Daily Archives: April 19, 2012

Alberta’s Paul Martin

Who exactly is Alison Redford? When she was elected last year to lead the Alberta Progressive Conservatives, it was puzzling. A province that had produced Preston Manning in the 1980s, Ralph Klein in the 1990s and Stephen Harper in the 2000s had just elected a protégé of Joe Clark, the man of the 1970s, who, though an Albertan, was always out of step with his own province.

In the days when Reform was rising in Alberta, Brian Mulroney would often point to Joe Clark’s senior role in the government as evidence that Albertans ought to be content. Highlighting Clark’s centrality likely only accelerated the obliteration of the federal PCs in Alberta.

By 2011, the Clark wing of Canadian conservatism, marked as it was by political blundering and intellectual vacuity, was down to Lowell Murray, wrapping up 30-plus years in the Senate, and Scott Brison, sitting as a third-party backbencher in the House of Commons. So when Redford became Alberta premier, Albertans wondered where exactly she would position herself.

Redford’s campaign has been trumpeting that it is “not your father’s PC Party.” It’s altogether Clarkian in its haplessness, that tagline (in adapted form) being most famously used by Oldsmobile, a once venerable brand that is now defunct.

In any case, Redford is serious enough about the claim, denigrating the record of Ralph Klein, the father-figure of Alberta’s PC Party. It’s actually your “grandfather’s PC Party” that Redford is running, skipping back a few generations for inspiration to Peter Lougheed, who first won election 41 years ago.

Generationally, Redford is part of an influential cohort of Calgary political figures. Stephen Harper would be the most influential, but also in that category would be Redford’s opponent, Wildrose Party leader Danielle Smith, federal Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, and Ezra Levant, the one-man media phenomenon.

Levant has characterized Redford not as the second coming of Lougheed or Clark, as she would have it, but rather as Kim Campbell 2.0. Just as Campbell championed the “progressive” rather than “conservative” wing of a tired PC Party, Levant expects that Redford will preside over the disintegration of the Alberta PCs.

The stakes are that high, for if Wildrose wins a majority in Monday’s Alberta election, it is likely that the PCs will quickly wither away. After all, their best argument for relevance, namely that they alone can govern Alberta, will be stripped away from them.

I have been watching Redford’s increasingly frantic campaign with keen attention and growing alarm. Calgary is my hometown, and I still identify with my Alberta roots, though now living in Ontario. I also belong to that same cohort; indeed, Redford, Smith and I all went to Bishop Carroll High School – Smith and I at the same time, though we didn’t move in the same circles, and Redford several years ahead of us.

The thought occurs that Redford is not running as Clark, or Lougheed, or Campbell, but rather as Paul Martin, who inherited a dynasty and led it to defeat. Recall the frantic Martin toward the end of the 2004 and 2006 campaigns, arms flapping, face flushed, telling everyone about how he alone could protect the high holy grail of Canadian freedom: the unlimited, enthusiastic abortion licence? The claim was fantastic, given that Harper had always been cool to the pro-life agenda, not to mention that the Liberal party itself had pro-life candidates.

Redford is copying that strategy, painting social conservatives as bogeymen that she alone can keep at bay. (I wish Smith really were a social conservative, but she simply is not.)

Redford professes herself “frightened” by Albertans exercising their rights to conscience, even though her own government has defended them in the recent past – as well they should, given that conscience is the first of the fundamental freedoms listed in the Charter. She is attacking positions in the Wildrose that long have been intelligently advanced by a member of her own cabinet, Ted Morton.

Martin’s fin-de-campagne mode operated on the premise that he could scare voters in Ontario and Quebec into staying with him by invoking the spectre of retrograde Westerners and rural folk massing at the city limits. Neither noble nor particularly effective, it at least had some plausibility to a mindset that had been locked for too long inside Toronto and Montreal. For Redford to adopt the same strategy – to run against Albertans in Alberta – is at least curious.

She may pull if off, for one does not underestimate the resourcefulness of a party four decades in power. Yet the end always does come, and Redford has run a campaign worthy of it.

Tags:

See the original post: 

Alberta’s Paul Martin

Planned Parenthood pushes California bill to let non-physicians conduct abortions

“Where the funding’s coming from and who’s doing the training?” asked Dana Cody of Life Legal Defense Foundation.

