Daily Archives: April 17, 2012

Thuribles At Dawn…

Thumbnail

Oh dear. The challenge has been issued. The inimitable Fr. Z has suggested that His Hermeneuticalness is notoriously

bad at incensation

, because of the need for

fire drills

among the servers. His Hermeneuticalness has countered by asking Fr. Z to

choose his weapons

… himself opting for a Heckler & Koch MP5.

…I’d have thought an MP3 player would be better for reproducing the clinking sound, but then I’m just a blonde girly so I’ve probably got the wrong end of the stick…

However, I think that Fr. Z has failed to consider the need to train servers in fire-fighting technique. Some of those servers wield a mean thurible. Ever wondered why we don’t have a carpet on the sanctuary at Blackfen…?

2011 10 01_0128

I can confirm that Fr. Tim has, on occasion, had to step back rather sharply to avoid concussion.

It might also be noted that Fr. Z is being just a tad disingenuous. He has had first-hand experience of His Hermeneuticalness’ techniques with the thurible…

2011 10 07_0034

…as well as demonstrating his own proficiency…

2011 10 07_0070

…and, as my photographic evidence confirms, Fr. Z resisted the impulse to “take out” His Hermeneuticalness despite the obvious opportunity offered to the deacon at High Mass. Sadly, I cannot recall whether there was much in the way of clinking. Next time I shall have to video proceedings!

2011 10 07_0085

Read article here:

Thuribles At Dawn…

Fine art of friendship

Last night I dreamed, repeatedly, of this song: “Fine Art of Friendship”, by King’s X. It came back to me again and again in different guises. In one dream I was explaining to my wife how difficult it is to play on the guitar (not that I would know), and in another we were watching instructional videos showing how to play the chords, pluck the strings, etc. Later in the dream a large group of people were pretending to play the song on “violins”, the violins in question being made of wooden spoons.

I have no idea why this particular song should have been on my mind. It has been months, if not a year or more, since I last heard it. In any case, here it is:

A pretty good song! I can think of worse ways to pass my hours of sleep.

Tags:

Originally posted here: 

Fine art of friendship

Quickpost: Spike in pageviews again

Thumbnail

Hi all,

My record got broken again. at 17:00 according to the blogosphere, I got 19 hits! Checking the day stats for the whole dayy (0000h – 2359) 18 of those are from the Netherlands. I am not 100% sure whether this means there are some hungry Catholics there seeking knowledge, or someone’s fishining for information, or some kind of internet bot is spying on me somehow. Hmmmmmm…..

YCRCM.

Source article: 

Quickpost: Spike in pageviews again

Why pro-abortion politicians are Science-Deniers

My advice to politicians? Take your fingers out of your ears. Face the facts.

I remember when I was about 7 years old, and didn’t want to hear what my older brother was telling me. I’d try blocking him out, with a finger in each ear, chanting: “Nah, nah, na-na-nah. I can’t hear you!”. It was a childish tactic, with a simple objective: if I could deny hearing the message, I wouldn’t have to accept whatever correction or wisdom he was trying to pass on. I could carry on with my bad behavior and ignorance.

Many Canadian politicians today are using the same childish tactic in order to carry on with ignorant attitudes about abortion, even to the point of denying science.

In February, pro-life MP Stephen Woodworth announced his Motion 312 to set up a parliamentary committee that would study what modern medical science tells us about when a human being first comes into existence. On behalf of Stephen Harper, the Justice Minister Rob Nicholson immediately shot out with: “The Prime Minister has been very clear, our Government will not reopen this debate”.

Translation: “The Prime Minister has been very clear, he wants to avoid all scientific facts about the child in the womb”.

Another example of a politician using my childhood, fingers in the ears trick, was the reaction to Motion 312 by Conservative MP for Simcoe North, Bruce Stanton: “I don’t support the motion… The Supreme Court has given ample position on the rights of moms and I believe we need to keep the law the way it is.” Besides the fact that Stanton is wrong, and the Supreme Court has never declared abortion to be a right, his response screams “I don’t want to be informed by science. Let’s remain in blissful ignorance!”

