beginning of the
religious service. The explosion caused one death and injuries to dozens, some
of whom have been admitted to hospital in a serious condition.

From Rimini, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Secretary of State, said he was
deeply concerned about the repeated attacks. “We are living in increasing
intolerance, He emphasized, “an intolerance of Christians that is sometimes
cruel and we are worried, because Christians on the frontiers of the world, in
the trenches of the world, as has been noted in African countries and also in
the Middle East, are a factor of balance, of reconciliation and of unity and not
of conflict”. “It therefore seems strange”, the Cardinal added, “that there
should be a struggle of intolerance and such strong aggression against
Christians who make a contribution to reconciliation and peace, to justice and
to solidarity”.

 Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, President of the Italian Episcopal Conference,
continued on the same lines. “Religious persecution”, he said, “unfortunately
nothing new. It was hoped that it was something that had largely been overcome,
but in fact in certain parts of the world this is not the case”. “African
Christians, however”, he remarked, “are reacting to the persecutions with
strength and with no desire for revenge”. The Jesuit Federico Lombardi, Director
of the Holy See Press Office, described the attacks has horrible and despicable,
to be condemned with the greatest determination. And the European Union, through
a spokesperson, has expressed the hope that the authors of the massacre are
brought before justice as soon as possible.

Link: 

Christians still under attack in Africa

BENEDICT XVI’S PRAYER INTENTIONS FOR MAY

Vatican City, 30 April 2012 (VIS) – Pope Benedict’s general prayer intention for May is: “That initiatives which defend and uphold the role of the family may be promoted within society”.

His mission intention is: “That Mary, Queen of the World and Star of Evangelisation, may accompany all missionaries in proclaiming her Son Jesus”.

Source - 

BENEDICT XVI’S PRAYER INTENTIONS FOR MAY

INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON BLINDNESS

Thumbnail

Vatican City, 28 April 2012 (VIS) – The Pontifical Council for Health Pastoral Care has organised an international congress entitled: “The Blind. ‘My Teacher, let me see again!’” The event is due to be held on 4 and 5 May in the Pius X Hall on Via della Conciliazione in Rome, and will focus primarily on the theological-pastoral and medical-scientific aspects of treating blind and partially sighted persons.

Participants will include Cardinal Peter Kodwo Turkson, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, and Silvio Paolo Mariotti, head of the blindness and deafness prevention programme of the World Health Organisation. Also present will be Msgr. Roberto Brunelli, director of the diocesan museum of Mantua, Italy, who will illustrate the planning and realisation of a special room for blind people, and the results obtained. Two touch-perceptible versions of works from the museum will be on display at the congress.

More here: 

INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON BLINDNESS

Pope: Message to Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences

Thumbnail

2012-04-30 Vatican Radio

Pope Benedict XVI has sent a message to Professor Mary Ann Glendon, the President of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences to mark the Eighteenth Plenary Session of the Pontifical Academy, which is marking the fiftieth anniversary of Blessed John XXIII’s Encyclical Letter

Pacem in Terris

.

The Pope said “the vision offered by Pope John still has much to teach us as we struggle to face the new challenges for peace and justice in the post-Cold-War era.”

Pope Benedict said the notion of forgiveness needs to find its way into international discourse on conflict resolution.

“It is the combination of justice and forgiveness, of justice and grace, which lies at the heart of the divine response to human wrong-doing, at the heart, in other words, of the ‘divinely established order’”, he said. “Forgiveness is not a denial of wrong-doing, but a participation in the healing and transforming love of God which reconciles and restores.”

The full text of the Pope’s Message follows


To Her Excellency Professor Mary Ann Glendon
President of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences

I am pleased to greet you and all who have gathered in Rome for the Eighteenth Plenary Session of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. You have chosen to mark the fiftieth anniversary of Blessed John XXIII’s Encyclical Letter Pacem in Terris by studying the contribution of this important document to the Church’s social doctrine. At the height of the Cold War, when the world was still coming to terms with the threat posed by the existence and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, Pope John addressed what has been described as an “open letter to the world”. It was a heartfelt appeal from a great pastor, nearing the end of his life, for the cause of peace and justice to be vigorously promoted at every level of society, nationally and internationally. While the global political landscape has changed significantly in the intervening half-century, the vision offered by Pope John still has much to teach us as we struggle to face the new challenges for peace and justice in the post-Cold-War era, amid the continuing proliferation of armaments.
“The world will never be the dwelling-place of peace, till peace has found a home in the heart of each and every human person, till all preserve within themselves the order ordained by God to be preserved” (Pacem in Terris, 165). At the heart of the Church’s social doctrine is the anthropology which recognizes in the human creature the image of the Creator, endowed with intelligence and freedom, capable of knowing and loving. Peace and justice are fruits of the right order that is inscribed within creation itself, written on human hearts (cf. Rom 2:15) and therefore accessible to all people of good will, all “pilgrims of truth and of peace”. Pope John’s Encyclical was and is a powerful summons to engage in that creative dialogue between the Church and the world, between believers and non-believers, which the Second Vatican Council set out to promote. It offers a thoroughly Christian vision of man’s place in the cosmos, confident that in so doing it is holding out a message of hope to a world that is hungry for it, a message that can resonate with people of all beliefs and none, because its truth is accessible to all.
In that same spirit, after the terrorist attacks that shook the world in September 2001, Blessed John Paul II insisted that there can be “no peace without justice, no justice without forgiveness” (Message for the 2002 World Day of Peace). The notion of forgiveness needs to find its way into international discourse on conflict resolution, so as to transform the sterile language of mutual recrimination which leads nowhere. If the human creature is made in the image of God, a God of justice who is “rich in mercy” (Eph 2:4), then these qualities need to be reflected in the conduct of human affairs. It is the combination of justice and forgiveness, of justice and grace, which lies at the heart of the divine response to human wrong-doing (cf. Spe Salvi, 44), at the heart, in other words, of the “divinely established order” (Pacem in Terris, 1). Forgiveness is not a denial of wrong-doing, but a participation in the healing and transforming love of God which reconciles and restores.
How eloquent, then, was the choice of theme for the 2009 Special Assembly for Africa of the Synod of Bishops: “The Church in Africa at the Service of Reconciliation, Justice and Peace”. The life-giving message of the Gospel has brought hope to millions of Africans, helping them to rise above the sufferings inflicted on them by repressive regimes and fratricidal conflicts. Similarly, the 2010 Assembly on the Church in the Middle East highlighted the themes of communion and witness, the oneness of mind and soul that characterizes those who set out to follow the light of truth. Historic wrongs and injustices can only be overcome if men and women are inspired by a message of healing and hope, a message that offers a way forward, out of the impasse that so often locks people and nations into a vicious circle of violence. Since 1963, some of the conflicts that seemed insoluble at the time have passed into history. Let us take heart, then, as we struggle for peace and justice in the world today, confident that our common pursuit of the divinely established order, of a world where the dignity of every human person is accorded the respect that is due, can and will bear fruit.
I commend your deliberations to the maternal guidance of Our Lady, Queen of Peace. To you, to Bishop Sánchez Sorondo, and to all the participants in the XVIII Plenary Session, I gladly impart my Apostolic Blessing.