State Sen. Christine Kehoe addressed eight graders on Constitution Day.

SAN FRANCISCO, April 19, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Although a legal loophole has long allowed the process, a California legislator has proposed a bill to formally allow non-physicians – including midwives – to perform abortions. Now a state pro-life group wants to know who has been anonymously paying for and conducting an existing training program.

State Senator Christine Kehoe, D-San Diego, introduced a bill allowing non-physicians, such as midwives and nurse practitioners, to perform suction abortions after receiving training through a state project.

“I think it endangers women’s health,” Dana Cody, president and executive director of Life Legal Defense Foundation (LLDF), told LifeSiteNews.com. “They’ll get more medical information if they get plastic surgery than they will if they undergo an abortion.”

The bill is sponsored by Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, NARAL Pro-Choice California, the American Civil Liberties Union of California, and California Latinas for Reproductive Justice. It is supported by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

(Click “like” if you want to end abortion! )

The measure, S.B. 1338, codifies an existing loophole. Cody said California state law allows certain staff personnel to perform medical procedures, and the law does not specifically preclude abortion.

The University of California-San Francisco began offering the Health Workforce Pilot Project #171 (HWPP) to teach the abortion techniques to lower level medical staff in 2007. An estimated 40 people have completed the course.

However, much remains secret about the training.

Cody said $3.5 million of the funding for HWPP comes from an undisclosed private foundation. The names and records of the trainers and graduates were also missing.

LLDF petitioned UC-San Francisco for this information in late January. After ignoring the petition for more than a month, the university has yet to furnish all the public documents LLDF sought – so last Friday the legal rights group filed a Writ of Mandate to compel administrators to turn over these records.

“The purpose of the writ was to get information subject to public record, since it’s a University of California regent program, to see where the funding’s coming from and who’s doing the training. Do they have any reports against them?” Cody asked. “I think the public is entitled to know that.”

From the incomplete information officials have turned over, Cody said LLDF has learned “the agencies doing the training are Planned Parenthood and Women’s Health Services, which is a Sacramento-area clinic with a terrible history.”

“Is this just another way to get money for clinics?” she asked.

Increasing abortion and opening a lethal procedure to less qualified medical personnel are bad ideas under any circumstances, she said – but especially while so many unanswered questions remain.

“It just seems like with this issue of abortion, they have a free pass on so many levels,” Cody told LifeSiteNews.

LLDF will get its day in court on May 10 in the Superior Court in Alameda County.

A hearing on S.B. 1338 is scheduled for Thursday, April 26 before the Senate Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee.

Cody said concerned persons can contract their assembly member, and members of the committee, by visiting www.leginfo.ca.gov.

See the original article here - 

Planned Parenthood pushes California bill to let non-physicians conduct abortions

Top Knight of Columbus: ‘if America amputates religion, liberty will vanish as well’

“There is now, a new and unprecedented government intolerance of religion,” said Grand Knight Carl Anderson.

WASHINGTON, April 19, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Obama administration’s attacks on faith-based groups represent a political power grab that, by attempting to control even the definition of religious expression, are an unprecedented danger to America’s tradition of liberty, according to the Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus.

Carl Anderson, the head of the world’s largest Catholic fraternal organization, published the remarks on National Review Online on Thursday, the same day he gave remarks at the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast. The prayer breakfast follows on the heels of the announcement of a new HHS mandate forcing religious groups to pay for abortifacient drugs, sterilizations, and other forms of birth control.

The Knight of Columbus recalled the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, author of The Gulag Archipelago, who warned against the Communist’s ideological manipulation of history that caused “a closing, a locking up, of the national heart”: “even though compatriots apparently speak the same language, they suddenly cease to understand one another.”

“Religion has long been a key component in America’s national life. But today it is increasingly marginalized and erased,” said Anderson. “Today we find a new hostility to the role of religious institutions in American life, while the role of government is expanding in unprecedented ways.”

Anderson pointed to the Obama administration’s assault on religious institutions, both through the HHS mandate and the recent Supreme Court battle Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC, as signs of a dangerous turning point in the government’s perspective of its relationship with religion. “The administration’s logic is shockingly consistent on these matters: Faith-based groups may function only if their ‘faith and mission’ are acceptable to the government,” he said.

