Daily Archives: February 11, 2012

Cardinal Collins suited to lead Church against its detractors

Thumbnail

I came back to the Church some 10 years ago, after a sojourn in the outer rooms of the Christian mansion. Being a journalist, and because I wanted to sing out the good news, I wrote about it in a newspaper column. There were numerous notes and letters; some predicting a future in hell or some earthly nastiness, but most of them kind and helpful.

One of the most surprising came from the archbishop of Edmonton. It was simple, informal and overwhelmingly friendly and supportive, written, it explained, from the archbishop’s office. Which, the writer told me, was a Tim Horton’s across the road from the cathedral. I had just met Thomas Collins, soon to be our newest cardinal, thank God.

Since he became archbishop of Toronto, we have met for coffee every couple of months and I see him at various public conferences and events. I don’t flatter myself that I have some special place or status — anyone who knows Collins realizes that there are few more accessible and approachable prelates, and the number of people he meets is quite staggering. One priest who worked with the archbishop told me that it was all he could do to stop him giving out his personal phone number to well-wishers, especially young men who showed any interest at all in a religious vocation.

Since taking office, Collins has fundamentally changed the atmosphere and flavour of Ontario Catholicism and, by extension, the entire Canadian Catholic Church. Which is not to criticize any of his predecessors — he would loathe the idea — but to acknowledge that a good newcomer can achieve great things in any situation. There are some people who complain that it is has never been so difficult to be Catholic, but we need to remind ourselves that the chalice is half full rather than half empty. We have had two of the greatest popes in Church history, and a new generation of archbishops across North America in particular who are precisely attuned to the new orthodoxy and to the pressures of the contemporary world.

Those demands are not always appreciated by those in the Church who want immediate change. There are no theological magic wands, no episcopal panaceas, and in religion as well as in politics, the polarized right and left seldom grasp the nuances and complexities of the real rather than the imagined world. Of course, for example, there are Canadian political leaders describing themselves as Catholics who cause scandal, and of course there are teachers at ostensibly Catholic schools and colleges who teach heresy, but 21st-century archbishops walk in mazes rather than parks. It’s simply not as straightforward and easy as it once was. Thomas Collins knows this as well as anyone. Goodness, he lives it every day.

CardinalBanner2

As a cardinal, His Eminence will be a prince of the Church, with a special relationship with the Pope and the Vatican and an intense significance within Roman Catholicism. But the power and the communication also flow in the other direction, in that he is a conduit for Canadian Catholics, for their views, fears, ambitions and beliefs, and this particular cardinal is wonderfully qualified to act in such a vital role.

The next decade is going to be an extremely difficult time for Christians, with long-held assumptions about the fundamental nature of society, family and morality being routinely challenged, and people of faith and in particular Catholics being subjected to often ugly critique. We will sometimes be condemned by people who want not dialogue and co-existence but absolute victory and a sense of triumphalism and oppression. It’s certainly not the gauntlet of communism and fascism, but it is the glove of liberalism and relativism. And while they are clearly different, they both knock their opponents down with a clenched fist.

Catholicism is being and will be attacked by decadence on the one side and materialism on the other. In other words, we should look neither right nor left, but look up. We’re helped to do so by the great Christians of the past and by the great leaders of the present. Congratulations Cardinal Thomas Collins, and God bless you in all that you do. God bless all of us too.

Read this article:  

Cardinal Collins suited to lead Church against its detractors

Write your MP today

Write your MP today

on February 11, 2012

KW Right to Life expresses great hope and determination to support the motion of Stephen Woodworth MP (Kitchener Centre). An old Law 223(1) that states a child is not a person until the moment of complete birth and how that interpretation relates to current medical and scientific evidence needs to be examined.

We are under no illusion that there will be an immediate law to make abortion illegal, in particular the first trimester, however this motion sets a precedent for getting to the fundamental principle of whether or not a preborn child is a person that has implications for the protection of life beyond the womb.