From the Vatican, 27 April 2012
Benedictus PP. XVI

From:

Pope: Message to Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences

Archbishop Kaigama: Nigeria attacks defy all reason

Thumbnail

2012-04-30 Vatican Radio

Twenty one people are being mourned in Nigeria today after they were killed by gunmen who attacked Christian religious services on Sunday in the north of the country. The co-ordinated assaults happened at a university campus, during the observance of a religious service, and a church.

“This horrific attack really defies all logic”, said the Archbishop of Jos and President of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria, Ignatius Kaigama, reacting to Sunday’s killings.

He told Lydia O’Kane that people are “in a state of shock” and are wondering when the violence will stop.

Archbishop Kaigama also added his Archdiocese has been touched by violence recently.

“My church was attacked, so many killed. A few weeks ago we had the one month’s mind of the death of 14 of our parishioners who died in that attack.”

No group has claimed responsibility for this latest violence, but the attacks bore similarities to others carried by a radical Islamist sect known as Boko Haram. Listen to Lydia O’Kane’s full interview with Archbishop Kaigama

Source: 

Archbishop Kaigama: Nigeria attacks defy all reason

Holy See condemns church attacks in Africa

Thumbnail

2012-04-30 Vatican Radio

The head of the Holy Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi, SJ, condemned Sunday’s church attacks in Nigeria and Kenya.

The first attack in Nigeria targeted a section of Bayero University’s campus in the city of Kano where churches hold Sunday services, with gunmen killing at least 16 people and wounding at least 22 others. Later, gunmen open fire at a Church of Christ chapel, killing five people.

The attacks are blamed on the Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram, which wants to introduce strict Sharia law in the country.

Meanwhile, Al-Qaida-linked al-Shabab militants from Somalia are blamed for a grenade attack on a church in Nairobi, Kenya. One person died and 15 people were wounded.

Father Lombardi called the terrorist attacks “horrific” and “dispicable”. He also called on the local population not to yield to the temptations of hate. He expressed the Holy See’s closeness to the communities suffering from what he called “hideous violence”, which they experience as they “peacefully celebrate a faith which proclaims love and peace for all.”

Listen:

View this article: 

Holy See condemns church attacks in Africa

Sunday Reads

Thumbnail

Link to original:

Sunday Reads

The First Modern Pope

Thumbnail

Continue at source: 

The First Modern Pope

More "Proper" Nuns…

I’ve written

very briefly

about the feminist-fruitcakes of the LCWR (I can’t bear to describe their antics, but Fr. Z has plenty of examples.)

The problem is that it’s the nutcases which attract attention. There are plenty of religious sisters who do wonderful work, and the ones who are faithful to the Church’s Magisterium tend to be the orders which are flourishing. They also tend to be the orders which don’t attract much in the way of media attention: “Nuns faithful to vows!” and “Sisters do good work for poor!” aren’t the most gripping of headlines…

But we do need to make sure that these “proper” nuns get their share of attention, especially when it comes to promoting their charitable work.


This evening after Mass we had a visit from a Sister of St. Elisabeth’s Convent, Belarus. The charitable works covered by this order of Orthodox Nuns are truly remarkable – they seem to help everyone from drug and alcohol addicts to orphans, from sufferers of mental disorders to ex-prisoners. As well as practical assistance, they offer spiritual support and prayer too.

If you want to support the work of the St. Elisabeth Convent, do have a look at their website and especially their online shop.

Read original article - 

More "Proper" Nuns…

Prepare to be amazed! The 2nd miracle of St. Gianna Molla

Thumbnail

I have posted this before, but it seemed appropriate to repost it today. St. Gianna is one of the saints of our time whom I would very much like to see included in an updated version of the traditional Roman calendar.

This is about the 2nd miracle through the intercession of St. Gianna, which lead to her canonization. A person who cause for canonization has been officially advanced is called a “Servant of God”. If they are determined to have died while living a life of “heroic virtue” they are declared “Venerable”. After that, if a miracle is authenticated by their intercession, they are beatified and called “Blessed”. After another miracle they are canonized and called “Saint”.