“There is now, a new and unprecedented government intolerance of religion.”

Now, Anderson notes, religious leaders speaking out on moral issues in the public square are criticized for breaching the “separation of church and state” by “government officials who use their power to refashion church identity according to their own design.”

The very concept of the separation of church and state, he notes, has been corrupted to bring about precisely the “political use of religion at the service of the state” it was intended to prevent.

“I think Jefferson would have been the first to agree that if America amputates religion from American public life, liberty will soon vanish as well,” wrote Anderson.

Read Anderson’s full column on NRO here.

See original article - 

Top Knight of Columbus: ‘if America amputates religion, liberty will vanish as well’

She shoots, she scores! Catholic girls’ cup returns

Thumbnail

2012 tournament to kick-off April 25

Eight Catholic high-school teams will lace up their cleats to vie for the B.C. Catholic senior girls soccer championship, from April 25 to 27.


St. Thomas More, Notre Dame, Little Flower Academy and St. Pat’s are in Pool A; the host Carney Stars, Holy Cross, St. Thomas Aquinas and Immaculata are in Pool B.

The official tournament schedule.

After two days of robin-robin play at Town Centre Field in Coquitlam (260 Pinetree Way), the championship round is at Archbishop Carney (1335 Dominion Ave., Pt. Coquitlam). The final is on April 27 at 1 p.m.

See the original post:

She shoots, she scores! Catholic girls’ cup returns

Seven years ago today…

Thanks for this Mrs P. So good to see it again.
I remember it well. I was in the late stages of pregnancy with #3 & couldn’t sleep. Flicked on the telly at around 2am, just at the right time to see this live, and promptly started shaking Mr Blurn to wake him. Poor love thought thought the baby was coming.

ReplyDelete

Continued here - 

Seven years ago today…

What a week!

Thumbnail

We’ve had a crazy week…builders, plumbers, plasterers, window-fitting-guy here for over a week now as they fix up our bathroom and also put in a patio door from the dining room straight into the garden. Also, carpet-fitters to fit new stair carpet. Plus daddy has been gone all week on a work trip to the Czech Republic. Add in a random 24 hours of high fever for Leo, and a whole lot of rain and grey weather every day…and let’s just say I’m glad it’s almost Friday!

Needless to say that with all these builders, building has been the play-activity du jour!

All of your tools have come out and Joseph you’ve been busy sawing, hammering, measuring all week!

You even asked for a cup of tea!! Like a proper builder!

Even little Leo has been in on the building…..

…pictured here with his brother’s electric drill (but Sssshhhh! Dont tell Joseph!)

In between the raindrops we went out for the afternoon, and the fresh air was enjoyed by all!

Daddy will be back tomorrow, and the building work should also be finished…so hoorah!

Now all we need is the sun to return!

Excerpt from - 

What a week!

Off to St Cecilia’s

Thumbnail

DSCF0182

There is something satisfying about travelling the entire length of a railway line. Shortly I will be leaving for Waterloo where I shall take a train to Portsmouth Harbour. The catameran will then take me to Ryde, home of St Cecilia’s Abbey, a thriving community of Benedictine nuns who sing the whole office and Mass in Latin every day. Their life is the traditional Benedictine life according to the rule. No surprise that they have a steady stream of vocations. I count a number of old friends among the community and it will be great to see them. Tomorrow morning I will be celebrating Mass for the community – Novus Ordo, entirely in Latin, sung according to the Solesmes conventions about as perfectly as it is possible here on earth.

Here is a photo from a previous visit where I was celebrant for Vespers and Benediction. I think that I did clink the chains.

IOW 077

See the original article here:

Off to St Cecilia’s

Vatican fails to take account of my travel plans

Thumbnail

Oi! Vatican! Are you ‘aving a larf? I go away for 24 hours to lecture for some good Benedictine nuns and celebrate Mass for them, spending several hours each way on trains boats and buses and you decide during this period when I am away from the blog:

1. To announce that the SSPX have responded to the doctrinal preamble and that it only remains for the CDF and the Pope to consider it. And the Vatican Press Officer, Fr Lombardi, admits that it is encouraging and that there is a desire to reach a conclusion. (Texts found most easily at Rorate Caeli as well as other posts with analysis.)