We encourage supporters to write the Prime Minister at pm@pm.gc.ca and their local MP’s, Braid.P@parl.gc.ca and Albrecht.H@parl.gc.ca to vote in favour of the motion this coming June. Discussion for the motion begins in March and again in June before the vote. Please thank Stephen Woodworth, Woodworth.S@parl.gc.ca for this much needed motion.

If it passes, the task will be finding proof that indeed the child in the womb should have rightful claim to personhood. We pray. We act.

Jane Richard
KW Right to Life President



Comments are closed.

Credit: 

Write your MP today

Football Heresy

NFL has come and gone, with the Giants champions overs the Patriots. Yet, within the theological arena especially inside ecumenical circles, the phenomenon of Tim Tebow is still going strong. Tebow set an incredible Christian witness across North America with his sideline prayer by taking a knee. Admittedly his act of ‘Tebowing’ left nobody indifferent and one must wonder out loud if Tebow was a muslim would anyone really care if he prayed to God publically? Probably not. Tebow has been a very outspoken critic of abortion and the same sex marriage debate earning the respect and admiration of not only his fellow evangelicals, but also countless numbers of Catholics. Now that the ecumenical political correctness is over,..let’s cut straight to the chase,..Tim Tebow adheres to a heretical sect of Christianity, which views the Catholic Church as counterfit. Gloves off,..time to respond!

Bob Tebow, Tim’s dad, runs a ministry in the Philippines which seeks to ‘evangelize’ Catholics. See here. Now, while it is true that some Catholics are ‘cultural’ and do need to meet Jesus,..I firmly believe that it is high time we step up and meet the challenge of this non sense. Evangelicals are cute, they really are, they do an awful lot of good! However we need to start evangelizing them!!! Show them the fullness of Christianity in all its glory, the contemplative, the charismatic, we have it all!! All rooted in the most Holy Eucharist,.the source and summit of the Christian life! We as Catholics need to head to the bible belt in deep south USA, bring these souls home to the Eucharist, and then using their zeal,..confront the secular and muslim world!

Next time we meet an evangelical/Fundamentalist/whatever name,..drop a bomb,..As in ‘Dude,.sola scriptura isn’t even in the Bible bro!,..The first 350 years of Christianity existed without a set in stone New Testament,..how do you know these 27 books are inspired? Did ya get a warm fuzzy feeling?,..Cause y’know Joe Smith got one too when he walked into the woods and found the Book of Mormon,..right?’ Did ya know Luther and Calvin were both Catholic priests and venerated the Blessed Mother? They even still venerated Her after they schismed off! Did ya know your ‘Old Testament’ canon was formulated by a Jewish council in Jamnia in AD 90? That’s why the deuterocanonicals are missing!’

Am I being harsh? maybe, but sometimes a tough love approach has to happen. These are good people who handicap their intelligence by saying stupid things! Peter Ruckman? C’mon!! He was eaten alive by Karl Keating and yet, the fundamentalist Church where the debate took place actually posted it on Youtube! Dr Jack and Rexella,..well God bless them,.they’re,..well,..nice. Kirk Cameron,.dude seriously? I mean seriously?,..You want to debate the existence of God with your banana?,..Here try Bertrand Russell vs Fr Copleston SJ,.See here.

So Tim Tebow, Bob Tebow, Shawn Michaels, the Baldwin brothers, all you well meaning evangelical pastors, leaders, missionaries. As Catholics we have it all! There is a ‘fit’ for all your spirituality,..time to stop eating baby pablum and bite into a theological filet mignon! Are there bad examples? Yes, the Church is not a hotel for saints,..it is a hospital for sinners! For every scandal, there is still a Mother Teresa! For all the corruption, there is still a Blessed John Paul the Great,..and for every well meaning believer, there is still Jesus Christ, substantially present in the most Holy Eucharist! Come Home!

Sacred Heart of Jesus,…………Have mercy on us!