The account of the 2nd miracle for the canonization of St. Gianna gives me shivers. Sometimes we don’t get many details about what these miracles are all about. We know quite a bit about this miracle.

This is adapted from my original post when I was speaking and thinking mostly in Italian, so it might sound odd here and there.

Thus, my post from many years ago continues:

Since I have just recently finished over 100 hours of training at the Congregation for Causes of Saints concerning the history, theology and juridial dimensions of causes of beatification and canonization (investigating the life, heroic virtues, martyrdom, reputation of holiness, reputation of martyrdom, miracles, etc.), I figured I should put some of that training to use and occasionally produce some of it here with some comments that might be of use to others. After all, what training I get isn’t just for me:

it has to be for the whole Church or it is worth only the cost of the parchment.

We had the chance to learn from and question the officials of the Congregation, the experts who collaborate with it, and the physicians and historians who are experts consultants. We had lectures from the Prefect, Secretary and Under-Secretary, the Promotor of the Faith (so-called “Devil’s Advocate” is a misnomer, really) and the Relator General. We had tours of the archives and attended the proceedings of the opening of a cause in the Roman phase. Abundant materials were provided and we were, naturally, allowed then to be thoroughly tested on them.

Going into the course I was not sure what to expect, but I brought a certain measure of sceptism about some things I had heard (mostly due to faulty and insufficient information, I see now). I heard stories of lives and of miracles which left me nearly with my jaw on the table as I listened and saw the documentation.

This was a privilege which for the rest of my priesthood will affect how I can help other people understand things about the life of grace in a way I could not before.

Ad ramos

Concerning the second of the two miracles worked by God through St. Gianna:

In mid November 1999 a Brazilian woman named Elisabete Comparini Arcolino discovered she was pregnant for the fourth time. An echogram on 30 Nov. showed that the developing child was within a small sac only .8 cm in length and 2.3 cm in diameter. The doctor said that it was doubtful that with such a beginning for the gestation that child would come to term. On 9 December a echo showed the embryo a 1.0 cm in length but also a huge increase in coagulation of blood (blood loss), measuring 5.2 x 3.5 cm. On 19 December they found the beating heart of the child, but also a deterioration of the placenta in the lower region of the uterus. A pessimistic prognosis was given. The doctor following the case, Dr. Nadia Bicego Vieitez de Almeida, who had handled Elisabete’s previous pregnancies, said that with the great loss of blood Elisebete would probably spontaneously abort or they would have to do the procedure sooner or later.

Contrary to expectations, the child’s heart kept beating and the pregnancy continued.

On 11 February 2000 Elisabete realized there was a serious problem and went to the hospital. The echo showed that the gestational sack’s membrane had broken at 16 weeks of gestation and, while the fetus was alive, there was now a total absence of amniotic fluid. The radiologist testified that there was no amniotic liquid to protect the child from exposure to the outside world and from the external pressure of the uterus itself. This meant that both the child and mother were in serious danger of infection, etc. Dr. Bicego recommended termination of the pregnancy. Elisabete was put on a regime of super hydration, 4 l. of phleboclysis (intravenous injection of an isotonic solution of dextrose or other substances) per day. On 15 Feb a new echo showed that there was no significant increase in the volume of amniotic fluid and the volume was insufficient to bring the pregnancy to term.

At this point, 15 Feb, the prognosis for the child was precisely zero. Two studies, one in Sao Paolo and one in San Francisco had looked at viability of pregnancies with a ruptured membrane at between 22-26 weeks, many more weeks after the case of Elisabete and her child. In the studies in every case examined every fetus was spontaneously aborted within 60 days of the rupture. In virtually all cases, a fetus of 16 weeks would abort with a few days.

Dr. Bicega and other doctors told Elisabete that they had to do an abortion to save her life, and gave her some time to make the decision. But Elisabete, as she testified, knew in her heart thatshe could not do that and that she must try to bring the child to term. When the doctor came for the decision, Elisabete’s husband Carlos Cesar requested that a priest come. He called the parish priest of San Sebastiano, Fr. Ovidio Jose Alves di Andrade. Dr. Bicega said she would return again in 15 minutes with the documents for their signature approving the abortion.

Present at the time Dr. Bicega came was a friend of Elisabete, named Isabel, who heard the exchange about the abortion. Isabel went to the hospital chapel to pray to Mary to help bring some clarity to the situation. There Isabel spent some time in prayer. When she was finshed and got up to leave, she saw pass by the door the diocesan Bishop Diogenes Silva Matthes who had come to the hospital to visit another person. Bp. Silva had been celebrant of the wedding of Elisabete and Carlos Cesar at San Sebastiano where they worked as catechists. Isabel told the bishop what was going on and he went to Elisabete’s room and there learned the whole story. The bishop said, “Betinha, we will pray and God will help us” and he asked Dr. Bicega to wait a while longer. Then the bishop left.

Shortly after the bishop left Fr. Ovidio arrived. He began to give Elisabete the sacrament of anointing. At that point the bishop returned. He had brought with him a biography of Bl. Gianna Beretta Molla. He said to Elisabete: “Do what Blessed Gianna did, and, if necessary, give your life for the child. I was praying at home and I said to the Blessed in prayer, ‘Now has arrived the opportunity for you to be canonized. Intercede before the Lord for the grace of a miracle and save the life of this little child.”

Elisabete had known about Bl. Gianna and how she died and how the first miracle for her cause was for a woman who had terrible complications from a caesarian section. After knowing about Bl. Gianna, Elisabete herself, in her third pregnancy and after two previous caesarian sections, had decided to give birth normally despite the problems that entailed. At that time the same Bishop Silva had given her a holy card of Bl. Gianna. Elisabete was terribly afraid but she asked Bl. Gianna for help and gave birth to a child weighing over 5kg.