2. To issue a Doctrinal Assessment of the US Leadership Conference of Women Religious along with a statement from Cardinal Levada.

3. To announce a Vatican Widget in honour of the anniversary of the election of Pope Benedict.

OK, so n.3. was not as important as 1. and 2., but I have sent off for the widget eagerly in order to take up the promise that, as the English version of the communiqué states: “it will be possible to export all the principal novelties.”

n.1. is very encouraging and certainly is a good reason to set aside some of my Easter money for a bottle of champagne to celebrate when things do come to a conclusion.

n.2. is of course sad in a way. Omar Gutierrez admonishes us: Let’s Be Sober About the LCWR Assessment and I suppose it would be unseemly to get plastered and end up watching EWTN’s coverage and chanting “You’re not singing anymore!” So we had better not do that. Still, I think that many faithful Catholics will rejoice that the Holy See is taking practical steps to implement advice that the Holy Father gave to the Bishops of England and Wales on the last ad limina visit:

In a social milieu that encourages the expression of a variety of opinions on every question that arises, it is important to recognize dissent for what it is, and not to mistake it for a mature contribution to a balanced and wide-ranging debate. It is the truth revealed through Scripture and Tradition and articulated by the Church’s Magisterium that sets us free.

As to champagne, Fr Z is sticking with the one that featured for the announcement of

Summorum Pontificum

. I’m minded to branch out and get some Bolly.


Link:

Vatican fails to take account of my travel plans

Russians overwhelmingly endorse ‘gay propaganda’ ban

A poll conducted by state-run pollster VTsIOM, showed 86 percent of 1,600 respondents nationwide in support of the proposal.

MOSCOW, April 19, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A proposal to outlaw propaganda from the homosexualist movement, particularly that aimed at children, has met with overwhelming approval from the Russian public. A poll conducted by state-run pollster VTsIOM, showed 86 percent of 1,600 respondents nationwide said they supported a ban on the promotion of homosexual relationships.

Recently, the Russian Federation delegation at the G8 Summit refused to endorse a joint statement by foreign ministers that included “lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender” people in its affirmation of human rights. A footnote to the statement read, “The Russian Federation disassociates itself from this language given the absence of any explicit definition or provision relating to such a group or such persons as separate rights holders under international human rights law.”

Sergei Ryabkov, Russia’s deputy foreign minister said that “under the pretext of protecting so-called sexual minorities, in effect there’s aggressive propaganda and the imposition of certain behavior and values that may insult the majority of the society.”

Join a Facebook page to defend marriage here.

However, eighty-five percent of respondents in Moscow and St. Petersburg, and 96 percent in rural areas – 94 percent overall – said they had never seen any “gay propaganda.” The poll found that the main source of the materials is television, which accounts for 57 per cent of all instances. Eight per cent of respondents referred to a ubiquitous “cult of homosexuality” in the media.

In March, the city government of St. Petersburg garnered outrage when it passed a law banning promotion of homosexual relations and pedophilia to minors. Foreign and home-grown homosexualist activists called for the boycotting of travel to St. Petersburg, a popular tourist destination. A similar bill has since been introduced in the federal parliament, and a Moscow city official said this week that the capital is also considering a ban on the promotion of sodomy, RIA Novosti news service reports.

Washington Post reporter Michael Birnbaum says that during the recent national elections, anti-western sentiment, including heavy criticism of the homosexual culture and its widespread acceptance, featured prominently in campaign rhetoric.

The St. Petersburg law can impose fines equivalent to $17,000 for spreading “propaganda of sodomy, lesbianism, bisexuality or transgenderism among minors.” This includes “information forming misrepresented conceptions of social equivalence of traditional and non-traditional marriage relations.”

Such laws are bound to be popular in a country where a 2010 poll found that 74 per cent of Russians said homosexuals are “morally dissolute or deficient” and believe that homosexuality is “an amoral mental deviation.”

View original article: 

Russians overwhelmingly endorse ‘gay propaganda’ ban

Catholic doctors defend Spanish Bishop against charges of ‘inciting hate’

Homosexual activists in Spain are pushing for the prosecution of the bishop.