I don’t get it. What’s so scary about being informed by science?

Woodworth’s motion is tentatively scheduled for first hour of debate on April 26. Another hour will follow in the late spring or early fall. Sadly, the motion is unlikely to pass given the Prime Minister’s stiff opposition to “re-opening the abortion debate”.

If it does pass however, what sort of facts will the committee look at to answer the question of whether the embryo and fetus are human beings?

Of course, it’s already settled science that each person comes into existence at the time of conception (fertilization). That’s the only conclusion this committee could possibly arrive at. The photo below, taken at 12 weeks from conception, is a piece of evidence I’d personally love to set before the committee’s eyes. I’d follow it with the question, “Would a blob of tissue have finger nails?”

My advice to politicians? Take your fingers out of your ears. Face the facts. One day, science-deniers on the humanity of pre-born children will be lumped in with holocaust-deniers. You really don’t want to end up on that side of history.

See the article here: 

Why pro-abortion politicians are Science-Deniers

Conical Chasubles

Thumbnail


New Liturgical Movements

has a picture of a thirteenth century chasuble from Toledo. I used to have one in this shape, I gave it away to a priest who liked I it, I must admit I did too.

It was the ancient shape of the cape or over coat worn over the tunic, it should come down to the knees. It is made from a semi-circle of fabric, with orphrey uniting the straight edge and giving a little extra movement so it isn’t exactly 90 degrees.

In the West it was gathered up in the crook of the arms, giving it rather beautiful folds, with more or less an equal amount of fabric front and back, in the East in was worn so the back looked more like a cope and the front had less bulk. But East and West used the same vestment.

This is the vestment that the traditional Roman presumes the priest is wearing, hence he is supposed to be helped with it when his hands drop below the elbow, for example at the incensation. Worse problems are encountered at the elevation of the host and chalice, the server literally has to lift the fabric of the chasuble to enable the priest to raise his hands so the host might appear above his head.


  • Once the elevation was introduced two developments took place to ease things for the priest, those who thought the conical shape, little hutness, was important cut the sides of the chasuble from the curved edge to the shoulder, hence the Roman or “fiddleback” chasuble.
  • Those who thought the fullness was important eased the 90 degree angle sometimes to the 180 degree point, where there was a straight edge along the shoulder and the garment became, rather than a semi-circle, a full circle, especially in the late twentieth century when it could be made of cheap polyester. It is what is commonly call the Gothic chasuble.

Though the Gothic shape goes back at least to the 12th century, earlier the the Toledo chasuble, below is the Becket chasuble at Sens. Pugin favoured the Gothic version coming to the elbow joint, made with an angle of approximately 135 degrees, the prohibition of such garments by the Sacred Congregation of Rites was one of the issues that led to his increased neurosis, and eventual madness. Eventually the Comgregation allowed vestments that came either to the shoulder, elbow or wrist, the angle of the cut was not considered.

The 90 degree angle and the circularity was previously significant in so far as it was related to the square, a symbol of the universe, of perfection: the three corneredness to the Trinity.

Visit site:  

Conical Chasubles

Archdiocesan Choir of Philadelphia in Concert this Sunday

Thumbnail

Dr. John Romeri, who for many years ran a spectacular music program at St. Louis Cathedral, had barely landed in Philadelphia when he had already lined up a concert series at the Cathedral-Basilica of Ss. Peter and Paul. This past year has seen concerts by the Choir of

Westminster Cathedral

and

Tenebrae

, among others.

This Sunday, the inaugural year of this concert series wraps up with a performance of the Mozart Coronation Mass (K. 317), along with works by Gabrieli, Handel, Beethoven, and Philip Stopford by the Archdiocesan Choir of Philadelphia. The concert will be at 3:30 in the cathedral.

Here’s ticket info.