Therefore, this time, reinforced by past experience and the help of Bl. Gianna and the same bishop, Elisabete told Dr. Bicega she would try to carry the child to term, so long at the child’s heart continued to beat. Various doctors at the hospital expressed their opinion that this was madness. However, Dr. Bicega later testified about that time: “But I, I don’t know if it was by intuition, through my own lack of courage, or if I was drawn by Elisabete’s faith which seemed to have no limit, decided to wait and see what happened.” Elisabete would later testify that for her: “Jesus’ greatest miracle was to change the doctor’s heart. She had been unmovable in her determination to perform abortions, but one day she said to me, ‘Your faith had made me think a great deal. Even I have faith now and so let’s wait for the death of the fetus”.

Elisabete left the hospital and went to the home of Carlos Cesar’s aunt, Janete Arcolino, who was a nurse. Dr. Bicego lent them the sonar machine so that they could monitor the heart beat of the child and told them to check her temperature and blood pressure every six hours. They continued the super hydration treatments and eventually began a cortisone treatment to prevent problems with the child’s lungs.

In the meantime, Fr. Ovidio testified later, the whole community was continuing to invoke Bl. Gianna, continuously asking for a miracle. The parish had been very pro-life and every month there was special blessing for women who were with child. Also involved in the prayers to Bl. Gianna was a community of Carmelite sisters who in turn had communicated the request to other convents in Brazil. For her part, Elisabete had a very hard time of things. Despite her faith in God and her past experience, there were times when she was terribly afraid she was going to die with her child.She felt herself sometimes quite abandoned by God and alone. She was worried about what would happen with her other three children if she died.

Dr. Bicega followed the pregnancy closely and noted that during the whole time there was no accumulation of amniotic fluid. If Elisabete gained any, as soon as she would move to get up to go to the bathroom, she would again lose it all.

When they had reached the 32nd week and when the baby weighed 1.80k, they decided for a caesarian section delivery, effected on 31 May 2000. The newborn daughter, Gianna, was in good shape with the exception of the left foot which was twisted, probably because of compression with the uterus.

The problems did not cease there. They found that Elisabete had a wound within a uterine muscle to which the placenta had adhered, thus remaining in place. She had a serious hemorrhage and her lungs collapsed and wound up in intensive care for three days. As part of her treatment Dr. Bicega wanted to interdict her cycle with a kind of false menopause, which would result also in Elisabete not being able to lactate, but Elisabete said she did want to do that.

The newborn was sent home on 17 June weighing 1.960kg. Later a surgical operation and therapy corrected the twisted foot. In July 2001 a pediatrician Dr. Maria Engracia Ribeiro examined the child completely and found her to be perfectly normal and healthy, intelligent and lively, with the strong personality. Another check on 17 January 2002 found no problems in any of the child’s development, with no immune or respiratory problems and was, for her age, in perfect health.

The case of the asserted miracle was studied by the “Consulta Medica” of the Congregation for Causes of Saints on 10 April 2003 who determined that despite the severe prognosis for the fetus and the mother as the result of the total loss of amniotic fluid at the 16th week, and despite medical treatment inadequate for such a grave situation, the positive outcome of the pregnancy and health of mother and child were unexplainable in medical terms. The decree super miraculo was promulgated by the Congregation in the presence of Pope John Paul II on 20 December 2003. Since Gianna Beretta Molla had been beatified on 24 April 1994, her canonization was celebrated on 16 May 2004.

I would put to you several points to consider, any of which might serve as a starting point for comments below:

  1. Saints are presented to us by Holy Mother Church for “the two I’s”: imitation and intercession.
  2. As all Christians are called to imitate Christ, we also must experience self-emptying and the Cross, abandonment to providence and self-donation. We must be willing to lose everything.
  3. We are not alone: the Church Militant and the Church Triumphant are closely knit, interwoven in charity. We on earth must intercede for each other and believe and ask for the intercession of the saints.
  4. God makes use of the weak to demonstrate His might and love.
  5. If we do not believe in miracles, we do not ask for them. If we do not ask for them, they will not be granted.
  6. Our life of faith is noticed by non-believers and they are not unaffected.
  7. What a difference a bishop can make.
  8. How often do you invoke the help of the saints and holy angels?
  9. God’s ways are not our ways.
  10. No one is too small to be an occasion of grace for others.

Visit site: 

Prepare to be amazed! The 2nd miracle of St. Gianna Molla

Study in America Magazine: Why People Leave the Catholic Church and What They Want

Hello All.

Still need to get myself to hunker down and change the posting on the SSPX part II. Unfortunately it won’t be until a bit later this week. I just finished 4 straight days of shifts and 3 of them are night shift (booooo!!!) and I got only a brief respite till tommorow’s night shift. Those just kill me and I sleep in for 5-6 hours immediately after the following day. I might as well conisder the whole day lost.

Anyways I was scouring the blogs I usually read last week, and I found this link from a friend of mine on another Catholic blog (sorry, can’t reveal the blog else it’s obvious who I am. I don’t think he knows I blog under a pseudoname, but I want to keep it that way):

http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=13347

This article has a bishop who did a study in his American diocese in Trenton, New Jersey, from fallen away parishoners. Hopefully he asked a lot more people than the Jersey Shore Snookis and Situations out there. lol! ok it was a corny Jersey Shore joke. Then again, maybe it would be interesting to ask each of them about their collapsed faith lives. We do know Snooki a.k.a. Nicole Polizzi was an altar server as in a Youtube Video on her personal channel, she said she “used to hold the candles and the book for the priest.”