View original - 

Football Heresy

Trumpets and Drums

Thumbnail

The row in the States over Obamacare has been fascinating at all sorts of levels. There is, for instance, the almost unique spectacle of Western bishops manning up in defence of the Catholic faith, and they are demonstrating just how effective that can be. It remains to be seen whether their stance will be reflected at the polls, but I should be surprised if it were not. Then there is what

Rorate Caeli pointed out

, the fact that this row has actually brought to the attention of the American public what the Church teaches about artificial contraception and associated matters. Catholics in the pews who have not had the subject mentioned in a sermon or catechesis for half a century are now made aware of what the situation truly is. And thirdly, there is the situation in the UK. Our compulsory National Health Service contributions have for decades been paying for abortions, sterilizations, free contraception in schools and a whole host of other morally dubious or plainly wrong procedures. The chillingly-named NICE* has but to declare a particular procedure or drug a good use of public funds and our money goes to pay for it without a by-your-leave.

The original conception of the National Health Service was, I believe, a noble one. But it has become a kind of monster in some respects, and a shibboleth in others. No politician wants to be seen to be demolishing the NHS, and yet we are confronted with the situation that our health care provision is not, actually, free, and is not nearly as good as that to be found in France or even Spain. We have been through a huge period of privatization of health care at all levels except the vital one of who actually administers the money. If I could choose an insurance system that did not pay for abortions &c, then I should certainly do so, and that would bring some pressure to bear (which is presumably why this part hasn’t been privatized). There would, of course, have to be some system whereby those too poor to afford health care could continue to have access to it.

All of which is getting around to saying: wouldn’t it be nice if our own bishops also were able to man up and speak the truth. I happen to know that there really are behind-the-scene discussions with the government which are not without their effect, but these discussions are invisible to the population at large, even the Catholic population. There is a lot to be said for sounding the trumpet and beating the drum. It works wonders for morale, and I think that that is what we need right now.

*Non-UK readers might not know what NICE is; it stands for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. But it was also, prophetically, the name for the National Institute for Coordinated Experiments in C.S.Lewis’ That Hideous Strength, the body whose immoral experiments with human life brought dreadful calamities to the world.

View this article: 

Trumpets and Drums

BRAHMS AND BOLLYWOOD

Thumbnail


BRAHMS AND BOLLYWOOD

Hello there. It's your friendly neighbourhood TH2 once again. Admittedly, that last post wasn't so friendly in tone and exposition, so maybe it's time for a break, for something upbeat. Working on some odds and ends, hopefully to be uploaded soon. But, in the meantime, some music for your enjoyment...

First up is Brahms' Allegro giosco from his Symphony No. 4 in E minor, Opus 98. Heads up on the Sforzando forte about midway through the composition, at 3:25. A very nice piece...


Let's now head eastward to Bombay circa 1989 and listen/watch the song Jugni Aayee Dulhan Bankar from the Hindi film Main Tera Dushman. A favourite of mine, funny, somewhat enigmatic, makes me smile. Playback singer is Kavita Krishnamurthy, performed by the always charming Sridevi...

Share/Bookmark

Jump to original: 

BRAHMS AND BOLLYWOOD

Homily at the Funeral of Patricia Douglas

Thumbnail

Before sharing some thoughts with you all, I must say a few words to Pat’s family. The first is a word of sympathy from Archbishop Michael Miller, who asked me to represent him today. Although Pat had long retired from her employment with the Archdiocese by the time Archbishop Miller arrived, he was very grateful for the volunteer service she offered for many years afterwards.

I also would like to convey to the family the condolences of another priest who worked closely with Pat, Msgr. Mark Hagemoen. He had hoped to be with us, but the timing of the funeral made it impossible.

Msgr. Hagemoen wrote “I remember Pat fondly, both in terms of her work at Catholic Family Services, and on the Advisory Council for the Archbishop. She certainly was a dedicated, wise, and generous member of the local church, and someone who helped a great many people in their various personal journeys.”

And there is another person I need to mention: Pat’s very dear friend, Sister Kathy Dunne, a Cenacle Sister from Louisiana. Sister Kathy called me this morning to say how much she wishes it were possible for her to be here with us. There is no doubt that she is united in prayer with our Eucharist this afternoon.