If you can’t make this weekend’s concert,

a whole new year

is right around the corner, complete with a repeat appearance of Tenebrae. These concerts are an exciting addition to the lively choral scene here in Philadelphia.


Print this post

This article:  

Archdiocesan Choir of Philadelphia in Concert this Sunday

Church and Community

Thumbnail

The church was always intended to be a community of love. But most Catholic parishes are a long ways from there. The church is rightly concerned with doctrine and liturgy. We need the true faith and we need to celebrate it in an authentic way. But at the end of the day it is by our love for one another that people will know we are His disciples. There has been a

lot of talk

about how protestant churches are not as successful as they used to be in building community for young adults.

Catholics have been seeing people leave

for quite some time. The latest study of why they leave does not mention community much but that suggests Catholics don’t even expect community from their church. They see it as a cold institution. They hope it becomes less cold. The idea of it being a place where people feel supernatural love for each other is so far away that it does not make the radar.

So what is going wrong? Why don’t Catholics bond with each other and form friendships that make the whole world want to be Catholic? That is what Jesus wanted for His church. We are His church. What gives? There are likely many reasons. One that comes to mind is that it is too easy to be Catholic today. People bond when they share a struggle. But too many Catholics don’t struggle. If we would all struggle to understand and live out all the teachings of the church we would find ourselves being powerfully bonded together. The culture would be laughing at us and we would be looking for encouragement and support. But many parishes are not that different from the culture. Sure there are some who want to know the faith and live the faith but they are not exactly the majority. A serious Catholic is almost as likely to find his faith being ridiculed inside his parish as he is in the society at large. So you tread very lightly.

People find solutions. There are organizations like Opus Dei that offer that kind of community. Some find it online. But that is not the supernatural love that the world would find amazing. That is just groups of like-minded individuals hanging out together. There is nothing remarkable about that.

1 Peter 2:11 talks about Christians being like aliens in a foreign land. That resonates with me because when I was growing up the church I went to was mostly dutch immigrants. We were close. My dad was a pastor so that helped but most families socialized together a lot. They went to the same school. They had boys and girls clubs as part of the church. The teenagers had a strong community. It was all quite natural.

That broke down a generation later when the church members became less dutch. We were not bonded like aliens in a foreign land because we were living our faith so well. It was because we were actually aliens in a foreign land. When we ceased to literally be that we ceased to live like that. But we should have that dynamic all the time. We should not fit very well in our culture. We should feel strange enough that we should naturally seek to spend time together as Catholics.

That is when the church starts to act as a body animated by the Holy Spirit and the whole becomes greater than the sum of the parts. Then her holiness and her beauty will be easier to see. It is often when the church is persecuted that we see this happening. When the people who are there are paying a price or taking a risk to be there. Then the witness becomes even stronger because you not only see the body of Christ but you see the cross as well.

Link:  

Church and Community

Seraphic on Stein

The next two weeks are going to be insane with research and writing, so you won’t be seeing much from me. If you want to find out what I have to say, you’ll have to come to the women’s retreat in Krakow or, if male, hang around outside.

Devoted Male Fan: What did she say?

Retreatant: Niestety nie mówie po angielsku.

However, to tide you over and give you a sliver of what I will be talking about on May 2,

here is my latest in the CR

.

The point I was trying to make about Stein-not-solely-Holocaust-martyr is that Stein is not part of another age. Stein was part of our age, and then the Holocaust broke in on her. I was born in the early 70s, so to me the Holocaust is history whereas Stein’s ideas are current events.


Update: Stein, not Steyn, peeps!

Visit link:  

Seraphic on Stein

Fr. robert Barron: Why Catholics leave the Church

All considered, an interesting article designed to provoke thinking, as Fr. Barron always does.