But I digress. While reading the article above, I couldn’t help but read the articles featured reasons as to why they fall away from a few direct statements in the survey. There were many more items to break apart in the 2nd half of the article with regard to what people want in the Church, but I chose to focus this post on the first 1/2 with reasons why those people left the church, and my commentary in blue text. As always, this is from the viewpoint of a young adult, Roman Catholic, male layperson in Canada who received a private Catholic high school education (more truer to Magisteriam Teaching) and has been a Catholic revert for 2.5 years now.

Reason 1: The Church hierarchy is corrupt and evil!

“…. One respondent wrote: “I separated my family from the Catholic Church and turned to an alternate religion for a while and then returned knowing I had the right religion but the wrong people running it.” Several chose to specify that they separated themselves from “the hierarchy….”

Alright, here we have a case of “I left the Church cause the idiots running the show are corrupt.” First let’s get the rough stuff out of the way. Yes, the instiutional Church has screwed up, as you have seen some occasions here on YCRCMB. What I meant by the institutional church is: the liberal or weakly-catechized teachers of Catholic schools, the numerous lax or liberal priests, the religious brothers and sisters (Fr. Z. will sometimes refer to the sisters and the “Magisterium of Nuns”), your parents, etc. Many people in the wake of the “Spirit of”/misapplication of Vatican II” took all sorts of liberties with their positions in power. Furthermore, yes we’ve seen priests in financial and even sexual scandal or bishops who have failed to uphold even Canon Law. Disgraced and likely lacized Raymond Lahey is the most recent example to mind here in Canada. So sorry if you sadly got one of these priests, teachers, or even your parents, who failed to teach you the authentic true tenets of the Catholic Faith.

Now, does this mean that the whole Church is bad???? No. As a whole, Christ in Matthew 16:18 vowed to Peter when he infomred him he would have His teaching authority (knowing he would die on the Cross), that “the gates of Hell shall not prevail against [the Church] when it comes to providing us the means of spirtual salvation. Further when we look at the individuals in the Church in positions of power, when they screw up or are corrupt all the way to the Popes themselves (e.g. the Medici line of popes), the Church will still be there for us and theologically and spiritually remain intact till His Second Coming (a.k.a. the end of all existence). If it has survived corruption before, it will continue to survive, and be the spiritual link to our salvation despite what happens in its physical walls and organization.

In addition, all throughout our salvation history including the Old Testament, God (and Jesus once the Word Made Flesh existed) used ordinary, sinful men, to carry out God’s love and desire for our selves to unify us with him. In the OT, think of for example, king David, whom was one of the most, if not the greatest, king(s) of Israel of all time. He sent poor Uriah to die in battle to claim his wife for himself (Uh David? hello? I think there is a commandment of those big 10 about coveting your neighbour’s goods???). Once a prophet came and chided him did he finally realize “Oh no!!!!”. Yes even this great king was flawed. And look at the Apostles themselves. They were all sinners, heck Matthew was even a reviled tax collector, and they were the big 12 who carried out Christ’s authority and began what is the awesome Catholic Church. Also don’t forget, of those sinful apostles, two of the four Gospels were written by a member each, including that reviled tax collector.

Reason 2a, b, c: Female roles, Peer involvement, and Spiritual Mentorship

” One 23-year-old woman said: I felt deceived and undervalued by the church. I didn’t understand certain things and found no mentors within the church. I just stopped going because my community of friends and family were no longer in the church …

2A, “DEPRECIATION OF WOMAN”: Man, this is a much larger kettle of fish when you deal with the Church and feminism. I won’t tackle the ideaology in depth, other than to say that thanks to 2nd wave radical feminism, it has misled both sexes (incl. men in supporting this) to believe in more than just human rights and true equality for women, including misandry (man-hating) and a passion to rule the world and punish all men or those who won’t go along with their agenda. Now this woman is by no means shown to be a radical feminist, or a feminist at all for that matter, but I have to adress her deception and undervaluing. I also am sorry for this young woman, that with the liberal wave of the “Spirit of Vatican II” came a lie in the form of women infiltrating every crevice of the Church and taking over it like a rebellion, and the poor examples of conduct shown by her role models of both sexes. Maybe even being told of things like womynpriests and even a woman pope.That was not the truth and you should have not been even led to believe such a thing. Blame our stupid higher ups and the “Magisterium of [pantsuit] Nuns” for that one, and us laity for just going along with that.

I will say, however, that the Church does have many positive roles for women. One of the better fruits of Vatican II was the opening of liturgical “ministries” once held by minor orders to the Laity. This young woman, and yourselves too any female readers, can actively get involved in the Liturgy. Because of an indult (indults are supposed to be “special priviledges” not the norm in the Church) that got widespread to a point, Pope John Paul II had to be prudent and for the sake of civility, he made altar serving available to women in Churches and dioceses that allow it (some bishop’s don’t or pastors in their parishes don’t and the bishop OKs this.) So one could be a female altar server. There are other lay ministries in the Mass, like extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist, and lectors that PROCLAIM the Word of God. Also there are female sacristans, directors of religious education/catechists, and even pastoral associates. If you want to be somewnat more valued as a young person in the Church, show them you mean business!!!! Turn the tides and show them you love your Mother Church and the Holy Father and Want to make a good, positive, orthodox difference in your parish and keep it alive! Also as a side note, there have been many female saints and some powerful writers such as St. Joan of Arc, St. Hildegard of Bingen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hildegard_of_Bingen), Mother Theresa, and Alice Von Hildebrand who’ve made their mark so to speak on the Church’s history as key figures (and Saints!). A modern day Catholic phenom or example is Dr. Janet Smith. Also, John Paul II has adressed this modern state of Women in the Church in a very heartfelt letter here: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_29061995_women_en.html