***

If you asked me for a single word to describe my friend Pat Douglas, the word would be healer. She joined a healing profession when she became a nurse. She embraced one of nursing’s greatest therapeutic challenges when she specialized in psychiatric nursing. She devoted herself to emotional healing in her work as executive director of Catholic Family Services, our church counselling agency.

As a mother to her children, both in childhood and adulthood, she sought to be a healing presence.

In her service on the archdiocesan Advisory Council, she helped to heal those wounded by the Church and, indeed, helped to heal the Church itself.

And in later life, spiritual direction—the work of strengthening and healing wounded hearts—became her great interest. Our last conversation concerned her desire for further studies in this area.

By the way, I recall that conversation very well. Since I feel the effects of middle age rather keenly myself, and Pat was more than a dozen years older than I, when she talked about further studies I said something non-directive and encouraging. Something like “are you nuts?”

Pat was indeed very knowledgeable about the human person, about the human psyche.

But she was a Christian, not a Freudian. She believed that the greatest healer, the source of the deepest and most complete resolution of fear and sorrow, is Christ. To her, the person of Christ and his saving action was the source of the answers to life’s crises.

If she were here, Pat would ask us to turn to this source in the face of our sorrow and confusion. A matter of fact woman in many ways, she would ask us bluntly: so what do you believe?

Perhaps we have heard the Christian story too often. (They say familiarity breeds contempt.) Have we, perhaps, lost the ability to apply the saving story of Christ’s suffering, death and resurrection to our own circumstances? Every funeral is a chance to enter into this sacred story, which sustained our ancestors even in unspeakable sorrows.

Pat was convinced that it is—or can be—”the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our affliction,” as St. Paul says in the first chapter of Second Corinthians. She believed that “as we share abundantly in Christ’s sufferings, so through Christ we share abundantly in comfort too.”

But how does this happen? How does God comfort us? How does sharing in Christ’s sufferings open the door to consolation?

St. Paul begins to answer these questions by telling us that we are children of God (and who is more ready to comfort than a parent?). But he goes a step further, and ties it all in with suffering. He says we are not only children but also heirs of God—and joint heirs with Christ “if only we suffer with him so that we may also be glorified with him.”

St. Paul says that it’s precisely in suffering that we are most closely connected to Jesus. He is already our fellow human being in his human nature; but we really become “one of the family” by sharing in his suffering.

Still, how does sharing with Jesus as an “heir” address our pain and suffering, except in giving it some extra dignity? Paul again: “I consider that the sufferings of this present time are as nothing compared with the glory to be revealed for us.”

There’s the answer: what we inherit with Christ is the kingdom. What we share with him is his resurrection, his glory.

In other words, although there is no answer on earth that fully addresses all our losses, there is an answer in heaven that completely redeems them. Earthly pain, accepted in union with Christ, leads to eternal life. As one old Quaker saying has it, “no cross, no crown.”

We have become so secular and immediate in our thinking, even our religious thinking, that we hesitate to look for the answer to life’s biggest questions in the life to come. Even priests like to show how the Gospel brings answers and peace here and now (as it does, in many situations). But the big picture is the life to come, and without a lively sense of it we will never experience the full freedom that Christ came to bring.

And the number one freedom He won for us is freedom from the fear of death.

Pat knew all this, and lived all this, in a life that was not untroubled by suffering and pain. Her attraction to the Religious of the Cenacle was obviously connected to their apostolic work of spiritual direction. But I suspect it was rooted also in the foundress of the Cenacle Sisters, St. Therese Couderc, whose life is an outstanding example of free and humble acceptance of misunderstanding, suffering and anguish, through faith in the mystery of Christ.


You know, it isn’t possible to speak of these things at every funeral. In some cases the congregation isn’t ready to hear them; in some cases the person who died didn’t believe them.

But today we mourn someone who did. Someone for whom Christian and Catholic faith opened the door to peace and healing. She would want it to do the same for us.

Read this article - 

Homily at the Funeral of Patricia Douglas