Some Comments:

A third eminently correctable problem is one that I will admit I had never thought about before reading this survey. Many of the respondents commented that, after they left the church, no one from the parish contacted them or reached out to them in any way. Now again, I can anticipate and fully understand the objections from pastoral people: many Catholic parishes are huge—upwards of three or four thousand families—and staffs are small. Yet, just as major corporations, serving millions of people, attend carefully to lost customers, so Catholic parishes should prioritize an outreach to those who have drifted (or stormed) away. A phone call, a note, an e-mail, a pastoral visit—anything that would say, “We’ve noticed you’re not coming to Mass anymore. Can we help? Can you tell us what, if anything, we’ve done wrong? We’d love to see you back with us.

This is one that I have noticed. many of the Evangelical churches are like “Cheers” you know, ‘Where Everybody knows your name’.

, while Catholic chuches don’t offer that kind of fellowship among many of the members, especially those on the periphery. are Our Parish here in Belleville

IS making an effort to address this problem. We have started having regular socials right after mass in the new parish center, put on by some of the various groups in the church. It gives people a chance to meet and talk instead of rushing off the minute the last verse of the recessional is sung, and provides parishoners with an opportunity to meet some of the groups in the church who might be the answer they were looking for in terms of how they can be more involved. By knowing your parishoners and getting involved in parish life reduces the desire to leave for greener pastures, and if they do, at least they are known by someone who can give them a call and find out what’s up.

For too long Catholics have relied on the Pastoral team and staff to do all the work, and by getting involved at the parish level we can keep our brethren from falling away through relationship, which is very difficult for even the most dedicated pastor.

As for some of the other things put forth in the article, in many csses they are excuses given, when scratching the surface it is usually easy to find the real reason why people leave… Sin… I am reminded of a story I heard about Archbishop fulton J. Sheen who once got on a plain in full priestly habit, and the man seated next to him started enumerating all the reasons why he had left the church, and hated the church. Archbishop Sheen listened until the man finally ran out of gas, then looked at him and asked “how much did you steal?” the man broke down and confessed that he had stolen thousands from the church while he served there. Quite often when we can’t bring ourselves to read the bible or go to mass, it is because we have unconfessed, unrepented sin getting in the way, and that is where many of the excuses for walking away come from.

View original post here:

Fr. robert Barron: Why Catholics leave the Church

Only Tax Payers Should Vote

From Michael Youssef’s blog
According to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, 51 percent of American households pay no federal income tax. They may pay some taxes on gasoline, tobacco, and alcohol—and they pay their Social Security contributions. But the majority of Americans do not pay any of the taxes that fund our national priorities—national defense, homeland security, welfare, education, foreign aid, and so forth.

America is drowning in debt. Taxpayers are demanding fiscal responsibility—but our leaders won’t listen. What’s the solution? This may sound like a radical idea, but our fiscal emergency demands radical intervention: Only those who pay taxes should be allowed to vote. Only those with “skin in the game” should be allowed to choose our representatives.

Some critics would say that this idea is an attack on the poor. Nonsense. I would disallow the non-taxpayingrich from voting as well—and from buying influence through lobbying. There are more non-taxpaying rich Americans than you might suppose—such as L.A. Dodgers owner Frank H. McCourt Jr., a multimillionaire who paid no federal or state income taxes from 2003 to 2008, according to the Los Angeles Times.

There are those who would argue that everyone should have a right to vote—it’s only fair! But is it fair for one group of citizens to vote to take the private property of other citizens? Is it fair for the beggar to vote himself a steak and lobster dinner at his neighbor’s expense?

To those who still think this idea is unfair, let me pose this question: Are you seriously telling me that 51 percent of Americans are poverty-stricken? Almost 90 percent of American households subscribe to cable or dish TV services. If they can afford hundreds of dollars per year for entertainment, they can certainly afford to become shareholders in our republic.

Makes perfect sense to me.

Taken from:

Only Tax Payers Should Vote

McGuinty’s bullying bill would enshrine anti-Christian slur, says pro-family leader

Thumbnail

McGuinty’s bullying bill would enshrine anti-Christian slur, says pro-family leader

  • sample
  • CC Archives