2B, “No Mentors”: I partially disagree with the respondent on this one. Where I disagree is that there are many good mentors in the Church, even if they are not in traditional roles. We tend to think of mentors as simply the priests, bishops, or nuns. While laity cannot provide traditional spiritual direction or deep counselling (high school and hospital chapliancy seems different from that,) mentors or role models in the church can extend to people we don’t think of normally: the sacristan, the head of a ministry such as lectoring, the youth minister, maybe even the parish secretary or humble Ms. Lumen Christi who goes to her weekly Mass, prays the Rosary daily, and has her wits about her with regards to the true teachings of the Catholic faith while looking after her children and grandchildren in her spare time! Just because there aren’t a lot of clergy to look up to, or a lack of clergy who are traditional and don’t espouse worldly values, it doesn’t mean there are a lack or good mentors out there. Also if its true Church knowledge you are looking for, there’s laypeople doing apologetics and teaching it right (e.g. Catholic Answers, Fr. Z) on the Internet, and maybe even your own diocese (though that can WIDELY vary according to what your bishop “allows`.`) If it really is that bad, then thanks to today’s technologies, go out there and find out the Truth for yourself! Thanks to the marvels of the Internet and other technology and cheap printing, the true Catholic faith in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and its Compendium or other good solid literature is one Amazon.com order away, or one is just a click away from the Vatican’s/Popes of present and pasts’ major writings on www.vatican.va/. Also, you are not alone. There are lonesome good faithful Catholic youngsters out there too if you know where to look. They are also amonst the pews. I’m sure they’d love a friend like you too and also to feel not alone out there. That’s what I did myself to revert, though a youth ministry helped me start to get there. And if you have the guts, go be that mentor! Go get the training and form that youth minsitry (a lot of hard work required though, so be firm in commitment!) Change the outlook on things! Finally, there are more traditional orders of nuns and priests springing up in correlation with the New Evangelization, and even the average seminarian or priest of the John Paul II and Benedict XVI generations is becoming more sound and reliable as spiritual mentors. Why if your local seminary allows contact with those seminarians outside of the parish in their practicum year, maybe a seminarian could be your mentor! They are relatively young too!

2C: Peer Involvement: I 100% support this woman’s statement on it. For high schoolers, and even more so young adults who aren’t married, the institutional Church overall, sucks, when it comes to reaching this age group. It seems still the big focus is: Getting those sacraments pumped into kids` spiritual veins like some sort of vaccine up to Confirmation age, Marriage, and seniors. They are the institutional Church`s biggest “clients/consumers” to use crude business terminology. Sadly this approach makes it much harder for youth to appreciate the Church, and when their parishes or communities (including univerisities) have nothing to offer or what is offered is rather POOR and uninviting like my univeristy years were, it`s either tackle the world alone with whatever little Catholic Faith you got, or “join the party“ of the secular, amoral, hedonist culture of the world and do whatever you want (and hopefully nothing serious will befall you …. ). However, there are efforts being made to incorporate youth into the Church`s daily life again. In the wake of declining parish populations and a slow but steady revival of Church theological and spiritual orthodoxy, parishes and dioceses are waking up to realize this group needs to be sought out as they are LOSING the youth to the world, flesh, and the Devil (if priests even acknolwedge his existence to begin with). Numerous parishes are even getting in there and dealing with pre-teens as, to paraphrase the EDGE (TM) youth ministry program that deals with Gr. 6-8 pre-teens: These kids are at a precous stage in their physical, mental, and especially spritual development as young Catholics. They are metaphorically “on the edge“ and if we don`t reach out to them in this ever increasigly aggresive secular world, we may lose them forever and they won`t remain in the Catholic Church …. and likely never desire to come back. This idea even extends to the teenage years and especally for young adults prior to marriage years. Even good young Catholic men and women like myself, can fall after that stage, even if they got a `better upbringing` in their youth and teens. Once they hit university, if they aren`t strong enough to hit the wall of secularism that smacks them in the face, or stay within a supportive Catholic parish/community, well you get the picture. Therefore, youth ministries of varying degrees are emerging. Now, not all ministries are equal. Some are organized programs like LIFETEEN(TM) and EDGE (TM) needing large bodies of people in a core team (priest, youth minister, leaders), while others are one to few person gigs with a less structured focus meeting less frequently. Also, not all ministers are theologically conservative, depending on their background, personality, and even what they are studying in their post-secondary Catholic school. This is where you gotta do your research and find one that will help you to love the Church (including its teachings) and also enhance your personal spirituality. However, for this survey respondent in particular, it was even much harder for her, as those people she looked up to bought into the secular culture of the world and gave her poor example to live up to as a Catholic. Sometimes, you just gotta bite the bullet and go against the grain of those you know, and YOU be the shining example of the faith, that “light of the world, the salt of the Earth“ to your family and friends. You be the catechist, you be the “New Evangelization“ in your actions and knowledge of the faith and maybe you will call your friends and family back to the spiritual arms of Mother Church (she is a mother in a sense, the “Bride of Christ.“). As a last note, do look around your city and parish for youth ministries and even singles communities of Catholics, or even Catholic dating services, if you are seriously considering marriage yourself. Just be careful which one you use. Ì recommend the one promoted on Catholic Answers, www.catholicmatch.com/ as that one is not a secular dating site, nor is it geared towards extreme ultra/rad-trad Catholics either.