April 19, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – As homosexuals lobby for the prosecution of Bishop Juan Antonio Reig Pla of Alcala de Henares for teaching the Catholic Church’s position on homosexual acts, an international group of Catholic doctors has rushed to the Spanish Bishop’s defense, reports the CatholicNewsAgency (CNA).

Bishop Reig came under intense criticism after condemning homosexual acts in a Good Friday homily, and saying that persons with homosexual attractions can experience a kind of “hell” in their lives when they visit gay night clubs.

In a later interview with the Internet news service Religion en Libertad (Religion in Liberty), he reiterated that “the consequences for many people” of such behavior, are “coloquially speaking a ‘hell’ in their lives” and asserted that homosexual inclinations can be cured through therapy.

Join a Facebook page to defend marriage here.

Responding to the controversy, the State Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Transsexuals and Bisexuals (FELGTB), with the Gay Collectives of Madrid, said that it plans to file charges against the Bishop for “inciting hate.” The organization also condemned outright the formal teachings of the Catholic Church, claiming that they “promote segregation and discrimination” and are not protected by the Spanish Constitution.

In an April 17th statement, the International Federation of Catholic Doctors Associations defended both Bishop Reig and the teachings of the Catholic Church.

Reinforcing a distinction that Bishop Reig had already made, the Federation emphasized that Catholic doctors had “profound respect” for persons with homosexual inclinations, but reiterated the teaching of the Church against “the practice of homosexuality.”

The bishop had condemned discrimination against persons with homosexual inclinations in his interview with Religion en Libertad, but noted that the Catholic Church had always taught that it was “intrinsically evil” to act on those inclinations.

Credit - 

Catholic doctors defend Spanish Bishop against charges of ‘inciting hate’

New York Times op-ed: Cohabitation can lead to divorce

Cohabitation has increased by more than 1500% since 1960, and at the same time, so has the divorce rate.

Dr. Meg Jay

April 19, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The belief that living together before marriage helps to avoid divorce is “contradicted by experience,” says a New York Times Op-Ed by clinical psychologist Dr. Meg Jay, published this past Saturday.

Jay, a specialist in young adult development, professes to be “neither for or against” cohabitation, but offers a searing critique of the practice, which she says is becoming “a norm” among young adults. According to her article, the phenomenon has increased by more than 1500% since 1960, when there were about 450,000 unmarried couples living together. There are now over 7.5 million such couples.

Recent studies have indicated that there is a causal relationship between the rise in divorce that has accompanied the rise in cohabitation, says Jay. In the past, she notes, some researchers have rejected the suggestion that cohabiting can actually cause divorce, attributing the correlation between the two to “selection, or the idea that cohabitors were less conventional about marriage and thus more open to divorce.”

Drawing from research and from her own experience working with young adults, Jay argues that there is actually something internal to the practice of living together that can put a future marriage on shaky grounds.

The decision to live together is often one that couples “slide” into simply because it is economical or convenient, she says. After moving in, they feel “locked in” because of all the entanglements of living together, such as co-ownership of furniture or pets, which can in turn lead to a mentality of sliding unreflectively into marriage.

Jay cites the situation of one her clients, a 32-year-old woman she calls “Jennifer,” who lived together with her boyfriend for four years, married him, and was looking for a divorce lawyer less than a year later.

“I felt like I was on this multiyear, never-ending audition to be his wife,” Jennifer had told Jay. “We had all this furniture. We had our dogs and all the same friends. It just made it really, really difficult to break up. Then it was like we got married because we were living together once we got into our 30s.”

“I’ve had other clients who also wish they hadn’t sunk years of their 20s into relationships that would have lasted only months had they not been living together,” Jay writes. “Others want to feel committed to their partners, yet they are confused about whether they have consciously chosen their mates. Founding relationships on convenience or ambiguity can interfere with the process of claiming the people we love.”

Studies have also revealed that men and women tend to go into a cohabiting situation with different mentalities, she notes, with women seeing it as a “step towards marriage” and men often viewing it as “a way to test a relationship or postpone commitment.”

“This gender asymmetry is associated with negative interactions and lower levels of commitment even after the relationship progresses to marriage,” she says.