Reason 3: THE LITURGY!!!!!!: ““I tried different Catholic churches in the area because I just didn’t seem to be getting anything out of the Mass, especially the homily.” Another person said, “I stopped going regularly because the homilies were so empty. And whenever the church wanted to raise money, they dropped the homily and talked money.” There were many complaints about the quality of homilies as well as about poor music at Mass.“ [My text is now red colour as I'm going into Fr.Z rant mode]

Homiletics/Catechesis
AHHHHHH!!!!! If there is any one thing that ticks me off as to making people leave parishes, it’s this. Priests and higher clergy (Deacons included), the homily is not the time to express your wishy-washy liberal sentiments or to promote social justice causes. It is also not “me” time to say something that makes you feel good nor joke around (though I’d make an exception for using it as a literary device to introduce your topic of necessity). The homily is the time to make sense of the Liturgy of the Word’s readings to the congregation, to tell “the moral of the story” as it were from the mouth of Christ himself, and even to relate Christ’s teachings to modern day life, and that may include reiterating Catholic teachings (yes, of THAT CATECHISM) and even apologetics as well. People crave those good, solid homilies they can take home, even just one nugget of spiritual umph to nourish their souls and minds, geared towards the objective truth of the Lord. They also are in a world of constant flux and are relying on YOU to tackle those issues, like that YouTube kid who says he loves Jesus but hates organized religion. We hate when you abuse the message of Christ to promote your latest church fundraizing campaign DURING THE MASS (unless you also teach us a theological lesson about the necessity of a parish building and its centrality to our faith) or even replace the homily with a “guest speaker” from the local diocesan charity that also deals out money to pro-abortion side arm divisions (knowingly or unknowingly). If you have to announce this stuff due to the commands from the bishops (an every Mass this Sunday kind of thing), the proper place in the Ordinary Form is before the dismissal, and in the EF prior to the “continuation of the Gospel” before the Homily. However you could also have people optionally listen after a Mass, and you don`t waste time with the uninterested early self-dismissal people either.

Finally, your homily might be ALL the Catechesis that a kid or adult will get in their whole week. No, you CANNOT TRUST the separate school systems as they are under the thumb of the government who gives them most of their funding or teachers who teach under the guise of “tolerance“ and “anti-bullying.“ They must obey whatever the government dictates or suffer financially, and that might include promoting social justice causes that contradict Church teaching. Worse, not all your teachers that work in those systems are Catholic. And the ones that are? I dare you to quiz them on their basics: What is the Trinity? What is the Mass? What is the Eucharist? What are the 7 Sacraments? Do they know what Sin is? Is there such a thing as Sin? Many would not be able to give a straight answer I’d bet you. Also, if the school administration and teachers are brainwashed socially and liberally beyond reasoning, the minute you step foot and mention SIN of any kind or a teaching on the big issues like papal infallability, abortion, euthanasia etc. I guarantee you will likely not be let back in to that school. Therefore clergy, you got only one shot a week to teach these people something about the true Faith. If you don’t want to and espouse a “Jesus loves everybody” message, they’ll find NOTHING UNIQUE about the Catholic faith vs. the other faiths out there, or worse will think you aren’t serious about your position and are just “sucking on the power teat” as it were. Now if they like that kinda “lukewarm” thing, fine, but maybe you should look ahead to the future 10-20 years down the road when your donating parishoners die and the collection baskets thin out because the next generation isn’t giving a lot and not having enough children (or none if they are contracepting), and the next two generations are leaving/have left the parishes after Confirmation. Just saying!

In fact, I’m personally switching my parish for the Novus Ordo, as this above is one of the reasons. At least at the new N.O. parish I’m seeking has priests that give good traditionally-minded hiomilies, one of them leaning more on solid catechesis and spirituality while another excels at applying the Gospel and LOTW to the modern world. That’s the stuff I crave baby!!! And it seems this young woman does too.

The Liturgical Music
Now to tackle music. Music’s purpose in the liturgy is outlined here in the Papal Instruction Liturgicam Sacram
5. Liturgical worship is given a more noble form when it is celebrated in
song, with the ministers of each degree fulfilling their ministry and the people
participating in it” (I, 5). In other words, it is used as an accompanyment to help lift your soul and help you be in a prayerful mood for the Mass and be able to particilate in it more fully. This document, BTW, was issued by the Vatican II pope, Paul VI. Let’s look further into this document: “
60. The new melodies for the vernacular texts certainly need to undergo a period
of experimentation in order that they may attain a sufficient maturity and
perfection. However, anything done in churches, even if only for experimental
purposes, which is unbecoming to the holiness of the place, the dignity of the
liturgy and the devotion of the faithful, must be avoided.” (V, 60) I post this with regard to that fodangled new pop-ish stuff and those tunes of the 60′s and 70′s in your parents’ days where pop hits were turned into Churchy songs (or in the worst cases even used) as well as some of the new genres like “praise and worship.” What can we take from this? Look, there is leeway for experiementation and development of new sacred music in Church history. But that does not give you the right to incorporate whatever music you like in the liturgy, just to be “in with the times.” If we want secular garbage we’ll get that off YouTube and we don’t need it elsewhere. We young people can’t stand when adults try to “cramp our style” so to speak.

Also accompanying that paragraph is this: ” …. Musical instruments can be very useful in sacred celebrations, whether
they accompany the singing or whether they are played as solo instruments. “The pipe organ is to be held in high esteem in the Latin Church, since it is
its traditional instrument, the sound of which can add a wonderful splendor to
the Church’s ceremonies and powerfully lift up men’s minds to God and higher
things.” “The use of other instruments may also be admitted in divine worship, given
the decision and consent of the competent territorial authority, provided that
the instruments are suitable for sacred use, or can be adapted to it, that they
are in keeping with the dignity of the temple, and truly contribute to the
edification of the faithful.”[43]” (VI, 62) Secular instruments and elements might be okay, but have to be assessed as to whether they are or are not geared to the liturgy. Also, just by their sound/nature, some instruments are clearly poorly suited or not at all for the liturgy (e.g. drums, electric guitar when it’s not electrically changed by an amp to sound acoustic, and even acoustic guitars to some extent) should be either cautiously used or not at all. The Church, the choir loft, and especially the sanctuary, is not suitable for a rock concert! Sadly there’s that territorial authority thing (cough, bishops, cough) so em if you get a liberal one, well don’t be suprized to find the aging hippie band or the folk choir with a guitar at the parish. As for the LIFETEEN/EDGE rock group bands, well I’m mixed. I say the best thing is, well fine let them have their band playing P and W music (if they have to have a band at all for those Masses) but do introduce them to Gregorian Chant and other better Church music to see the gamut of “allowable” music and read to the youth the document above, as well as some of the Vatican II stuff that also speaks with regard to the liturgy. Practically, Is there a schola or a choir school/cathedral they can take a day/eve trip to see? Maybe a secular choir that performs classical/baroque pieces out of musical respect or reverence?

Now you might say, what about the corny music that passes for liturgical “hymns“? Well likely they got by thanks to your bishop cause of this: “54. In preparing popular versions of those parts which will be set to
melodies, and especially of the Psalter, experts should take care that fidelity
to the Latin text is suitably harmonized with applicability of the vernacular
text to musical settings. The nature and laws of each language must be
respected, and the features and special characteristics of each people must be
taken into consideration: all this, together with the laws of sacred music,
should be carefully considered by musicians in the preparation of the new
melodies. The competent territorial authority will therefore ensure that in the
commission entrusted with the composition of versions for the people, there are
experts in the subjects already mentioned as well as in Latin and the
vernacular; from the outset of the work, they must combine their efforts.” (V, 54). So in a nutshell, if the bishop is lax and lets this stuff by, well too bad if your pastor okays it use. This is where you have to let your bishop and pastor know you don’t like what they do. If they don’t listen, you have every right to walk and register at another parish that does respect the Church’s liturgical tradition and has music that elevates your soul in the liturgy of the Mass. You also have the right to take your money and put it into the hands of competent musical ministers or choirmasters, and withhold it if your parish is screwing with your ability to truly worship Christ in the Mass in a proper, liturgically correct, manner. It is your hard earned money after all. Also one can protest with their feet: The Church CANNOT deny you your sacraments as long as you are not excommunicated (with exception to reconciliation likely at the hands of the bishop), so you can go to any Catholic Church and attend their Mass, including ones with all the smells and bells and Gregorian Chant if your home parish keeps singing “Gather us In” from that Gather hymnal and “Send down the fire”.


My point is, well, the lady has a valid point! Not all this kind of modern stuff is liked by our generation, and we do like the traditional uplifting Church music. We want music that lifts our souls to participate more fully in the Mass, and if you aren’t doing it parish X, we have the right and we will go to parish Y that has that unless we are, like “whatever.” though we likely won’t come back for a long time or never if we have that attitude. You can’t deny us our sacraments and kick us out for our liturgical musical preferences. Furthermore, not everyone is moved by your type of music (though not everyone, even some faithful young Roman Catholics, are moved by Gregorian Chant and actually are moved by Praise and Worship or other forms of liturgical music). My point is, move with your feet and your wallet if you can’t stand the bandstand.

Alright rant mode OFF. Unfortunately the liberal/mainstream media has made a mess in the minds of many average people with this one, Reason # 4: “…. The scandal surrounding the sexual abuse of minors by clergy was mentioned often. One man said that what did it for him was “the bishop’s refusal to list pedophile priests on the diocesan Web site and his non-support of the effort to lift the statute of limitations for bringing sexual abuses cases forward in the courts”

Well I cannot stand for this person’s diocese. However, generally, those priests and bishops who have done anything like this, you’ve made the Church worse and you deserve the criminal and civil and Church penalties you get. Even Canada is not immune. It is generally known that some of the nuns and priests who took care of Native Canadian reserve school and residences, treated the Natives with abuse of multiple kinds. Also, recently a bishop from the Maritimes, Raymond Lahey, was found with pornography with his computer in 2009. So there’s no shortage of stories even for Canada. However, generally, as a whole, the majority of Church clergy do not engage in this kind of activity. In fact this can be applied to every major profession in modern society. The expression is “a few rotten apples spoil the bunch”. Now, I will not perform apologeitcs on the Church sex crisis in this post in detail as it’s been extensively covered by other Internet and media apologists. For Canadians, the best arguments I can recommend are found in the works of Michael Coren of Sun Media TV, especially “Why the Catholic Church is Right.” He tackles the issue with a whole chapter RIGHT FROM THE START of his book. As for the rest of you viewers you can also view Michael Voris’ video series on this matter in his little 6-10 min daily faith blurb called “The Vortex” on youtube. Search for Michael Voris, Vortex, and sex scandal or crisis in Catholic Church. I believe he did the weeklong series at the beginning of September in 2010 when the 2nd wave of the crisis hit or was still at high tide?

And this is where I will retire. I could spend many a day on this portion of the survey and more, but this mind has other things he’d like to devote his time to. Enjoy the read, and as always, my blog rules are in effect, so think before posting.

Pax Tibi Christi, YCRCM.

View original:  

Study in America Magazine: Why People Leave the Catholic Church and What They Want

The priest is the guide to the truth

Thumbnail

Source:

The priest is the guide to the truth

Tradition and the future


Tradition and the future

  • CC Archives