Original article:  

New York Times op-ed: Cohabitation can lead to divorce

UK clients not allowed to ask for help leaving homosexuality: professional therapist guidelines

Dr. Michael Davidson said the system overrules even the wishes of patients, telling them, in effect, that they must remain in the homosexual lifestyle, whether they want to or not.

LONDON, April 19, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – While most medical ethics throughout the western world has adopted the primacy of patient autonomy as its guiding principle, the psychiatric and psychological professions in the UK are becoming increasingly authoritarian in matters of sexuality, according to one would-be therapist.

Recently published professional guidelines in the UK say it is an “ethical offense” to either offer to help a client overcome homosexual temptations and feelings, or to accede to a request to do so from a client.

“I would agree that the focus is no longer on autonomy” in ethics in psychotherapy, said Dr. Michael Davidson, PhD, Director of the Core Issues Trust. In Britain’s main psychotherapeutic organisations, “the person-centred approach is not being respected,” he said.

The Core Issues Trust is a Christian organisation that helps equip Christian ministers to help those with unwanted same-sex attraction and who want to leave the gay lifestyle.

Dr. Davidson told LifeSiteNews.com this week that he has fallen afoul of a “politically motivated” shift within the counselling and psychotherapeutic professional organisations, one that he says is betraying the real needs of clients and patients, and their freedom to make choices.

“I started my training in 2009 with the UK Psychodrama Association, and was very open and explicit about my position, including about my own journey out of homosexuality,” he said.

Nonetheless, two years into his training to become a therapist, Davidson was suddenly presented with an “interim order” telling him he was a threat to “public safety” and was not allowed to practice any type of therapy or even to train and attend classes, pending the outcome of an investigation into his conduct.

Click “like” if you want to defend true marriage.

Since the publication last summer of the professional guidance, he said, the psychotherapeutic community has created a climate in which therapists who do not toe the official “gay affirming” line, daring to assert that homosexuality is not, or does not have to be a fixed condition, face severe censure, even the loss of their professional credentials.

Dr. Davidson said that the system overrules even the wishes of patients, telling them, in effect, that they must remain in the homosexual lifestyle, whether they want to or not.

The association that Davidson trained with, the UK Psychodrama Association, is affiliated with and accredited by the UK Council for Psychotherapy (UKCP). The recently published UKCP guidelines say, “It is exploitative for a psychotherapist to offer treatment that might ‘cure’ or ‘reduce’ same sex attraction as to do so would be offering a treatment for which there is no illness.

“It is exploitative to offer treatment to reduce same sex attraction when various studies bring into question whether such treatments change a person’s sexuality.”

Citing a single research paper, the guidance says, “Research has shown that offering, or agreeing to the client’s request for, therapy for the reduction of same sex attraction is not in a client’s best interests.”

Dr. Davidson’s troubles started with an interview on BBC radio in which he “expressed the idea that therapeutic support should be made available to those who want to move away from homosexuality.” The result was that his membership and trainee status were revoked by the British Psychodrama Organisation. His future remains in question.

Davidson adamantly denies being a Christian fundamentalist. “I’m not into ‘praying away the gay,’” he said. “I do come from a faith background, but I believe that the psychotherapeutic literature [supporting the idea that homosexuality is a form of pathology] goes way back.”

The scientific literature, he said, “indicates consistent attempts to document the fact that people can and do change. Some to full heterosexuality, others to celibacy. Some cannot be helped at all.”

Although the possibility of helping clients leave homosexuality is accepted by some in the U.S., the current thinking in the UK is more rigid, and the hostility within the organisations precludes even making the case. Despite a long history of examining the issue in the professional literature, Davidson says, the British Royal college of Pscychiatrists will accept nothing less than “gold standard research,” that is, randomised, double-blind controlled trials, which Davidson says are almost impossible to produce while protecting clients.

In effect, the result has been not only a “closing down of critical debate,” he said, but the adoption of a “scientistic point of view.”

“This is a dogmatic use of science to say that we should never again look at this issue.”

He called it a “very worrying” trend, and one that can back both clients and therapists into impossible corners, while research into the possible physical and neurological sources of sexuality is halted due to political bias.

“The more I look at the stuff coming out of neural science, the more I see indications that there are biological sources to the role of motherhood, fatherhood, femaleness, maleness.” But these cannot be investigated under this climate, he said.

“Radical feminism has taken us into a context in which the only difference between the sexes is the genitalia, not paying attention to what neural science is telling us about the brain and hormones.”

Davidson cited the well-documented case of a man who had a head injury and “woke up gay.” He entered the homosexual lifestyle, but if he had chosen another route and asked for help, the current rules would have prevented it.

“It’s anti-scientific,” he said. “That’s not to say that I think the science is black and white. I don’t think we know very much about human sexuality, its plasticity, the fluidity of sexuality, but I think this old binary model of gay and straight is not working.”

“I think we are doing damage when we make these categories something that are so fixed. So if a nine year old boy has homosexual thoughts we have to tell him to take on a gay identity. It’s an appalling abuse of freedom.”

“I think it’s a political motivation,” he continued, “favouring a sexual liberation. I think Judeo Christian values are being challenged, that there seems to be a move for an extreme individualism, that puts the rights of adults above needs of children, privileging adult sexuality.”

Original post:  

UK clients not allowed to ask for help leaving homosexuality: professional therapist guidelines

Tyranny of the Laity

Okay, this has got to stop. And priest everywhere should say something about it, at least once a year.

People, ladies, please. There is such a thing as private prayer. Honestly. Sometimes people come to church, not to be one of the gang, not to enter into the Public Prayer of the Church, but simply to be before the Blessed Sacrament and pray quietly about personal stuff. Do not interrupt us.

Once upon a time, Catholic churches were open at all hours. Catholics could duck in at odd times and pray whenever we wanted. But, alas, those times are no more, and so if we want to get into an inner city church, we have to consider when Daily Mass times are.

Meanwhile, churches used to be arranged in such a way that people could pray quietly, privately, in chapels, as Mass (or even Masses!) went on somewhere else in the church. Cathedrals, especially in Europe, are still arranged this way. Parish churches, sadly, not so much. Especially not the Edinburgh church that has made it into the CR twice for seriously coming become me and the sacrament of reconciliation with its stupid innovations.

I never learn. Honestly. Today I ducked into the above church for a quick private prayer. I hoped the doors would be unlocked and they were, perhaps because Mass was still going on. The church was rather full; I was edified. It is, after all, only a Wednesday. Good on the people. Excellent.

The problem was that they were spread out all over the church, and there was nowhere to hide from the inevitable, if officially OPTIONAL, sign of peace. I looked left, right, up, down. But there was nowhere for me and my private prayers, my private prayer that all the interruptions preventing me from writing my Krakow lectures would stop driving me crazy.

Finally I chose just to plunk myself down on the carpet behind the pews and the glassed off space to the shop, offices, crying room, etc. I had to kneel anyway, for I had arrived during the canon. When the others stood, I zipped over to a more remote spot behind the pews, a spot where I would be just far enough away from anyone wanting to give the sign of peace.

I knelt with my head in my hands, hoping everything about me said, “Don’t mind me! I’m not praying this Mass right now! I’ve just come in! Just having a word with the Most High! You just go ahead and continue the Prayer of the Church, Brudern und Schwestern!”

But wouldn’t you know it.

“Excuse me,” said a voice, interrupting my prayers about interruptions.

I looked up. There was a grey-haired woman before me, holding out a hand. She had been aalllll the way over on my right, far from everybody else, but apparently didn’t think I should be. I took her hand. It was limp.

“Peace be with you,” she said, and went allllll the way back to her place.

WHY do people keep doing that!!!! What is this obsession with making people who obviously don’t want to go along with the liturgical crowd? Mass is not a meeting of the Hitler Youth or a synchronized swim team, for heaven’s sake. Stop telling us to turn to our left and right and say hello to our neighbour. Stop forcing us to shake hands with you when it is obvious we’d rather not. Stop interrupting our private prayers!

See the original post: 

Tyranny of the Laity

A Vatican II Moment: Shredding tradition in the Diocese of Aveiro, Portugal

The rite and formulas for the sacrament of penance are to be revised so that they more clearly express both the nature and effect of the sacrament.

Sacrosanctum Concilium, 72

The description is given by those who posted the video, so we merely translate this peculiar innovation:

  • sample
  • CC Archives